References
- Gray, R. & Kang, N. (2014). The structure of science arguments by secondary science teachers: Comparison of experimental and historical science topics. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 46-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.715779
- Han, G. B., Min, H. J. & Paik, S. H.(2012). The teachers' and students' perceptions on lectures and experiments of law of definite proportion in middle school science classes. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 56(1), 144-158. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2012.56.1.144
- Jang, S. & Jeong, S. (2010). Analysis of elementary students' scientific justification activities based on evidence. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(4), 414-426.
- Jeong, H. S. & Oh, E. A. (2003). Sixth graders' inquiry understanding for scientific evidence and explanation. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 23(6), 634-649.
- Kim, H. K. & Song, J. W. (2004). The exploration of open scientific inquiry model emphasizing students' argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 24(6), 1216-1234.
- Lim, H. & Jeong, I. (2014). Effects of scientific argumentation on argument tasks with incorrect alternative ideas in elementary science classes. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(1), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.1.195
- Lim, H. J. & Yeo, S. I. (2012). Characteristics on elementary students' argumentation in science problem solving process. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(1), 13-24.
- Lim, J. K., Song, Y. M., Song, M. S. & Yang, I. H. (2010). An analysis on the level of elementary gifted students' argumentation in scientific inquiry. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(4), 441-450.
- McNeill, K. L. & Krajcik, J. (2012). Supporting grade 5-8 students in constructing explanations in science: The claim, evidence and reasoning framework for talk and writing. New York, NY: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
- National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. National Academy of Sciences.
- National Research Council (2002). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. National Academy of Sciences.
- National Research Council (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. National Academy of Sciences.
- Oh, C. & Yang, I. (2009). The features of the observation and the hypothetical faults generated by pre-service elementary teachers on candlelight inquiry tasks: Focusing on usage of the participants' prior knowledge. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 28(2), 93-104.
- Walton, D. N. (1990). What is reasoning? What is an argument? Journal of Philosophy, 87, 399-419. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026735
- Yang, I. & Cho, H. (2006). Review on the aims of laboratory activities in school science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 24(3), 268-280.
Cited by
- 과학 탐구 활동의 유형과 과학 탐구의 특징에 대한 초등 교사의 인식 vol.38, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2019.38.2.163