DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

수치해석을 이용한 토목섬유망 네일의 사면보강에 대한 적용성 연구

Applicability Study of Geotextile Mesh Soil Nail on Slope Reinforcement Using Numerical Analysis

  • 유광호 (수원대학교 공과대학 토목공학과) ;
  • 정연학 (수원대학교 공과대학 토목공학과) ;
  • 하지영 (한국화학융합시험연구원)
  • 투고 : 20150431
  • 심사 : 2015.05.15
  • 발행 : 2015.06.30

초록

본 연구에서는 일반적인 쏘일네일링이 야기할 수 있는 환경문제를 줄이고, 경제성과 시공성을 향상하기 위해 토목섬유망 네일의 사면 적용성을 수치해석을 통해 평가하였다. 이를 위해 일반 네일과 토목섬유망 네일의 현장 인발시험을 수행하여 각 네일의 인발특성을 분석하였다. 또한 유한차분법을 이용하여 수치모델링의 적합성을 검증하고, 네일과 지반조건에 대한 매개변수를 선정하여 사면 안정성 평가를 위한 민감도분석을 수행하였다. 추가로 실무에서 사면안정해석을 위해 널리 사용되고 있는 한계평형법을 이용한 분석을 수행하였다. 연구 결과, 직경이 동일하다면 토목섬유망 네일로 보강한 사면과 일반네일로 보강한 사면은 안정성 측면에서 큰 차이가 없었다. 따라서 일반 네일로 보강된 사면만큼의 안정성 확보가 가능하며, 경제성과 시공성이 뛰어난 토목섬유망 네일이 사면보강을 위해 효율적으로 사용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

In this study, the applicability of geotextile mesh soil nails on slopes was evaluated by numerical analysis to reduce environmental problems which a general soil nailing might produce and to improve its economical efficiency and construction convenience. To this end, in situ pull-out tests were conducted for both general soil nail and geotextile mesh soil nail and their pull-out characteristics were analyzed. Also, finite difference method was used to verify the suitability of numerical simulation. Parameters for nail and ground conditions were selected and sensitivity analysis was performed for the evaluation of slope stability. In addition, analysis was performed by limit equilibrium method which is widely used for slope stability analysis in practice. As a result, if the nail diameter was same, there is no big difference between geotextile mesh soil nails and general soil nails in terms of slope stability. Therefore it can be expected that geotextile mesh soil nails could be effective for slope reinforcement since they could keep a slope as stable as general soil nails and give better economical efficiency and construction convenience than general soil nails.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., 2005, Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua, Ver. 5.0, Itasca Consulting Group, Minnesota, USA.
  2. Kim, H.R., 2002, A Study on the Evaluation of Reinforcement Force in the Reinforced Soil Structure Using Strain Gauge, Master's dissertation, Chonbuk National University, 69p.
  3. Kim, H.T., Lee, H.J., Jung, W.C. and Koh, H.S., 2006, An estimation on the applicability of hollow FRP soil nailing system, Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 26, No. 6, 385-393
  4. Kim, K.S., 2013, A Comparative Case Study on the Analysis Method for Slope Stability Estimation of Plane and Circular Failures, Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Suwon, 145p.
  5. Korea Testing and Research Institute, 2013, Patent Technology Evaluation Report : Flexible Soil-nails and Flexible Soil-nailing Method, No. 10-1060286, 103p.
  6. Korean Geotechnical Society, 1997a, Series of Geotechnical Engineering 1 : Interpretation and Use of Site Investigation Results, Goomiseogwan, 734p.
  7. Korean Geotechnical Society, 1997b, Series of Geotechnical Engineering 3 : Excavation and Earth Retaining Method, Goomiseogwan, 670p.
  8. Lee, D.Y. and Kim, S.K., 2014, A study of geosynthetic soil nailing method using pull out test, 2014 Conference Proceedings of Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 1093-1094.
  9. Min, K.S., 2013, A Study on Soil Nailing Support Pattern of Circular Failure Slopes by Finite Differences Analysis, Master's dissertation, The University of Suwon, 73p.
  10. Park, Y.J. and You, K.H., 1998, Stability analysis for jointed rock slope using ubiquitous joint model, Tunnel and Underground Space, Korean Society for Rock Mechanics, Vol. 8, No. 4, 287-295.
  11. Promotion Planning Office for Hub City of Asian Culture, 2006, Geological Investigation Report for Construction Site of the Asian Culture Complex, Ministry of Cultures and Tourism, 88p.
  12. You, K.H., Kim, H.R., Jung, Y.H. and Ha, J.Y., 2014, A characteristic analysis of a geotextile mesh nail by filed pull-out tests, 2014 Conference Proceedings of Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 571-572.