DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

김제 보리-벼 이모작지에서의 순 생물상생산량의 추정

Estimation of Net Biome Production in a Barley-Rice Double Cropping Paddy Field of Gimje, Korea

  • 투고 : 2015.05.14
  • 심사 : 2015.06.29
  • 발행 : 2015.06.30

초록

본 연구는 보리-벼 이모작 작부체계의 논 생태계에 설치한 개방형 $CO_2$ 플럭스시스템과 자동개폐식 챔버형 $CH_4$ 측정시스템에서 관측된 탄소관련 온실가스 자료와 작물 생장량자료를 활용하여 논 생태계의 연간(2012.10.20~2013.10.21) 탄소수지를 분석하였다. 결론적으로 농작물의 생육인자와 환경인자는 $CO_2$의 순 생태계교환량(NEE)에 영향을 주는 것으로 분석되었고, $CH_4$ 배출량은 영농활동(특히 물관리)에 따라 큰 영향을 받는 것으로 분석되었다. 2012~2013년 벼-보리 이모작 작부체계의 논 생태계에서 보리 재배기간에는 단위면적($m^2$)당 100.2g의 탄소를 흡수하고 벼 재배기간에는 $m^2$당 374.1g의 탄소를 흡수하였지만, 휴경기간에는 토양호흡의 형태로 $m^2$당 41.2g의 탄소를 배출하여 연간 총 $433.1g\;m^{-2}$의 탄소를 흡수하는 것으로 분석되었다. 여기에 농작물의 수확에 따른 논 생태계의 탄소 배출량과 $CH_4$ 형태로배출되는 탄소량을 포함한 연간 순생물상생산량(NBP)은 $184.7g\;C\;m^{-2}$으로 추정되어, 보리-벼 이모작 작부체계의 논 생태계는 탄소 발원인 것으로 평가되었다.

Fluxes of carbon dioxide ($CO_2$) were measured above crop canopy using the Eddy Covariance (EC) method, and emission rate of methane ($CH_4$) was measured using Automatic Open/Close Chamber (AOCC) method during the 2012-2013 barley and rice growing season in a barley-rice double cropping field of Gimje, Korea. The net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of $CO_2$ in the paddy field was analyzed to be affected by crop growth (biomass, LAI, etc.) and environment (air temperature, solar radiation, etc.) factors. On the other hand, the emission rate of $CH_4$ was estimated to be affected by water management (soil condition). NEE of $CO_2$ in barley, rice and fallow period was -100.2, -374.1 and $+41.2g\;C\;m^{-2}$, respectively, and $CH_4$ emission in barley and rice period was 0.2 and $17.3g\;C\;m^{-2}$, respectively. When considering only $CO_2$, the barley-rice double cropping ecosystem was estimated as a carbon sink ($-433.0g\;C\;m^{-2}$). However, after considering the harvested crop biomass ($+600.3g\;C\;m^{-2}$) and $CH_4$ emission ($+17.5g\;C\;m^{-2}$), it turned into a carbon source ($+184.7g\;C\;m^{-2}$).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alberto, M. C. R., R. Wassmann, T. Hirano, A. Miyata, A. Kumar, A. Padre, and M. Amante, 2009: $CO_2$/heat fluxes in rice field: Comparative assessment of flooded and nonflooded fields in the Philippines. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 149, 1737-1750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.06.003
  2. Bartlett, K. B., and R. C. Harris, 1993: Review and assessment of $CH_4$ emissions from wetlands. Chemosphere 26, 211-230.
  3. Balogh, J., Z. Nagy, Sz. Foti, K. Pinter, Sz. Czobel, E. R. Peli, M. Acosta, M. V. Marek, Zs. Csintalan, and Z. Tuba, 2007: Comparison of $CO_2$ and $H_2O$ fluxes over grassland vegetations measured by the eddy-covariance technique and by open system chamber. Photosynthetica 45(2), 288-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-007-0046-9
  4. Baldocchi, D., E. Falge, L. Gu, R. Olson, D. Hollinger, S. Running, P. Anthoni, Ch. Bernhofer, K. Davis, R. Evans, J. Fuentes, A. Goldstein, G. Katul, B. Law, X. Lee, Y. Malhi, T. Meyers, W. Munger, W. Oechel, U. K. T. Paw, K. Pilegaard, H. P. Schmid, R. Valantini, S. Verma, T. Vesala, K. Wilson, and S. Wofsy, 2001: FLUXNET: A new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystemscale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 82(11), 2415-2434. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<2415:FANTTS>2.3.CO;2
  5. Bhattacharyya, P., S. Neogi, K. S. Roy, and K. S. Rao, 2012: Gross primary production, ecosystem respiration and net ecosystem exchange in Asian rice paddy: an eddy covariance-based approach. Current Science 104(1), 67-75.
  6. Bonnevillea, M. C., I. B. Strachan, E. R. Humphreys, and N. T. Roulet, 2008: Net ecosystem $CO_2$ exchange in a temperate cattail marshin relation to biophysical properties. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 148, 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.09.004
  7. Campbell, C. S., J. L. heilman, K. J. Mclnnes, L. T. Wilson, J. C. Medley, W. Guowei, and R. C. Douglas, 2001: Diel and seasonal variation in $CO_2$ flux of irrigated rice. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 108(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(01)00225-8
  8. Clement, R. J., P. G. Jarvis, and J. B. Moncrieff, 2012: Carbon dioxide exchange of a Sitka spruce plantation in Scotland over five years. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 153, 106-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.07.012
  9. Ferlan, M., G. Alberti, K. Eler, F. Bati, A. Peressotti, F. Miglietta, A. Zaldei, P. Simoncic, and D. Vodnik, 2011: Comparing carbon fluxes between different stages of secondary succession of a karst grassland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 140, 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.003
  10. Field, C. B., J. T. Ball, and J. A. Berry, 1989: Photosynthesis: Principles and field techniques. In: R. W. Pearcy, H. A. Mooney, J. R. Ehleringer, and P. W. Rundel, editors, Plant Physiological Ecology: Field Methods and Instrumentation, Chapman and Hall, London, 209-253.
  11. Hutchinson, G. L., and G. P. Livingston, 1993: Use of chamber systems to measure traces gas fluxes. In: L. A. Haper et al., editors, Agricultural ecosystem effects on trace gases and global climate change, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 63-78.
  12. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1992: Manual on measurement of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from agricultrue organization of the Untited Nations and the International Atomic Energy Agency, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1-91.
  13. IPCC, 2007: Climate change 2007: Mitigation, contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, 168pp.
  14. Khalil, M., and R. J. Rasmussen, 1983: Sources, sinks and seasonal cycles of atmospheric methane. Journal of Geophysical Research 103, 5131-5144.
  15. Lee, X., W. Massman, and B. Law, 2004: Handbook of Mirometeorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dorderch, The Netherlands, 250pp.
  16. McCaughey, J. H., M. R. Pejam, M. A. Arain, and D. A. Cameron, 2006: Carbon dioxide and energy fluxes from a boreal mixedwood forest ecosystem in Ontario, Canada. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 140, 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.08.010
  17. Min, S. H., K. M. Shim, Y. S. Kim, M. P. Jung, S. C. Kim, and K. H. So, 2013: Seasonal variation of carbon dioxide and energy fluxes during the rice cropping season at ricebarley double cropping paddy field of Gimje. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 15(4), 273-281. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2013.15.4.273
  18. Min, S. H., K. M. Shim, Y. S. Kim, H. Hwang, M. P. Jung, and I. T. Choi, 2014: Seasonal variation of $CO_2$ exchange during the barley growing season at a rice-barley double cropping paddy field of Gimje. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 16(2), 137-145. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2014.16.2.137
  19. Miyata, A., R. Leuning, O. T. Denmead, J. Kim, and Y. Harazono, 2000: Carbon dioxide and methane fluxes from an intermittently flooded paddy field. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 102(4), 287-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00092-7
  20. Papale, D., M. Reichstein, M. Aubinet, E. Canfora, C. Bernhofer, W. Kutsch, B. Longdoz, S. Rambal, R. Valentini, T. Vesala, and D. Yakir, 2006: Towards a standardized processing of Net Ecosystem Exchange measured with eddy covariance technique: algorithms and uncertainty estimation. Biogesciences 3, 571-583. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-3-571-2006
  21. Reichstein, M., E. Falge, D. Baldocchi, D. Papale, M. Aubinet, P. Berbigier, C. Bernhofer, N. Buchmann, T. Gilmanov, A. Granier, T. Grunwald, K. Havrankova, H. Ilvesniemi, D. Janous, A. Knohl, T. Laurila, A. Lohila, D. Loustau, G. Matteucci, T. Meyers, F. Miglietta, J. M. Ourcival, J. Pumpanen, S. Rambal, E. Rotenberg, M. Sanz, J. Tenhunen, G. Seufert, F. Vaccari, T. Vesala, D. Yakir, and R. Valentini, 2005: On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration review and improved algorithm. Global Change Biology 11(9), 1424-1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001002.x
  22. Saito, M., A. Miyata, H. Nagai, and T. Yamada, 2005: Seasonal variation of carbon dioxide exchange in rice paddy field in Japan. Agricutural and Forest Meterology 135, 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.10.007
  23. Soejima, H., S. Tamizi, and I. Kuni, 1995: Changes in the chlorophyll contents of leaves and in levels of cytokinins in root exudates during ripening of rice cultivars Nipponbare and Akenohoshi. Plant and Cell Physiology 36(3), 1105-1114. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a078854
  24. Takimoto, T., T. Iwata, S. Yamamoto, and T. Miura, 2010: Characteristics of $CO_2$ and $CH_4$ flux at barley-rice double cropping field in southern part of Okayama. Japanese Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 66(3), 181-191. https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.66.3.5
  25. Veenendaal, E. M., O. Kolle, P. A. Leffelaar, A. Schrier- Uijl, J. van Huissteden, J. D. van Walsem, F. Moller, and F. Berendse, 2007: $CO_2$ exchange and carbon balance in two grassland sites on eutrophic drained peat soils. Biogeosciences 4(6), 1027-1040. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-1027-2007
  26. Webb. E. K., G. I. Pearman, and R. Leuning, 1980: Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapor transfer. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorology Society 106(447), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49710644707
  27. Wilczak, J. M., S. T. Oncley, and S. T. Stage, 2001: Sonic anemometer tilts correction algotithms. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 99(1), 127-150. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018966204465
  28. Yagi, K., T. Haruo, K. Kenichi, and M. Katsuyuki, 1996: Effect of water management on methane emission from a Japanese rice paddy field: Automated methane monitoring. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 10(2), 255-267. https://doi.org/10.1029/96GB00517
  29. Yang, S. S., and H. L. Chang, 2001: Methane emission from paddy fields in Taiwan. Biology and Fertility of Soils 33, 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740000306

피인용 문헌

  1. Comparison of Carbon Budget between Rice-barley Double Cropping and Rice Mono Cropping Field in Gimje, South Korea vol.18, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2016.18.4.337
  2. Modeling gross primary production of paddy rice cropland through analyses of data from CO 2 eddy flux tower sites and MODIS images vol.190, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.11.025
  3. Evaluation of Carbon Balance for Carbon Sink/Emission with Different Treatments in Paddy Field vol.35, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2017.35.4.715