The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제7권4호
  • /
  • Pages.329-337
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical outcome of double crown-retained implant overdentures with zirconia primary crowns

  • Rinke, Sven (Dental Practice) ;
  • Buergers, Ralf (Department of Prosthetics, University Medical Center Gottingen) ;
  • Ziebolz, Dirk (Department of Cariology, Endodontology and Periodontology, University of Leipzig) ;
  • Roediger, Matthias (Department of Prosthetics, University Medical Center Gottingen)
  • 투고 : 2015.02.23
  • 심사 : 2015.07.17
  • 발행 : 2015.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. This retrospective study aims at the evaluation of implant-supported overdentures (IODs) supported by ceramo-galvanic double crowns (CGDCs: zirconia primary crowns + galvano-formed secondary crown). MATERIALS AND METHODS. In a private practice, 14 patients were restored with 18 IODs (mandible: 11, maxilla: 7) retained by CGDCs on 4 - 8 implants and annually evaluated for technical and/or biological failures/complications. RESULTS. One of the 86 inserted implants failed during the healing period (cumulative survival rate (CSR) implants: 98.8%). During the prosthetic functional period (mean: $5.9{\pm}2.2years$), 1 implant demonstrated an abutment fracture (CSR-abutments: 98.2%), and one case of peri-implantitis was detected. All IODs remained in function (CSR-denture: 100%). A total of 15 technical complications required interventions to maintain function (technical complication rate: 0.178 treatments/patients/year). CONCLUSION. Considering the small sample size, the use of CGDCs for the attachment of IODs is possible without an increased risk of technical complications. However, for a final evaluation, results from a larger cohort are required.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Andreiotelli M, Att W, Strub JR. Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:195-203.
  2. Koller B, Att W, Strub JR. Survival rates of teeth, implants, and double crown-retained removable dental prostheses: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24:109-17.
  3. Verma R, Joda T, Bragger U, Wittneben JG. A systematic review of the clinical performance of tooth-retained and implant-retained double crown prostheses with a follow-up of ${\geq}$ 3 years. J Prosthodont 2013;22:2-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00905.x
  4. Eitner S, Schlegel A, Emeka N, Holst S, Will J, Hamel J. Comparing bar and double-crown attachments in implant-retained prosthetic reconstruction: a follow-up investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:530-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01500.x
  5. Weinlander M, Piehslinger E, Krennmair G. Removable implant-prosthodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: five-year results of different prosthetic anchorage concepts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:589-97.
  6. Krennmair G, Suto D, Seemann R, Piehslinger E. Removable four implant-supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with telescopic crowns or milled bars: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:481-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02169.x
  7. Bernhart G, Koob A, Schmitter M, Gabbert O, Stober T, Rammelsberg P. Clinical success of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1031-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0592-1
  8. Schwarz S, Bernhart G, Hassel AJ, Rammelsberg P. Survival of double-crown-retained dentures either tooth-implant or solely implant-supported: an 8-year retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16:618-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12023
  9. Heckmann SM, Schrott A, Graef F, Wichmann MG, Weber HP. Mandibular two-implant telescopic overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:560-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01064.x
  10. Krennmair G, Seemann R, Weinlander M, Piehslinger E. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:598-606.
  11. Frisch E, Ziebolz D, Rinke S. Long-term results of implantsupported over-dentures retained by double crowns: a practice-based retrospective study after minimally 10 years follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:1281-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02568.x
  12. Frisch E, Ziebolz D, Ratka-Kruger P, Rinke S. Double crown-retained maxillary overdentures: 5-year follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:22-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12087
  13. Romanos GE, May S, May D. Immediate loading of toothimplant-supported telescopic mandibular prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:1534-40.
  14. Weigl P, Hahn L, Lauer HC. Advanced biomaterials used for a new telescopic retainer for removable dentures. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:320-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(2000)53:4<320::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-W
  15. Weigl P, Lauer HC. Advanced biomaterials used for a new telescopic retainer for removable dentures. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:337-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(2000)53:4<337::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO;2-7
  16. Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Gernet W, Naumann M. Parameters affecting retentive force of electroformed double-crown systems. Clin Oral Investig 2010;14:129-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0271-7
  17. Bayer S, Kraus D, Keilig L, Golz L, Stark H, Enkling N. Changes in retention force with electroplated copings on conical crowns: a comparison of gold and zirconia primary crowns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:577-85.
  18. Engels J, Schubert O, Guth JF, Hoffmann M, Jauernig C, Erdelt K, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F. Wear behavior of different double-crown systems. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:503-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0746-9
  19. Raigrodski AJ, Hillstead MB, Meng GK, Chung KH. Survival and complications of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:170-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60051-1
  20. Larsson C, Wennerberg A. The clinical success of zirconiabased crowns: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2014; 27:33-43. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3647
  21. Kurbad A, Reichel K. All-ceramic primary telescopic crowns with Cerec inLab. Int J Comput Dent 2003;6:103-11.
  22. Uludag B, Sahin V, Ozturk O. Fabrication of zirconium primary copings to provide retention for a mandibular telescopic overdenture: a clinical report. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21: 509-10.
  23. Zafiropoulos GG, Rebbe J, Thielen U, Deli G, Beaumont C, Hoffmann O. Zirconia removable telescopic dentures retained on teeth or implants for maxilla rehabilitation. Threeyear observation of three cases. J Oral Implantol 2010;36: 455-65. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00065
  24. Kurbad A, Ganz S, Kurbad S. CAD/CAM generated all-ceramic primary telescopic prostheses. Int J Comput Dent 2012;15:237-49.
  25. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
  26. Albrektsson T, Donos N; Working Group 1. Implant survival and complications. The Third EAO consensus conference 2012. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:63-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02557.x
  27. Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. Quality of reporting of clinical studies to assess and compare performance of implant-supported restorations. J Clin Periodontol 2012;39:139-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01828.x
  28. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:344-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008
  29. Rinke S, Ziebolz D, Ratka-Kruger P, Frisch E. Clinical Outcome of Double Crown-Retained Mandibular Removable Dentures Supported by a Combination of Residual Teeth and Strategic Implants. J Prosthodont 2014 Sep 14.
  30. Rinke S, Ohl S, Ziebolz D, Lange K, Eickholz P. Prevalence of periimplant disease in partially edentulous patients: a practice-based cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22:826-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02061.x
  31. Costa FO, Takenaka-Martinez S, Cota LO, Ferreira SD, Silva GL, Costa JE. Peri-implant disease in subjects with and without preventive maintenance: a 5-year follow-up. J Clin Periodontol 2012;39:173-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01819.x
  32. Pjetursson BE, Helbling C, Weber HP, Matuliene G, Salvi GE, Bragger U, Schmidlin K, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. Periimplantitis susceptibility as it relates to periodontal therapy and supportive care. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:888-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02474.x

피인용 문헌

  1. Implantatgetragene Doppelkronen vol.11, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11838-017-0040-4
  2. Randomized trial investigating zirconia electroplated telescopic retainers: quality of life outcomes vol.21, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1869-1
  3. Electroplated telescopic retainers with zirconia primary crowns: 3-year results from a randomized clinical trial vol.21, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2067-5
  4. Conical zirconia telescoping into electroformed gold: A retrospective study of prostheses supported by teeth and/or implants pp.15230899, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12739
  5. Survival and success of tooth–implant‐supported and solely implant‐supported double‐crown‐retained overdentures: A prospective study over a period of up to 11 years vol.32, pp.12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13842