Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering (산업경영시스템학회지)

Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering (한국산업경영시스템학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Non-Oriented DEA Game Cross Efficiency Model for Supplier Selection

비방향 DEA 게임 교차효율성을 이용한 공급업체 선정방법

  • Lim, Sungmook (Dongguk Business School, Dongguk University-Seoul)
  • 임성묵 (동국대학교-서울캠퍼스 경영대학 경영학부)
  • Received : 2015.05.08
  • Accepted : 2015.05.27
  • Published : 2015.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study intends to propose a non-oriented DEA based game cross-efficiency approach for supplier selection. With a discussion on the choice of DEA models and approaches that are most appropriate for supplier selection, we propose a game cross efficiency model based upon the non-oriented variable returns-to-scale RAM DEA by adapting the existing game cross efficiency model based upon the oriented constant returns-to-scale CCR DEA. We develop the RAM game cross efficiency model and a convergent iterative solution procedure to find the best game cross efficiency scores that constitute a Nash equilibrium. We illustrate the proposed model with two data sets of supplier selection, and demonstrate that significantly different results are obtained when compared with the existing approaches.

Keywords

References

  1. Andreson, P. and Petersen, N.C., A procedure for ranking efficient unit in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 1993, Vol. 39, pp. 1261-1294. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
  2. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W.W., Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 1984, Vol. 30, pp. 1078-1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  3. Bayazit, O., Use of analytic network process in vendor selection decisions. Benchmarking : An International Journal, 2006, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 566-579. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770610690410
  4. Becker, R.A. and Chakrabarti, S.K., Satisficing behavior, Brouwer's fixed point theorem and Nash equilibrium. Economic Theory, 2005, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 63-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-004-0519-z
  5. Chan, F.T.S., Chan, H.K., Ip, R.W.L., and Lau, H.C.W., A decision support system for supplier selection in the airline industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B-Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2007, Vol. 221, No. 4, pp. 741-758. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM629
  6. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  7. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Golany, B., Seiford, L.M., and Stutz, J., Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics, 1985, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(85)90133-2
  8. Cooper, W.W., Park, K.S., and Pastor, J.T., RAM : A range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1999, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 5-42. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007701304281
  9. Debreu, D., A social equilibrium existence theorem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1952, Vol. 38, pp. 886-893. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.38.10.886
  10. Doyle, J. and Green, R., Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA : Derivations, meanings and uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1994, Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 567-578. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1994.84
  11. Falagario, M., Sciancalepore, F., Costantino, N., and Pietroforte, R., Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public procurement tenders. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, Vol. 218, No. 2, pp. 523-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.10.031
  12. Gencer, C. and Gurpinar, D., Analytic network process in supplier selection : A case study in an electronic firm. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 2007, Vol. 31, No. 11, pp. 2475-2486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2006.10.002
  13. Glicksberg, I.L., A further generalization of the Kakutani fixed point theorem with application to Nash equilibrium points. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1952, Vol. 38, pp. 170-174.
  14. Green, R.H., Doyle, J.R., and Cook, W.D., Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, Vol. 90, No. 3, pp. 461-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00039-9
  15. Ho, W., Xu, X., and Dey, P.K., Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection : A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, Vol. 202, No. 1, pp. 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009
  16. Hong, G.H., Park, S.C., Jang, D.S., and Rho, H.M., An effective supplier selection method for constructing a competitive supply-relationship. Expert Systems with Applications, 2005, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 629-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2004.12.020
  17. Hou, J. and Su, D., EJB-MVC oriented supplier selection system for mass customization. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2007, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 54-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380710717643
  18. Liang, L., Wu, J., Cook, W.D., and Zhu, J., The DEA game cross-efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium. Operations Research, 2008, Vol. 56, No. 5, pp. 1278-1288. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1070.0487
  19. Lim, S., Oh, K.W., and Zhu, J., Use of DEA cross-efficiency evaluation in portfolio selection : An application to Korean stock market. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, Vol. 236, No. 1, pp. 361-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.12.002
  20. Narasimhan, R., Talluri, S., and Mahapatra, S.K., Multiproduct, multicriteria model for supplier selection with product life-cycle considerations. Decision Sciences, 2006, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 577-603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00139.x
  21. Ng, W.L., An efficient and simple model for multiple criteria supplier selection problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, Vol. 186, No. 3, pp. 1059-1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.018
  22. Oral, M., Kettani, O., and Lang, P., A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects. Management Science, 1991, Vol. 37, No. 7, pp. 871-885. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.7.871
  23. Sexton, T.R., Silkman, R.H., and Hogan, A.J., Data envelopment analysis : Critique and extensions. In Measuring efficiency : An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, 73-104, Jossey-Bass, SanFrancisco, 1986.
  24. Talluri, S. and Narasimhan, R., A note on a methodology for supply base optimization. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2005, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 130-139. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2004.839960
  25. Talluri, S., Narasimhan, R., and Nair, A., Vendor performance with supply risk : A chance-constrained DEA approach, International Journal of Production Economics, 2006, Vol. 100, No. 2, pp. 212-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.012
  26. Thompson, R.G., Langemeier, L.N., Lee, C.T., Lee, E., and Thrall, R.M., The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming. Journal of Econometrics, 1990, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90049-Y
  27. Tone, K., A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, Vol. 130, No. 3, pp. 498-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5
  28. Wadhwa, V. and Ravindran, A.R., Vendor selection in outsourcing. Computers and Operations Research, 2007, Vol. 34, No. 12, pp. 3725-3737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2006.01.009
  29. Wise, R. and Morrison, D., Beyond the exchange: The future of B2B. Harvard Business Review, 2000, Vol. 78, No. 6, pp. 86-96.
  30. Wu, T., Shunk, D., Blackhurst, J., and Appalla, R., AIDEA : A methodology for supplier evaluation and selection in a supplier-based manufacturing environment. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 2007, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 174-192. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMTM.2007.013190