Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture (한국전통조경학회지)

Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture (한국전통조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison with Factors of Resource Importance for Traditional Village Between Korea and China Using AHP Method

AHP기법을 활용한 韓中(한중) 전통마을의 자원중요도 평가항목 비교

  • Ren, Guang-Chun (Department of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang A & F University) ;
  • Wang, Ai-Xia (Department of Landscape Architecture, Inner Mongolis University of Technology) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Kyung (Department of Environmental Landscape Architecture, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 임광순 (중국절강농림대학교 풍경원림학과) ;
  • 왕애하 (중국내몽고공업대학교 풍경원림학과) ;
  • 김태경 (강릉원주대학교 환경조경학과)
  • Received : 2015.08.14
  • Accepted : 2015.09.02
  • Published : 2015.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study conducted the survey on the resources of traditional villages based on AHP in the subjects with the specialists in Korea and China to seek the resource evaluation standards to apply the preservation and development of traditional villages, and the differences of the importance on the resources among the specialists in both countries. We classified three levels of evaluation items to aim the deductions of the importance and priority in the resources of traditional villages. Upon the analysis results, natural resources were important in the level 1; environmental, historical, facility resources were important in the level 2; and the factors such as air, topography, traditional houses, agricultural landscape, shared community facilities, interchanges between urban and rural areas, family activities, and so on were important in the level 3. The factors that both Korean and Chinese groups evaluated as the most important ones were the same. In terms of overall importance by evaluation items, the factors such as air, water quality, noise, traditional houses, topography, shared community facilities, and so on were rated as relatively important in both Korean and Chinese groups. That is, the traditional villages have the necessity to preserve the cultural resources like their duties, however, it is required to control the natural environment with good quality preferentially. This study results can compare the importance on the resources of traditional village between Korea and China. Moreover, with calculation of the priority and scores for the preservation and management of traditional villages, they are expected to be used as the tool to apply the quantitative data in the evaluation process of traditional village resources in both countries.

본 연구는 전통마을 보전과 개발에 적용할 수 있는 자원 평가기준 및 한국과 중국 전문가들 사이에서 나타나는 전통마을 자원 중요도 차이점을 도출하기 위하여 두 나라 관련 전문가를 대상으로 전통마을 자원에 대하여 AHP기반의 설문조사를 실시하였다. 평가항목은 전통마을 자원의 중요도 및 우선순위 도출을 목표로 3계층으로 구분하였다. 분석결과 Level 1에서는 자연자원, Lavel 2에서는 환경자원, 역사자원, 시설자원, Lavel 3에서는 공기, 지형, 전통주택, 농업경관, 공동생활시설, 도농교류활동, 씨족활동 등의 인자가 중요한 것으로 나타났으며, 한국과 중국 두 그룹에서 가장 중요하다고 평가한 인자는 동일하게 나타났다. 평가항목별 종합적인 중요도는 공기, 수질, 소음, 전통주택, 지형, 공동생활시설 등 인자가 한국과 중국 두 그룹에서 상대적으로 중요한 것으로 나타났다. 즉 전통마을은 문화자원요소들을 보전해야 한다는 필연성을 의무처럼 가지고 있지만 질 좋은 자연환경의 관리가 우선적으로 필요하다. 본 연구의 결과는 한국과 중국 전통마을 자원의 중요도에 대한 비교가 되었을 뿐만 아니라 전통마을의 보전과 관리를 위한 자원별 순위와 배점을 산출함으로써 두 나라 전통마을 자원 평가 시 정량적인 데이터 결과를 각각 적용할 수 있는 방안이 될 것으로 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, D. J.(1994). A Study on the Conservation Methodology for Traditional Villages in Korea. Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture. 22(3): 41-63.
  2. HU, Y. and Chen, S.(2014). The Concept and Cultural Connotation of Traditional Villages. Urban Development Studies. 21(1): 10-13.
  3. Kang, T. S. and Han, S. G.(2000). A Study on The Landscape Charateristic of the Traditional Village. Architectural Institute of Korea. 20(2): 687-690.
  4. Lim, E. J. and Kim, Y. M.(2001). A Study on the Landscape Characteristics of Korean Traditional Villges Located in the Meander Cut-off Area. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 19(4): 24-38.
  5. Shin, S. S.(2007). Research of traditional villages and cultural landscape in Korea. Ilsan: Daega.
  6. Kim, S. J., Park, J. L. and Sim, W. K.(2010). Interpretation of Cultural Landscape based on Community Spaces of Korean Traditional Villages. Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture. 28(4): 14-27.
  7. Park, J. D., Chang, T. H. and Shin, B. C.(2005). A Study on the Types and Characteristics of Roads in a Traditional Korean Village. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 3(-): 67-74.
  8. Hyun, J. Y. and Park, C. Y.(1998). Siting and orientation of traditional housing feng shui in Chosun Dynasty - Case study of Yangdong village. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 16(3): 55-63.
  9. Hyun, J. Y. and Park, C. Y.(1998). Siting and orientation of traditional housing feng shui in chosun Dynasty. Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture. 16(3): 55-62.
  10. Lim, E. J.(2005). A Study on the Feng-shui Characteristics of Korean Traditional Villages Located in the Meander Cut-off Area. Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture. 23(2): 101-115.
  11. Lee, K. S. and Kim, I. J.(1993). A Study on the Formation and Development of a Traclitional Village in San-Cheong. Journal of Architectural history. 2(1) : 9-24.
  12. Yun, Y. H. and Lee, K. E.(1990). The space organization and home garden Style Korean traditional Villages. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape architecture. 18(2): 95-110.
  13. Kim, J. S. and Chung, D. O.(1993). A Study on the Space structure in Korean Traditional Village from Landscape Architecture Viewpoint -With Special Reference to Yeondong, Hainam. Chollanam-Do. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 11(1): 69-88.
  14. Shin, S. S.(2000). A Study on the Environmental Design Principles and Space Organization of Traditional Villages. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 18(1): 20-31.
  15. Kim, S. J., Jung, H. J. and Sim, W. K.(2007). Interpretation of Communal Spaces at Traditional Korean Settlement - with a Special Reference to Hyodong Village, Yeonggwang County, Jeonnam. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 25(3): 94-105.
  16. Shin, S. S. and Huh, J. R.(2002). A Study on the Conservation State and Policy of Traditional Village Landscape. Journal of Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 20(2): 11-22.
  17. Lee, J. Y.(2011). The Concept and the Method of Conservation for the Traditional Korean Settlements - Based on the Case Study in Korea and China. Journal of Architectural history. 20(6): 147-168.
  18. Lee, J. J.(2013). Influence of Satisfaction Factors of Traditional Village Visitor on Whole Satisfaction and Behavior Intention. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 13(3): 402-413. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.03.402
  19. Su, Y. K.(2015). Research on Establishment of Traditional Villages Protection Standard System. Architectural Economic. 36(4): 113-116.
  20. Han, M. X.(2012). Discussion on the Protection of Ancient Village under the Background of New Countryside Construction. Zhejiang Construction. 29(1): 4-6.
  21. Tong, C. L.(2014). The Protection and Development for Traditional Village Against New Urbanization. Architectural and Culture. (2): 109-111.
  22. Li, B. H., Yin, S. and Liu, P. L.(2015). Spatial Distribution of Traditional Villages and the Influencing Factors in Hunan Province. Economic Geography. 35(2): 189-194.
  23. Xue, L. P., Li, B. J. and Bao, H.(2014). Study on the Village of Liuliqu Mentougou District, Beijing. Architectural Culture. 38(3): 144-150.
  24. Sun, C. J. and Liu, B. I.(2014). Investigation on Traditional Villages in Jingxing. Hunnan Agricultural Sciences. (14): 62-64.
  25. Fu, J. and Feng, Z. F.(2014). Historical Evolution Research of Traditional Villages in Guangzhou Area. South Architecture. (4): 64-69.
  26. Yan, S.(2014). Analysis of the Characteristic and Causes of Chinese Traditional Villages' Distribution. Journal of Daliuniversity. 13(9): 25-29.
  27. Bai, P. F.(2011). On the Methods of the Traditional Village Culture. Architectural and Culture. (8): 102-103.
  28. Bi, Z. S. and Li, Y. Z.(2014). An Analysis on Cultural Connotation of Ancient Village-Chengkan Village in Huizhou. Urbanism and Architecture. (8): 194-197.
  29. Roh, Y. H. and Cho, K. I.(2006). Developing Business Performance Indicator a Rural Traditional Theme Village Project: An Application of Analytic Hierarchy Program. The Tourism Sciences Society of Korea. 56(4): 191-209.

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Traditional Color Analysis of Chinese Historic Village - Focus on Cuandixia Village of Mentougou District in Beijing - vol.33, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14700/KITLA.2015.33.4.112