References
- Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1996). Small-Group Discussion in Physics : Peer Interaction Modes in Pairs and Fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1099-1114. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199612)33:10<1099::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-N
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Berland, L., & Lee, V. (2012). In pursuit of consensus: Disagreement and legitimization during small-group argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1857-1882. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.645086
- Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
- Cho, H., & Nam, J. (2014). The Impact of the Argument-based Modeling Strategy using Scientific Writing implemented in Middle School Science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(6), 583-592. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.6.0583
- Clark, D., & Sampson, V. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, 92(3), 447-472. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20276
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-313. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Duschl, R., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187
- Duschl, R., Schweingruber, H., & Shouse, A. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. (2007). Argumentation in science education: an overview. Argumentation in Science Education, 35, 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_1
- Fulwiler, B. (2008). Writing in science: How to scaffold instruction to support learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
- Hand, B., Choi, A., Greenbowe, T., Schroeder, J., & Bennett, W. (2008). Examining the impact of student use of multiple-mode representations in constructing science arguments. annual international conference of National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, MD.
- Hand, B., Hohenshell, L., & Prain, V. (2007). Examining the effect of multiple writing tasks on Year 10 biology students' understandings of cell and molecular biology concepts. Instructional Science, 35, 343 -373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9012-3
- Hsi, S., & Hoadley, C. (1997). Productive Discussion in Science: Gender Equity Through Electronic Discourse. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022564817713
- Jang, K., Nam, J., & Choi, A. (2012). The Effects of Argument-Based Inquiry Using the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) Approach on Argument Structure in Students' Writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(7), 1099-1108. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.7.1099
- Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., Rodriguez, M., & Duschl, R. (2000). "Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F
- Kelly, G., & Chen, C. (1999). The sound of music: Constructing science as a sociocultural practice through oral and written discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 883-915. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199910)36:8<883::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-I
- Kelly, G., & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argument: an analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86(3), 314-342. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10024
- Kelly, G., Regev, J., & Prothero, W. (2007). Analysis of lines of reasoning in written argumentation. Argumentation in science education, 35, 137-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_7
- Keys, C., Hand, B., Prian, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the Science Writing Heuristic as a Tool for Learning from Laboratory Investigations in Secondary Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065-1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I
- Kiuhara, S., Graham, S., & Hweken, L. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 136-160. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013097
- Kollar, I. & Fischer F. (2012). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: a cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 344-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005
- Kuhn, L., & Reiser, B. (2006). Structuring activities to foster argumentative discourse. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
- Kulatunga, U., Moog, R., & Lewis, J. (2013). Argumentation and Participation Patterns in General Chemistry Peer-Led Sessions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1207-1231. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21107
- Kwon, J., & Nam, J. (2013). A Study on the Change of the Beginning Science Teachers' Beliefs About a Lesson and Teaching Practice in Argument-Based Inquiry Using Science Writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(7), 1329-1342. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.7.1329
- Larson, A., Britt, M., & Kurby, C. (2009). Improving students' evaluation of informal arguments. Journal of Experimental Education, 77(4), 339-366. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.77.4.339-366
- Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 525-536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x
- Liu, E., Lin, S., Chiu, C., & Yuan, S. (2001). Web-based peer review: The learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on Education, 44(3), 246-251. https://doi.org/10.1109/13.940995
- Nam, J., Koh, M., Bak, D., Lim, J., Lee, D. & Choi, A. (2011). The Effects of Argumentation-based General Chemistry Laboratory on Preservice Science Teachers' Understanding of Chemistry Concepts and Writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(8), 1077-1091.
- Nam, J., Kwak, K., Jang, K., & Hand, B. (2008). The implementation of argumentation using Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) in Middle School Science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(8), 922-936.
- Nam, J., Lee, D., & Cho, H. (2011). The Impact of Argumentation-based General Chemistry Laboratory Programs on Multimodal Representation and Embeddedness in University Students' Science Writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(6), 931-941.
- National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. (2013). The next generation science standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Osborne, J. (2002). Science without literacy:Aship without a sail? Cambridge Journal of Education, 32, 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640220147559
- Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe. London: Nuffield Foundation.
- Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simmon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 41(10), 994-1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
- Phillips, L., & Norris, S. (1999). Interpreting popular reports of science: What happens when the readers' world meets the world on paper?. International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290723
- Poock, J., Burke, K., Greenbowe, T., & Hand, B. (2007). Using the science writing heuristic in the general chemistry laboratory to improve students academic performance. Journal of Chemical Education, 84, 1371-1378. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed084p1371
- Prain, V., & Hand, B. (1996). Writing for learning in secondary science: Rethinking practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(3), 179-201.
- Purchase, H. (2000). Learning about interface design through peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(4), 341-352.
- Rust, C., Price, M., & O'Donovan, B. (2003). Improving students' learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 147-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301671
- Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Grooms, J., & Witte, S. (2013). Writing to Learn by Learning to Write During the School Science Laboratory: Helping Middle and High School Students Develop Argumentative Writing Skills as They Learn Core Ideas. Science Education, 97(5), 643-670. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21069
- Sandoval, W., & Reiser, B. (2004). Explanation driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345-372. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10130
- Smyth, K. (2004). The benefits of students learning about critical evaluation rather than being summatively judged. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(3), 369-378.
- Spiller, D. (2009). Assessment matters: Self assessment and peer assessment. New Zealand: University of Waikato.
- Tavares, M., Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., & Mortimer, E. (2010). Articulation of conceptual knowledge and argumentation practices by high school students in evolution problems. Science & Education, 19(6-8), 573-598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9206-6
- Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008). The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 186-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005
- Yore, L., Bisanz, G., & Hand, B. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689-725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305018
Cited by
- 실험 설계에서 나타난 소집단 논변활동 탐색: 활동에 대한 인식적 목표와 인식적 이해를 중심으로 vol.36, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.1.0045
- 고등학교 논의기반 탐구 과학수업에서 학생 평가활동이 반성적 사고에 미치는 영향 vol.36, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.2.0347
- Analysis of Error Sources and Estimation of Reliability in Peer Review of Forced Connection Method-Sportscasting by Applying Generalizability Theory vol.27, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.24985/kjss.2016.27.2.345
- 고등학교 논의기반 탐구 과학수업에서 학생 평가활동이 주장과 증거 형성에 미치는 영향 vol.62, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2018.62.3.203
- 자유학기제 과학과 평가에 대한 교사의 인식과 실제 vol.39, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2019.39.1.143
- The Effect of Argument Mapping Supported with Peer Feedback on Pre-Service Teachers' Argumentation Skills vol.37, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2020.1815107