Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Haptic Perception Aspect shown in Landscape Architecture before Modernism - Focused on Historical Development Process -

모더니즘 이전 조경에 나타난 촉지적 지각 양상 - 역사적 전개 과정을 중심으로 -

  • Kim, Jin-Seob (Dept. of Environmental Landscape Architecture, Graduate School of Cheongju University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Seon (Dept. of Environmental Landscape Architecture, Cheongju University)
  • 김진섭 (청주대학교 대학원 환경조경학과) ;
  • 김진선 (청주대학교 환경조경학과)
  • Received : 2015.04.29
  • Accepted : 2015.06.24
  • Published : 2015.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the West, of the body's five senses sight is considered the most important but Ocular-centralistic thinking contains many issues. Privileging the subject and inhibiting interaction with the other senses, Ocular-centrism limits the experience of the world to the visual area. However, experiences can be understood as 'touching' various forms and are related to touch. With the heightened interest in the multi-sensuous side of the body contrary to Ocular-centrism, the intervention of the body in the external space has become an important issue in modern landscape architecture. This study explores the possibility of the haptic perception system that causes the active experience of a subject. Haptic perception plays a catalytic role leading an active experience of the subject and the subject experiences a sense of place through such haptic perception. By revealing what was known through the sense of touch through the concurrency and interaction of the various senses, haptic perception draws active participation The haptic perception system has been studied in various fields but has not been studied in the field of landscape architecture. Thus, this study discusses the aspect of haptic perception limited to landscape architecture shown before modernism. In a discussion on haptic perception, the concept of haptic perception is clarified through previous study reviews and literature and the characteristics of haptic perception are derived. Then, the problems of the Ocular-centrism system and the need for haptic perception are discussed. In the historical development process of haptic perception, the change process of the scopic regime is examined chronologically and the ways in which Ocular-centralistic thinking and anti-Ocular-centralistic thinking have been projected on the architecture and landscape architecture of each age are studied via literature and cases studies. The impact of the scopic regime on the landscape architecture field in the historical change process is examined.

서구에서는 인체의 오감 중 시각을 가장 중요하게 여기고 있으나, 시각중심주의적 사고는 많은 문제점을 내포하고 있다. 시각중심주의는 주체를 특권화하며, 다른 감각들과의 상호작용을 억제하면서 세계에 대한 경험을 시각 영역에 한정한다. 그러나 경험은 다양한 양식의 '만짐'으로써 이해될 수 있으며, 감촉성과 관련이 있다. 현대조경에서는 시각중심주의에 반하여 신체의 다감각적 측면에 관심이 고조되면서 외부공간에서 신체의 개입이 중요한 이슈가 되었다. 본 연구는 주체의 능동적 체험을 촉발하는 촉지적 지각 체제에 대한 가능성을 탐구한다. 촉지적 지각은 주체의 능동적 체험을 이끄는 촉매적 역할을 수행하며, 이러한 촉지적 지각을 통해 주체는 장소성을 체험한다. 촉지적 지각은 다양한 감각의 동시성과 상호작용을 통하여 촉각을 통해 알고 있던 것을 드러냄으로써 능동적인 참여를 이끌어낸다. 촉지적 지각 체제는 다양한 분야에서 연구되었으나, 조경 분야에서는 연구가 이루어지지 않았다. 이에 본 연구는 모더니즘 이전에 나타난 조경에 한하여 촉지적 지각의 양상에 관하여 논하고자 한다. 촉지적 지각에 대한 이론적 배경에서는 선행연구 및 문헌 고찰을 통하여 촉지적 지각의 개념을 명확히 하고, 촉지적 지각의 특성을 도출한 연후, 시각중심주의 체제의 문제점과 촉지적 지각의 필요성을 논하다. 촉지적 지각의 역사적 전개 과정에서는 시각 체제의 변화 과정을 시대순으로 살펴보며, 시각중심적 사고와 반-시각중심적 사고가 각 시대의 건축과 조경에 어떻게 투영되었는지를 문헌 및 사례를 통하여 고찰한다. 이후, 시대적 변화 과정에서 시각 체제가 조경 분야에 미친 영향을 고찰한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aha, W. H., Y. H. Jeon and K. S. Oh(2009) A study on design technology of surface in contemporary architecture. Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea 11(2): 29-35.
  2. Alberti, L. B.(1435) Della Pittura. 노성두(역), 알베르티의 회화론. 서울: 사계절, 2001.
  3. Arnheim, R.(1980) "Wie man einen Festkorper wahrnimmt" in Die Dynamil der architektonischen Form. Koln; DuMont Buchverlag, pp. 116-117.
  4. Atkins, R.(1990) Art Speaks. 박진선(역), 현대미술의 개념풀이. 서울: 시공사, 1994.
  5. Aum, K. H.(2004) A Study of Development in Visual Concept of the Late Modern Paintings. Ph. D. Dissertation. Hong-Ik University. Seoul, Korea.
  6. Benevolo, L.(1980) The History of the City, trans. by Geoffery Culverwell, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  7. Benoist-Mechin, J.(1975) L'HOMME ET SON JARDIN. 이봉재(역), 조경진(감수), 정원의 역사. 서울: 르네상스.
  8. Bradbury, M. and J. McFarlane(1976) Modernism, 1890-1930. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
  9. Buci-Glucksmann, C.(1984) La raison baroque: de Baudelaire a Benjamin. Paris: Editions Galilee.
  10. Buci-Glucksmann, C.(1986) La folie du voir: de l'esthetique baroque. Paris: Editions Galilee.
  11. Clark, K.(1960) Looking at Pictures. NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. pp. 16-17.
  12. Crary, J.(1998) Modernizing vision. In H. Foster, Vision and Visuality (pp. 65-90). Seattle, Washington: Bay Press.
  13. Crary, J.(1992) Techiniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Camvridge: MIT Press.
  14. Deleuze, G.(1968) Francis Bacon: Logique de la sensation. Paris: Les Editions de Seuil, 하태환(역), 감각의 논리. 서울: 믿음사, 2008.
  15. Deleuze, G., Guattari, F.(1980) Mille Plateaux: Capialisme et scbizophrerie, Paris: Les Editions de Minuit , 김재인(역), 천개의 고원. 서울: 새물결, 2003. pp. 907-953.
  16. Edgerton, Jr., Damuel Y.(1975) The Renaissance Rediscovery of Linear Perspective. New York: Basic Books.
  17. Foucault, M.(1984) Des Espace Autres. In French Journal Architecture /Mouvement/ Continuite 5:46-49, trans by Jay Miskowiec. Of Other Space: Utopias and Heterotopias.
  18. Frankl, P.(1989) Principles of Architectural History. 김광현(역) 건축 형태의 원리. 서울: 기문당.
  19. Giedion, S.(1967) Time, Space and Architecture. Harvard University Press(5th edition). pp. 31-34.
  20. Gioseffi, D.(1963) Perspective. Encyclopedia of World Art, Vol. XI, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
  21. Gombrich, E. H.(1984) The economy of vision. In E. H. Gombrich, The Sense of Order(pp. 95-97). Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
  22. Harrison, R. P.(2008) Gardens: An Essay on the Human Condition. University of Chicago Press. pp. 105-118.
  23. Houlgate, S.(1993) Vision, reflection, and openness: The "Hegemony of Vision" form a Hegelian Point of View. In D. M. Levin, Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision(pp. 100). University of California Press.
  24. Hwang, K. E.(2011) Interpreting Landscape. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.
  25. Hildebrand, A.(1918), Das Ploblem der Form in der Bildenden Kunst. Strassburg: Heitz, 조창섭(역), 조형미술의형식. 서울: 믿음사, 1989. pp. 20-21.
  26. Ivins, Jr., William M.(1973) On the Rationalization of Sight. New York: Da Capo Press.
  27. Jang, I. Y.(2006) A Study on the Hybrid Tendency in the Contemporary Landscape Design. Ph. D. Dissertation. Cheongju University.
  28. Jay, M.(1993) Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  29. Jay, M.(1998) Scopic regimes of modernity. In H. Foster, Vision and Visuality(pp. 3-23). Seattle, Washington: Bay Press.
  30. Jeon, Y. C. and S. W. Kim(2008) A study on representation techniques of visual tactility in the surface of contemporary architecture. Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design 17(3): 139-147.
  31. Joo, E. W.(2003) Vision and Modernity. Seoul: Hannarae.
  32. Le Corbusier(1930) Precisions: On the Present State of Architecture and City Planning. MIT press(Cambridge, MA).
  33. Lee, E. J.(2009) La formation du pittoresque et le jardin paysager en France. Etudes de la Culture Francaise et de Arts en France 29: 253-284. https://doi.org/10.21651/cfaf.2009.29..253
  34. Lee, J. G.(1997) 근대적 시.공간의 탄생. 파주: 푸른숲.
  35. Levin, D. M.(1993) Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision. University of California Press, 정성철, 백문임(역), 모더니티와시각의헤게모니. 서울: 시각과 언어, 2004. pp. 1-52.
  36. Lynch, D.(2013) Auteurism and Haptic Perception in Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me and Inland Empire, pp. 3.
  37. Matz, C.(1982) The Imaginary Signifier: Psyschoanalysis and the Cinema. Indiana University Press.
  38. McLuhan, M.(1962) The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. University of Toronto Press, Scholarly Publishing Division.
  39. McLuhan, M.(1964) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  40. Pallasmaa, J.(2012) The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. the third edition, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  41. Panofsky, E(1991) Perspective As Symbolic Form. trans, by Christopher S, Wood, New York: Zone Books.
  42. Park, M. Y.(2013) A Study on the Temporality through Haptic Space. Master Thesis, Hongik University.
  43. Park, S. R.(2013) A Study on the Haptic-Visual Phenomena in Peter Zumthor's Architecture. Master Thesis, Seoul National University.
  44. Park, Y. W.(2009) Philo Architecture: Contemporary Architecture & Philosophy. Seoul: 향연.
  45. Pirenne, M. H.(1970) Optics, Painting & Photography. Cambridge University Press.
  46. Poole, G. J.(1972) Architecture andMan's Skyline. NY: Dodd, Mead&Co.
  47. Psarra, S.(2008) Architecture and Narrative: The Formation of Space and Cultural Meaning. London & New York: Routledge. pp. 25-56.
  48. Rasmussen, S. E.(1951) Towns and Buildings. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  49. Riegl, A.(1901) Late Roman Art Industry. trans. Rolf Winkes, Giorgio Bretschneider Editore, Italy, Rome, 1985.(Originally published as Spatromische Kunstindustrie, Vienna, 1901)
  50. Romanyshyn, R. D.(1989) Technology as Symptom and Dream. London & New York: Routledge.
  51. Rose, J.(1986) Sexuality in the Field of Vision. London: Verso. pp. 232-233.
  52. Ryu, J. H. and Y. S. Kim(2007) A study on the expression method of the sublime beauty. Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea 9(2): 17-22.
  53. Scharf, A.(1986) Art and Photography. Penguin Books. 문범(역) 예술과 사진. 서울: 미진사.
  54. Schroer, M.(2006) Raume, Orte, Grenzen: Auf dem Weg zu einer Sozialigie des Raums. Suhrkamp, pp. 36.
  55. Seo, B. R. and Y. K. Oh(2013) A study on the sensibility characteristics in haptic space. Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design 22(5): 162-170.
  56. Sennett, R.(1996) Flesh and Stone: The Body and the City in Western. New York: W.W. Norton.
  57. Smith, M. M(2007) Sensory History. UK: Berg Pub Ltd, 김상훈(역), 감각의 역사. 서울: 사람과 무늬, 2011. pp. 20-21.
  58. Spencer, H.(1975) The Image Maker: Man and His Art. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
  59. Strauss, A. L. and J. Corbin(1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Theory(2en ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  60. Tafuri, M.(1968) Teorie e storia dell' architettura. 김일현(역), 건축의 이론과 역사. 파주: 동녘, 2009. pp. 165-168.
  61. Tuan, Y. F.(1974) Topophilia, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 이옥진(역), 토포필리아. 서울: 에코리브르, 2011.
  62. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GardensofBomarzo