DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on A method to Evaluate Market Dominance Transfer through Bundling Services in a Telecommunication Market

통신시장 결합상품을 통한 지배력 전이 검증 방법에 대한 연구

  • Shin, Minsoo (School of Business, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Iljung (School of Business, Graduate School, Hanyang University)
  • 신민수 (한양대학교 경영대학) ;
  • 김일중 (한양대학교 일반대학원 경영학과)
  • Received : 2015.03.18
  • Accepted : 2015.04.21
  • Published : 2015.06.30

Abstract

The number of contracts for bundling services in a domestic telecommunication market records 1.3 miilion as of the first half year in 2007, and steadily increased to 8.97 million in 2010, to 12.76 million in 2013. In 2014, 70.4% of telecommunication service consumers are found to subscribe to bundling service. Bundling services provide consumers with benefits such as price discount, convenience, increase ARPU. However, a market dominant player in a specific market may transfer its market power to another market by selling bundling services. SSNIP has been adopted to provide a market definition. However, SSNIP is not suitable to measure the effect of market power transition through bundling services because SSNIP cannot measure the effect of changeover sales of bundling services. Thus, in this study, we have investigated the effect of market power transition through bundling services reflecting market power effect and quality upgrade using Gross Upward Market Power Pressure Index metho and reviewed UPP and derivative UPP models.

Keywords

References

  1. 권남훈, "디지털 컨버전스 하에서의 시장획정 문제와 시사점", 정보통신정책연구, 제13권, 제4호(2006), pp.1-28.
  2. 김재영, 양선희, "다매체 다채널 시대, 지상파 방송 규제의 재점검", 방송과 커뮤니케이션, 제7-1호(2006).
  3. 심재한, "혼합형 기업결합 규제의 판단기준", 경쟁법연구, 제9권, 제2호(2010), pp.3-25.
  4. 정보통신정책연구원, "통신서비스 시장지배력 : 정의 및 판단기준", 2004.
  5. 정보통신정책연구원, "통신시장 경쟁상황평가", 2013.
  6. 정보통신정책연구원, "통신시장 경쟁상황평가", 2014.
  7. Bakos, Y. and E. Brynjolfsson, "Bundling and Competition on the Internet," Marketing Science, Vol.19, No.1(2000), pp.63-82. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.19.1.63.15182
  8. BEREC, BEREC report on impact of bundled offers in retail and wholesale market definition, 2010.
  9. BEREC, Commission Recommendation on relevant product and service markets susceptible to ex ante regulation," 2014.
  10. Blanc, G.L., "Bundling Strategies, Competition and Market Structure in the Digital Economy," London School of Economy, 2001.
  11. Bork, R., The Antitrust Paradox, Basic Books, New York, 1978.
  12. Burstein, M.L., "The economics of tie-in sales," Review of Economy and Statistics, Vol.42, No.1(1960), pp.68-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926097
  13. Carbajo, J., D. Meza, and D.J. Seidman, "A Strategic Motivation for Commodity Bundling," Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol.38(1990), pp.283-298. https://doi.org/10.2307/2098499
  14. Choi, J., "Preemptive R&D, Rent Dissipation and the Leverage Theory," Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.110(1996), pp.1153-1181.
  15. Clarke-Smith, J.M., "The Development of the Monopolistic Leveraging Theory and Its Appropriate Role in Antitrust Law," Catholic University Law Review, Vol.52, No.1(2002), pp.179-206.
  16. Daljord, O., L. Sorgard, and O. Thomasseen, "The SSNIP Test and Market Definition with the Aggregate Diversion Ratio : A Reply to Katz and Shapiro," Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, Vol.4, No.2(2008), pp.263-270.
  17. DoJ and FTC, Horizontal Merger Guidelines, 1997.
  18. Drauz, G., P. McGeown, and B. Record, "Recent Developments in EU Merger Control," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Vol.4, No.2(2013), pp.146-161.
  19. EC, "Commission guidelines on market analysis and the assessment of significant market power under the Community regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services," Official Journal of the European Communities, 2002.
  20. EC, E-Communications Household Survey 2014, 2014.
  21. Faratin, P., D. Clark, S. Bauer, and W. Lehr, "The Growing Complexity of Internet Interconnection," Communications and Strategies, No.72(2008), pp.51-71.
  22. Farrell, J. and C. Shapiro, "Antitrust Evaluation of Horizontal Mergers : An Economic Alternative to Market Definition," Competition Policy Center, UC Berkeley, 2008.
  23. Gupta, S. and C.F. Mela, "What is a free customer worth? Armchair calculations of nonpaying customers' value can lead to flawed strategies," Harvard Business Review, Vol.86, No.11(2008), pp.102-109.
  24. Jaffe, S. and E.G., Weyl, "The First-Order Approach to Merger Analysis," American Economic Journal Microeconomic, Vol.5(2013), pp.1-32.
  25. Kaplow, L., "Extension of Monopoly Power Through Leverage," Columbia Law Review, Vol.85, No.3(1985), pp.515-556. https://doi.org/10.2307/1122511
  26. Katz, M.L. and C. Shapiro, "Critical Loss : Let's Tell the Whole Story," Antitrust, Vol.17(2003), pp.49-56.
  27. Katz, M.L. and C. Shapiro, "Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility," The American Economic Review, Vol.75, No.3 (1985), pp.424-440.
  28. Moresi, S., "The Use of Upward Pricing Pressures Indices in Merger Analysis," The Antitrust Source, 2010.
  29. Nalebuff, B., Bundling, Social Science Research Network, 1999.
  30. OECD, Indicators for the assessment of telecommunications competition, 2003.
  31. Oftel, Oftel's Market Review Guidelines : criteria for the assessment of significant market power, 2002.
  32. Oldale, A. and J. Padilla, "EU Merger Assessment of Upward Pricing Pressure : Making Sense of UPP, GUPPI, and the Like," Journal of European Competition Law and Practice, Vol.4, No.4(2013), pp.375-381. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpt042
  33. Pleatsikas, P. and D. Teece, "The Analysis of Market Definition and Market power in the context of Innovation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol.19(2001), pp.665-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(00)00088-6
  34. Salop, S. and S. Moresi, "Updating the Merger Guidelines : Comments," Horizontal Merger Guidelines Review Project, 2009.
  35. Schmalensee, R., "Should New Merger Guidelines Give UPP Market Definition?," Global Competition Review, Vol.19(2009), pp.1-7.
  36. Stremersch, S. and G.J. Tellis, "Strategic Bundling of Products and Prices : A New Synthesis for Marketing," Journal of Marketing, Vol.66(2002), pp.55-72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.1.55.18455
  37. Whinston, M.D., "Tying, Foreclosure, and Exclusion," The American Economic Review, Vol.80, No.4(1990), pp.837-859.
  38. Willig, R., "Unilateral Competitive Effects of Mergers : Upward Pricing Pressure, Product Quality, and Other Extension," Review of Industrial Organization, Vol.39, No.1-2(2011), pp.19-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-011-9307-7