DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A case report of a surgical guide fabricated via intraoral scanning-based implant planning and wax-based rapid prototyping

구강스캐너를 이용한 임플란트 수술 계획 및 왁스 기반 쾌속조형법으로 제작한 수술용 가이드 증례

  • Shin, Jong-Hoon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Park, Eun-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Park, Ji-Man (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University Gwanak Dental Hospital)
  • 신종훈 (이화여자대학교 의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 박은진 (이화여자대학교 의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 박지만 (관악서울대학교치과병원 치과보철과)
  • Received : 2015.06.03
  • Accepted : 2015.07.08
  • Published : 2015.07.31

Abstract

With the recent progress of digital technology, the computer guided surgery utilizing a guide template in the placement of implant has been actively performed, and the method employing the intraoral scanner at the implant prosthesis introduced. Fabrication method of the guide template can be largely classified into design-related rapid prototyping (RP) system and vector milling system, and each of the method has its own weakness in the clinical application despite of excellent accuracy. Thus, in this case study, a working model was fabricated by the wax RP technology using images acquired by CBCT and an intraoral scanner, and the metal bushing was picked up with orthodontic resin cast upon the wax model. Using this method, a surgical guide template was fabricated and used in surgery. From this, we could obtain a satisfactory outcome clinically in the implant placement and the fabrication of the final prostheses and thus report this case herein.

최근 디지털 기술이 발달하면서 임플란트 식립 시 가이드 템플릿을 이용하는 컴퓨터 가이드 수술이 활발하게 이루어지고 있으며, 임플란트 보철시 구강스캐너를 이용하는 방법이 소개되고 있다. 가이드 템플릿의 제작방법은 크게 RP 제작 시스템과 벡터 밀링 시스템으로 나눌 수 있는데, 각각은 우수한 정확성에도 불구하고 임상적 적용에 있어 약간의 아쉬운 점을 보이고 있다. 이에 본 증례에서는 CBCT 및 구강스캐너로 획득한 디지털 영상을 이용하여 쾌속조형법으로 왁스재료의 작업모형을 제작하고 그 위에 교정용 레진으로 금속애관을 픽업해 내는 방법을 사용하여 임플란트 수술용 가이드 템플릿을 제작하여 수술에 사용하였으며, 임상적으로 임플란트 식립 및 최종보철물 제작 시 만족스러운 결과를 얻을 수 있어서 이를 보고하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Fortin T, Champleboux G, Bianchi S, Buatois H, Coudert JL. Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implants based on cone-beam CT-scan images through a robotic drilling machine. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:651-6. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130612.x
  2. Scherer U, Stoetzer M, Ruecker M, Gellrich NC, von See C. Template-guided vs. non-guided drilling in site preparation of dental implants. Clin Oral Investig 2014 Oct 30.
  3. Park JM, Yi TK, Jung JK, Kim Y, Park EJ, Han CH, Koak JY, Kim SK, Heo SJ. Accuracy of 5-axis precision milling for guided surgical template. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2010;48: 294-300. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2010.48.4.294
  4. Park JM, Yi TK, Koak JY, Kim SK, Park EJ, Heo SJ. Comparison of five-axis milling and rapid prototyping for implant surgical templates. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:374-83. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3265
  5. Fortin T, Champleboux G, Lormée J, Coudert JL. Precise dental implant placement in bone using surgical guides in conjunction with medical imaging techniques. J Oral Implantol 2000;26:300-3. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2000)026<0300:PDIPIB>2.3.CO;2
  6. Kim SY, Kim MJ, Han JS, Yeo IS, Lim YJ, Kwon HB. Accuracy of dies captured by an intraoral digital impression system using parallel confocal imaging. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:161-3. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3014
  7. Ender A, Mehl A. In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int 2015;46:9-17.
  8. Talwar N, Chand P, Singh BP, Rao J, Pal US, Ram H. Evaluation of the efficacy of a prosthodontic stent in determining the position of dental implants. J Prosthodont 2012;21:42-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00789.x
  9. Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:234-42.
  10. Youk SY, Lee JH, Park JM, Heo SJ, Roh HK, Park EJ, Shin IH. A survey of the satisfaction of patients who have undergone implant surgery with and without employing a computer-guided implant surgical template. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:395-405. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.5.395
  11. Wismeijer D, Mans R, van Genuchten M, Reijers HA. Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:1113-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12234
  12. Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, Kilpela A, Makynen A. Recent advances in dental optics - Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt Laser Eng 2014;54:203-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.07.017
  13. Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:111-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02430.x