DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of Asymmetric Aerodynamic Loading on Multiple Unit Floating Offshore Wind Turbine

부유식 다수 풍력 발전기에 작용하는 비대칭 공력 하중의 영향

  • Bae, Yoon Hyeok (Department of Ocean System Engineering, Jeju National University) ;
  • Kim, Moo-Hyun (Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University)
  • 배윤혁 (제주대학교 해양시스템공학과) ;
  • Received : 2015.03.02
  • Accepted : 2015.06.22
  • Published : 2015.06.30

Abstract

The present study developed a numerical simulation tool for the coupled dynamic analysis of multiple turbines on a single floater (or Multiple Unit Floating Offshore Wind Turbine (MUFOWT)) in the time domain, considering the multiple-turbine aero-blade-tower dynamics and control, mooring dynamics, and platform motions. The numerical tool developed in this study was designed based on and extended from the single-turbine analysis tool FAST to make it suitable for multiple turbines. For the hydrodynamic loadings of floating platform and mooring-line dynamics, the CHARM3D program developed by the authors was incorporated. Thus, the coupled dynamic behavior of a floating base with multiple turbines and mooring lines can be simulated in the time domain. To investigate the effect of asymmetric aerodynamic loading on the global performance and mooring line tensions of the MUFOWT, one turbine failure case with a fully feathered blade pitch angle was simulated and checked. The aerodynamic interference between adjacent turbines, including the wake effect, was not considered in this study to more clearly demonstrate the influence of the asymmetric aerodynamic loading on the MUFOWT. The analysis shows that the unbalanced aerodynamic loading from one turbine in MUFOWT may induce appreciable changes in the performance of the floating platform and mooring system.

Keywords

References

  1. ABS, 2014. Guidance Notes on Global Performance Analysis for Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Installation. American Bureau of Shipping, 45-47.
  2. Bae, Y.H., Kim, M.H., 2011. Rotor-floater-mooring Coupled Dynamic Analysis of Mono-column-TLP-type FOWT (Floating Offshore Wind Turbine). Journal of Ocean Systems Engineering, 1(1), 95-111.
  3. Bae, Y.H., Kim, M.H., 2013a. Coupled Dynamic Analysis of FOWT (Floating Offshore Wind Turbine) with Partially Broken Blade. Proceedings of the 23rd International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Anchorage, AK.
  4. Bae, Y.H., Kim, M.H., 2013b. Rotor-floater-tether Coupled Dynamics Including Second-order Sum–frequency Wave Loads for a Mono-column-TLP-type FOWT (Floating Offshore Wind Turbine). Journal of Ocean Engineering, 61, 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.01.010
  5. Bae, Y.H., Kim, M.H., 2014. Coupled Dynamic Analysis of Multiple Wind Turbines on a Large Single Floater. Journal of Ocean Engineering, 92, 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.10.001
  6. Bae, Y.H., Kim, M.H., Q, Yu., 2014. The Dynamic Coupling Effects of a MUFOWT (Multiple Unit Floating Offshore Wind Turbine) with Partially Broken Blade. Proceedings of the 24th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Busan, Korea.
  7. Barltrop, N., 1993. Multiple Unit Floating Offshore Wind Farm. Journal of Wind Engineering, 17(4), 183-188.
  8. Haid, L., Stewart, G., Jonkman, J., Robertson, A., Lackner, M., Matha, D., 2013. Simulation-Length Requirements in the Loads Analysis of Offshore Floating Wind Turbines. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Nantes, France.
  9. Henderson, A.R., Leutz, R., Fujii, T., 2002. Potential for Floating Offshore Wind Energy in Japanese Waters. Proceedings of the 12th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Kitakyushu, Japan.
  10. Henderson, A.R., Zaaijer, M., Bulder, B., Pierik, J., Huijsmans, R., van Hees, M., Snijders, E., Wijnants, G.H., Wolf, M.J., 2004. Floating Windfarms for Shallow Offshore Sites. Proceedings of the 14th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Toulon, France.
  11. Jonkman, J.M., 2003. Modeling of the UAE Wind Turbine for Refinement of FAST_AD. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
  12. Jonkman, J.M., Buhl Jr, M.L., 2004. FAST User’s Guide. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
  13. Jonkman, J.M., 2007. Dynamics Modeling and Loads Analysis of an Offshore Floating Wind Turbine. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
  14. Kane, T.R., 1961. Dynamics of Nonholonomic Systems. Journal of Applied Mechanics 28, 574-578. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3641786
  15. Kim, M.H., Ran, Z., Zheng, W., Bhat, S., Beynet, P., 1999. Hull/mooring Coupled Dynamic Analysis of a Truss Spar in Time Domain. Proceedings of the 9th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Brest, France.
  16. Kim, M.H., Tahar, A., Kim, Y.B., 2001. Variability of TLP Motion Analysis Against Various Design Methodologies/Parameters. Proceedings of the 11th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Stavanger, Norway.
  17. Lefranc, M., Torud, A., 2011. Three Wind Turbines On One Floating Unit Feasibility Design And Cost. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX.
  18. Morison, J.R., Johnson, J.W., Schaaf, S.A., 1950. The Force Exerted by Surface Waves on Piles. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2(05), 149-154. https://doi.org/10.2118/950149-G
  19. Musial, W.D., Butterfield, S., Boone, A., 2004. Feasibility of Floating Platform Systems for Wind Turbines. Proceedings of the 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV.
  20. Tahar, A., Kim, M.H., 2003. Hull/Mooring/Riser Coupled Dynamic Analysis and Sensitivity Study of a Tanker-based FPSO. Journal of Applied Ocean Research, 25(6), 367-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2003.02.001
  21. Tong, K.C., 1998. Technical and Economic Aspects of a Floating Cffshore Wind Farm. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 74(6), 399-410.
  22. Wayman, E., Sclavounos, P., Butterfield, S., Jonkman, J., Musial, W., 2006. Coupled Dynamic Modeling of Floating Wind Turbine Systems. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX.