한국대기환경학회지 (Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment)

  • 제31권4호
  • /
  • Pages.356-367
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1598-7132(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-5346(eISSN)
한국대기환경학회 (Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

우리나라 쇠고기 소비 행태 변화에 의한 이산화탄소 배출 변화량 예측

Prediction of the Carbon Dioxide Emission Change Resulting from the Changes in Bovine Meat Consumption Behavior in Korea

  • 여민주 (이화여자대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 김용표 (이화여자대학교 환경공학과)
  • Yeo, Min Ju (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Yong Pyo (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University)
  • 투고 : 2015.04.14
  • 심사 : 2015.07.02
  • 발행 : 2015.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

A consumption based study on the carbon dioxide ($CO_2$) emission change due to the changes in the bovine meat consumption behavior in Korea was carried out. It was found that if the consumption of bovine meat be reduced by half, the reduction amount of $CO_2$ emissions be over 0.8 $MtCO_2e$ in all senarios in 2023. This amount is equivalent to over 50% of the greenhouse gases (GHGs) emission reduction target in agriculture and forestry, and fishery, a significant reduction. It was also found that the $CO_2$ emission reduction amount in consumption-based approach was the largest when the consumption of the imported bovine meat be reduced, though the difference was not that large.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. BP (British Petroleum) (2014) Statistical Review of World Energy. UK.
  2. Brown, L.R. trans. Edith K.H. Ji, I.W. Lee, S.S. Han, and S.M. Kim (1998) Who will feed China?, Ddanim, Korea.
  3. Browne, D., B. O'Regan, and R. Moles (2008) Use of embodied energy and ecological footprinting to assess the global environmental impact of consumption in an Irish city-region, J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 51 (3), 447-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560801979717
  4. Cleveland, C.J. and C.G. Morris (2009) Dictionary of energy, 1st Ed., Amsterdam.
  5. Davis, S.J. and K. Caldeira (2010) Consumption-based accounting of $CO_2$ emissions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 107(12), 5687-5692. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906974107
  6. DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs) (2006) Environmental impacts of food production and consumption, UK.
  7. EWG (Environmental Working Group) (2011) Meat eaters guide: Methodology, USA.
  8. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2006) Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options, Italy.
  9. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2014a) Production of livestock primary, http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/*/E, accessed November 04, 2014.
  10. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2014b) Trade of crops and livestock products, http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/*/E, accessed November 04, 2014.
  11. GFN (Global Footprint Network) (2014) National Footprint Account, 2012 edition, Oakland, USA.
  12. IEA (International Energy Agency) (2013) $CO_2$ emissions from fuel combustion highlights, 2013 edition, Paris.
  13. Joyce, A., S. Dixon, J. Comfort, and J. Hallett (2012) Reducing the environmental impact of dietary choice: Perspectives from a behavioural and social change approach, J. Environ. Public Health, 978672, 1-7.
  14. KCDCP (Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention) (2013) Korea Health Statistics 2012: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANESV-3), Korea. (in Korean)
  15. KMKE (Korea Ministry of Knowledge Economy) (2010) Study on the energy consumption and the greenhouse gas emissions of food, Korea. (in Korean)
  16. KMOE (Korea Ministry of Environment) (2014) Roadmap for achieving the national GHGs reduction target, Korea. (in Korean)
  17. KOSTAT (Statistics Korea) (2014) Annual livestock consumption amount per capita, http://www.index.go.kr/potal/stts/idxMain/selectPoSttsIdxSearch.do?idx_cd=2747&stts_cd=274712&clas_div=&idx_sys_cd=620&idx_clas_cd=1, accessed July 17, 2014. (in Korean)
  18. KREI (Korea Rural Economics Institute) (2013) Food balance sheet 2012, Korea. (in Korean)
  19. KREI (Korea Rural Economics Institute) (2014) Future agriculture 2014 (I), Korea. (in Korean)
  20. Peters, G.P. (2008) From production-based to consumptionbased national emission inventories, Ecol. Econ., 65(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.014
  21. Pimentel, D. and M. Pimentel (2003) Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 78, 660S-663S.
  22. QIA (Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency) (2015) Status of import of bovine meat by country, http://www.meatwatch.go.kr/cs/dst/bds/selectNvrqsNatReport.do, accessed May 29, 2015. (in Korean)
  23. Sanders, K.T. and M.E. Webber (2014) A comparative analysis of the greenhouse gas emissions intensity of wheat and beef in the United States, Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 044011, 1-9.
  24. SEI (Stockholm Environment Institute) (2010) A consumption approach for emissions accounting - the REAP Tool1 and REAP Data for 2006, Sweden.
  25. SEI (Stockholm Environment Institute) (2012) Low-greenhouse-gas consumption strategies and impacts on developing countries, Sweden.
  26. Takahashi, K., K. Nansai, S. Tohno, M. Nishizawa, J. Kurokawa, and T. Ohara (2014) Production-based emissions, consumption-based emissions and consumption-based health impacts of PM2.5 carbonaceous aerosols in Asia, Atmos. Environ., 97, 406-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.028
  27. Tilman, D. and M. Clark (2014) Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health, Nature, 515, 518-522. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13959
  28. TRUCOST (2013) Natural capital at risk: The top 100 externalities of business, UK.
  29. Williams, A.G., E. Audsley, and D.L. Sandars (2006) Determining the environmental burdens and resource use in the production of agricultural and horticultural commodities, Main Report, Defra Research Project IS0205, Bedford: Cranfield University and Defra.
  30. WRI (World Resources Institute) (2013) Creating a sustainable food future: A menu of solutions to sustainably feed more than 9 billion people by 2050, USA.
  31. Yeo, M.J. and Y.P. Kim (2014) Trend and prediction of the ecological footprint in Korea, J. Environ. Impact Assess., 23, 364-378. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2014.23.5.364

피인용 문헌

  1. Trend and Prediction of Environmental Resources Consumption in the Korean Peninsula vol.25, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2016.25.4.261
  2. Trend and estimation of the ecological footprint from the consumption of bovine meat in Korea vol.25, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2016.25.4.280