DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

융복합 보유기술이 사업화성과에 미치는 영향

Convergence Held technology commercialization Effects on Performance

  • 전인오 (호서대학교 벤처대학원 경영정보학과)
  • Jeon, In-Oh (Hoseo venture Graduate School of Management and Information Science Major Exhibition Hoseo, Business Administration information)
  • 투고 : 2015.06.16
  • 심사 : 2015.08.20
  • 발행 : 2015.08.28

초록

기업이 융복합을 보유한 기술력에 따라 다양한 사업화 능력을 접목하여 사업화 성과를 높이고, 잠재 기술의 사업화를 확충시키는 방안의 선택이 되도록 하는 것이다. 이에 기업의 융복합 보유기술을 내부기술과 외부기술이 사업화 능력에 따라 기업의 성과인 기술 사업화와 재무성과에 미치는 영향을 분석하고자 한다. 연구의 분석방법은 기술 사업화 기업 240명을 대상으로 수집된 자료를 바탕으로 SPSS 2.0으로 빈도분석, 신뢰도분석, 요인분석, 상관관계 분석, 선형회귀분석을 시행하여 결론을 도출한 결과는 다음과 같다. 외부기술은 자금조달, 내부와 외부기술은 마케팅, 내부외부기술은 생산, 외부는 기술 사업화에 외부기술은 재무성과에 영향을 주는 것으로 조사되었다. 자금조달, 마케팅 능력, 생산기반은 내부기술에서 기술사업 달성도에 완전매개 효과작용을 하고 있으며, 자금조달은 외부기술에서 재무성과에 조절적인 완전매개 효과작용을 하고 있으나 마케팅 능력과 생산능력은 외부기술에서 재무성과에 부분매개 효과작용을 하는 것으로 조사되었다. 시사점으로는 기술 사업화 기술의 용이한 확보방안과 사업화 추진 가능성을 판단한 타당성 검증 과정이 필요하고, 기술 사업화를 지원하면서 다양한 확보 능력별 사업화 성과의 검증이 필요하다. 즉, 사업화함에 따른 제 기법과 자금조달 등 종합적인 지원이 필요하다는 것으로 요약할 수 있을 것이다.

The company's technical reserves in accordance with the internal skills and external technology commercialization capacity and to analyze the impact on the performance of technology commercialization and financial performance of the company. External technology funding, internal and external technologies marketing, internal and external technologies production, outside of the external Technology Commercialization technique was investigated to affect the financial performance. Financing, marketing capability, and the production base is completely mediated effect acting from within the technology business technical achievement, but funding and the regulation of full-mediated effects on the financial performance in the external action, technical marketing skills and capacity of external technology in part mediated effect was investigated by the effect on financial performance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Se-Kyun Kim, Research on small and medium IT venture businesses and technology R & D capabilities of the technology innovation and commercialization capacity, Yonse University Graduate School of doctoral thesis, 2008.
  2. Tae-Hyeon Kim, Study on the technology commercialization process of public research institutions, Hannam University graduate and doctoral thesis, 2006.
  3. Y. H. Bae, Parts enhance innovation capability of the material Industry: Focusing on core businesses, Science and Technology Policy Institute, Policy Research, pp.5-10, 2005.
  4. S. S. Hyeon, Technology Management Research Planning and Evaluation silmuseo for practitioners, Technology Commercialization, the Korea Industrial Technology Association, 2007.
  5. Y. Y. Ik, Impact of market orientation of domestic manufacturers in the marketing ability and performance, Marketing thesis, 14(4), pp.1-24, 2006.
  6. D. S. Lee, Study on the Effect of Korean SMEs in innovation and technology commercialization capacity and management capability, Small Business Association, 31(1), pp65-87, 2011.
  7. S. S. Lee, Technology transfer and commercialization of research and development to promote the final report, Information and Communication, pp55, 2007.
  8. Y. D. Lee, Understanding the technology commercialization, Do nam, 2005.
  9. Won-Mun Lee, Technology commercialization strategies of small and medium IT venture business model development, Konkuk University Graduate School of doctoral thesis, 2008.
  10. C. M. Im, Comparative study on navigation technology transfer and royalty incentives stars, Venture Business Research, 11(3). pp83-102, 2008.
  11. Yong-Hee Ji, Promoting commercialization of new technologies for SMEs, The Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry, pp. 21-26, 1994.
  12. E. G. Choe, A Comparative Study on the corporate strategy group and the management performance differences between the types of skills group, Marketing thesis, 10(1), pp51-72, 2001.
  13. J. R, Bright, 'Practical Technology Forecasting', Technology Future Inc., Austin, TX, 1970.
  14. R.. G.. Cooper, 'Winning at New Products', Addison-Wesley Publishing co., eading, MA, 1986.
  15. Ehrestment, 'the Commercialization of stagnant Technologies', R&D Management 19, 3, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1989.tb00612.x
  16. R.. M. Grant, 'The resource based Theory of Competitive advantage : Implications for strategy Formulation', 1991.
  17. V. K. Jolly, 'Commercializing New Technologies', Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1997.
  18. Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. 'Technological Regimes and Pattems of Innovation' : A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of the Italian case', in Heertjo, A. and perlman, M, Evolving tedmologies and Market Structure, Ann Arber, Michigan University Press, 1990.
  19. Nelson, R. and Winter, S. 'An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Challenge', Cambridge, Mass : Belknap press, 1982.
  20. K. Pavitt, 'Sectoral Patterm of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory', Research policy 13, 1984.
  21. C. K. Prahalad, & G, Hame. 'the core competence of the Corporation', Harvard Business Review, 66, pp.79-91, 1990.
  22. R, Radosevich, and G. S. Smith, ' A model for Entrepreneurship Infrastructure Development in the Creation of Technopolis'. J. B. Sedaitis(ed), Commercializing high Technology : East & West, Rowman & Littlefield pub, 1997.