Research in Plant Disease (식물병연구)

The Korean Society of Plant Pathology (한국식물병리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Virulence Test Methods for Neck and Panicle Blast Disease

벼에 발생하는 목 도열병 및 이삭 도열병 검정을 위한 실험방법 개발

  • 지명환 (사무엘노블연구소) ;
  • 박숙영 (순천대학교 한국지의류연구센터)
  • Received : 2015.05.21
  • Accepted : 2015.06.05
  • Published : 2015.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Isolates of the rice blast fungus show a range of tissue-specificities infecting leaves, nodes, neck and panicles. Although neck and panicle blast cause significantly greater yield losses than the leaf blast, virulence tests of the blast isolates have been performed only rice leaves instead of neck and panicles. In this study, we have developed a virulence test method for neck and panicle blast. We selected three representative isolates from each of leaf, neck, and panicle blast. We observed that severe disease lesions developed on the neck and the panicles when the infected rice plants were incubated in a dew chamber for 48 h instead of 24 h when tested on leaves. Unlike the leaf blast, a typical lesion on the neck and panicles appeared after 14 days post-infection as opposed to 7 days with leaf blast. This method will be applied to examine tissue-specificity of the rice blast fungus isolates.

벼 도열병은 벼의 조직에 따라서 잎, 마디, 목, 그리고 이삭의 병징에 의해 특성화된다. 심각한 수량 손실이 잎 도열병 보다는 목도열병과 이삭도열병이 원인이 됨에도 불구하고, 분리된 균주의 병원력 검정은 목과 이삭 대신 잎에서 수행되었다. 이 연구에서 우리는 목과 이삭 도열병을 위한 병원성 검정 방법을 개발하였다. 병원력 검정을 위해, 잎, 목, 그리고 이삭 도열병으로 부터 각각 3개의 대표균주를 선발하였다. 벼에 도열병균을 접종한 후 48시간 동안 고습도생장상에서 두었을 때, 24시간보다 목과 이삭에서 높은 발병률을 보였다. 잎 도열병 검정과 다르게, 목과 이삭에서의 전형적인 병반은 접종 14일 후 나타났다. 이 연구방법은 앞으로 벼 도열병의 벼 조직 별 병원성 검정방법을 위해 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Agrios, G. N. 1997. Plant Pathology. 4th ed. Academic, San Diego.
  2. Bourett, T. M. and Howard, R. J. 1990. In vitro development of penetration structure in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Can. J. Bot. 68: 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1139/b90-044
  3. Hamer, J. E., Howard, R. J., Chumley, F. G. and Valent, B. 1988. A mechanism for surface attachment in spores of a plant pathogenic fungus. Science 239: 288-290. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.239.4837.288
  4. Han, S. S., Ra, D. S., Choi, S. H. and Kim, C. K. 1997. Population dynamics of Pyricularia grisea during leaf and panicle blast stages in the same field. Korean J. Plant Pathol. 13: 408-415. (In Korean)
  5. Khang, C. H., Berruyer, R., Giraldo, M., Kankanala, P., Park, S.-Y., Czymmek, K., Kang, S. and Valent, B. 2010. Translocation of Magnaporthe oryzae efferctors into rice cells and their subsequent cell-to-cell movement. Plant Cell 22: 1388-1403. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.069666
  6. Mosquera, G., Giraldo, M., Khang, C. H., Coughlan, S. and Valent, B. 2009. Interaction transcriptome analysis identifies Magnaporthe oryzae BAS1-4 as biotrohpy-associated secreted proteins in rice balst disease. Plant Cell 21: 1273-1290. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.107.055228
  7. Ou, S. H. 1985. Rice Diseases. Kew, UK: Commonwealth Mycological Institute.
  8. Ou, S. H. and Ayad, M. R. 1967. Pathogenic races of Pyricularia oryzae origniating from single lesions and monoconidial cultures. Phytopathology 58: 179-182.
  9. Ra, D. S., Han, S. S. and Kim, C. K. 1994. Temporal and spatial blast incidence in leading cultivars and elite lines of rice in Korea. Korean J. Plant Pathol. 10: 47-53. (In Korean)
  10. Ra, D. S., Ryu, J. K. and Han, S. S. 1993. Improvement of rice blast control by cultivation of selected cultivars with partial resistance. Korean J. Plant Pathol. 9: 206-212. (In Korean)
  11. Valent, B., Farrall, L. and Chumley, F. G. 1991. Magnaporthe grisea genes for pathogenicity and virulence identified through a series of backcrosses. Genetics 127: 87-101.
  12. Wibowo, B. S. 2011. Sebaran dan perkembangan OPT padi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penyakit Tungro. Makassar, Indonisia.