DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

FLY-BY ENCOUNTERS BETWEEN DARK MATTER HALOS IN COSMOLOGICAL SIMULATIONS

  • AN, SUNG-HO (Department of Astronomy & Center for Galaxy Evolution Research, Yonsei University) ;
  • KIM, JEONGHWAN H. (Department of Astronomy & Center for Galaxy Evolution Research, Yonsei University) ;
  • YUN, KIYUN (Department of Astronomy & Center for Galaxy Evolution Research, Yonsei University) ;
  • KIM, JUHAN (Korea Institute for Advanced Study) ;
  • YOON, SUK-JIN (Department of Astronomy & Center for Galaxy Evolution Research, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2014.11.30
  • Accepted : 2015.06.30
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

Gravitational interactions - mergers and fly-by encounters - between galaxies play a key role as the drivers of their evolution. Here we perform a cosmological N-body simulation using the tree-particle-mesh code GOTPM, and attempt to separate out the effects of mergers and fly-bys between dark matter halos. Once close pair halos are identified by the halo finding algorithm PSB, they are classified into mergers ($E_{12}$ < 0) and fly-by encounters ($E_{12}$ > 0) based on the total energy ($E_{12}$) between two halos. The fly-by and merger fractions as functions of redshift, halo masses, and ambient environments are calculated and the result shows the following.(1) Among Milky-way sized halos ($0.33-2.0{\times}10^{12}h^{-1}M{\odot}$), $5.37{\pm}0.03%$ have experienced major fly-bys and $7.98{\pm}0.04%$ have undergone major mergers since z ~ 1; (2) Among dwarf halos ($0.1-0.33{\times}10^{12}h^{-1}M{\odot}$), $6.42{\pm}0.02%$ went through major fly-bys and $9.51{\pm}0.03%$ experienced major mergers since z ~ 1; (3) Milky-way sized halos in the cluster environment experienced fly-bys (mergers) 4-11(1.5-1.7) times more frequently than those in the field since z ~ 1; and (4) Approaching z = 0, the fly-by fraction decreases sharply with the merger fraction remaining constant, implying that the empirical pair/merger fractions (that decrease from z ~ 1) are in fact driven by the fly-bys, not by the mergers themselves.

Keywords

References

  1. Barnes, J. & Hernquist, L., 1996, Transformations of Galaxies. II. Gasdynamics in Merging Disk Galaxies, ApJ, 471, 115 https://doi.org/10.1086/177957
  2. Dubinski, J., Kim, J., Park, C., & Humble, R., 2004, GOTPM: a Parallel Hybrid Particle-mesh Treecode, NA, 9, 111 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newast.2003.08.002
  3. Gnedin, O. Y., 2003, Tidal Effects in Clusters of Galaxies, ApJ, 582, 141 https://doi.org/10.1086/344636
  4. Kim, J. & Park, C., 2006, A New Halo-finding Method for N-body Simulations, ApJ, 639, 600 https://doi.org/10.1086/499761
  5. Kim, J. H., Peirani, S., Kim, S., Ann, H., An, S., & Yoon, S., 2014, Formation of Warped Disks by Galactic Flyby Encounters. I. Stellar Disks, ApJ, 789, 90 https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/90
  6. Patton, D. R., Torrey, P., Ellison, S. L., Mendel, J. T., & Scudder, J. M., 2013, Galaxy Pairs in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey - VI. The Orbital Extent of Enhanced Star Formation in Interacting Galaxies, MNRAS, 433, L59 https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slt058
  7. Springel, V., Di Matteo, T., & Hernquist, L., 2005, Black Holes in Galaxy Mergers: The Formation of Red Elliptical Galaxies, ApJ, 620, L79 https://doi.org/10.1086/428772
  8. Toomre, A. & Toomre, J., 1972, Galactic Bridges and Tails, ApJ, 178, 623 https://doi.org/10.1086/151823
  9. White, S., 1978, Simulations of Merging Galaxies, MNRAS, 184, 185 https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/184.2.185