DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Understanding and Attitude to Sustainable Development of College Students for a Nuclear Power Plant Construction in Education for Sustainable Development through Panel Discussion

패널토론을 적용한 지속가능발전교육에서 대학생의 원자력발전소 건립에 대한 지속가능발전 인식과 태도

  • Received : 2015.06.29
  • Accepted : 2015.08.31
  • Published : 2015.10.31

Abstract

This study examined understanding and attitude of sustainable development(SD) of 38 college students in a nuclear power plant construction after education for sustainable development(ESD) through panel discussion. The results were as follows: First, after lesson 66% of students were expected that SD is possible if scientific technology is developed and a frugal life for the protection of environment is carried out. However, the remaining students regarded SD as an ideal concept, because they thought it is not possible to pursue environmental sustainability and socio-economic development simultaneously. Second, students' opinions in the evaluation of constructing a nuclear power plant in three aspects(environment, society and economy) before and after panel discussion were changed as follows; 1) After panel discussion, the objectors increased to 21% in economic evaluation, while the supporters increased to 11% in environmental evaluation. 2) Students majoring in engineering or natural sciences changed their opinions to agree in environmental evaluation because they considered a nuclear power plant safe and eco-energy. However students majoring in social science/business or liberal arts/arts changed their opinions to disagree in economic evaluation because they considered a nuclear power plant as high-cost energy when assessing danger-accidents cost, public consensus cost, operation and maintenance cost, and waste disposal cost. 3) This change of decision-making in students majoring in social science/business or liberal arts/arts after panel discussion was statistically significant(p<0.05). Implications of panel discussion as a teaching and learning method in ESD are also discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Burmeister, M. Rauch, F. & Eilks, I.(2012). Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1RP90060A
  2. Choi, H. S. Shim, K. C. So, K. H. & Yeau, S. H.(2010). A Survey of Pre-service Elementary Teachers' Perceptions, Attitudes and Practical Intention toward Sustainable Development. Korean Journal of Environmental Education, 23(2), 129-144.
  3. Choi, J. & Kang, W.(2012). Latent Class Analysis of Environment Engineering Undergraduate Studnets' Attitude towards Sustainable Development(SD) and Difference of Educational Experience about SD and Year. Korean Journal of Environmental Education, 25(4), 408-421.
  4. Corney, G. & Reid, A.(2007). Student teachers' learning about subject matter and pedagogy in education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 13(1), 33-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620601122632
  5. Jo, E. H.(2012). Research Trends in Domestic ESD : Focused on the Theses and the Reports for about 10 years. Global Studies Edcuation, 4(2), 83-95.
  6. Jo, S. N. Lee, H. J. Joo, Y. J. & Kim, N. Y.(2011). Qulitative Research Design & Practice. Green Press: Seoul.
  7. Jo, W. K.(1994). Keynote Speech: Environmental issues and the role of the college students. Journal of Environmental Education, 7, 123-128.
  8. Ju, H. S. & Lee, S. K.(2011). Elementary School Teachers' Perceptions of Sustainable Development and Education for Sustainable Development. Korean Journal of Environmental Education, 24(1), 102-113.
  9. Ju, H. S. & Lee, S. K.(2013). Pre-service Elementary Teachers' Understanding of Sustainable Development Focusing on the Concepts of Sustainability and Equity. Korean Journal of Environmental Education, 26(3), 397-409.
  10. Kang, D. S. Nam, J. H. & Chung, Y. H.(2005). Sustainability Indications for the Han River Estuarine Area of Kyeong-gi Bay in Korea. Jour. Fish. Mar. Sci. Edu., 17(2), 156-170.
  11. Kim, C. Lee, S. K. Kim, N. Ju, H. S. Jang, M. & Kwon, H. S.(2012). Elementary and Secondary Teachers' Perception on Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and Formal ESD Cases in Korea. Korean Journal of Environmental Education, 25(3), 358-373.
  12. Kim, D. W. Park, S. R. Park, W. H. Song, H. Y. & Lee, D. H.(2003). Conference on Energy Security. Korea Energy Economic Review, 2(1), 169-193.
  13. Kim, E. K.(2012). The way to the third industrial revolution, from growth to sustainable development. Korea Institute for future development: Seoul.
  14. Kim, J. S. Park, S. D. Park, J. H. Yoo, K. P. Lee, J. H. & Jo, Y. S.(2004). Clean technology for sustainable development. The National Academy of Engineering of Korea Research Series 2. Nanam: Seoul.
  15. Kwon, N. W. & Park, I. S.(2012). Theory and teaching of discussion class for teachers. Moonumsa: Seoul.
  16. Lee, S. K. Lee, J. Y. Lee, S. Lee, Y. Min, G. Shim, S. Kim, N. & Ha, K.(2006). The Awareness of Teachers and College Students towards Sustainable Development and Education for Sustainable Development. Korean Journal of Environmental Education, 19(1), 1-13.
  17. Moon, S. C.(2015). Assessment and recognition of college students on genetically modified crops in sustainable agriculture. J. Korean Soc. People Plants Environ. 18(4), 265-271. https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2015.18.4.265
  18. Park, M. Y.(2008). Some Instances-reporting of "Presentation and Debate" Class Management That Is Doing by the University of Seoul. Ratio et Oratio, 1(1), 183-227. https://doi.org/10.19042/kstc.2008.1.1.183
  19. Park, S. M.(2009). The Characteristics and The Issues of Writing Education For Science and Engineering Students. Badalmal, 45, 301-326.
  20. UNCED(1992). Agenda 21: Programme of action for Sustainable Development. Rio Declaration on Development, UNCED.
  21. UNESCO(2005). United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development 2005-2014. International Implementation Scheme Draft, UNESCO.
  22. WCED(World Commission on Environment and Development)(1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  23. Yune, S. J.(2012). Analysis of Good College Teaching Characteristics by multi-faceted approach. Jour. Fish. Mar. Sci. Edu., 24(6), 963-976. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2012.24.6.963