Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Spectrophotometic analysis of the influence of substrate on the color of dental ceramics

하부구조물 및 두께에 따른 치과 수복용 세라믹의 색조에 대한 분광측색분석

  • Song, Young-Gyun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 송영균 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2015.05.11
  • Accepted : 2015.05.22
  • Published : 2015.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to spectrophotometrically evaluate the influence of porcelain layer thickness and substructure. Materials and Methods: Four groups of porcelain specimens (metal and ceramic substructure) was prepared for analysis. Color parameters were measured with spectrophotometer and color difference (${\Delta}E*$) were calculated. T-test and one-way ANOVA test were used to find out significant difference and Tukey test was used to identify where the difference ware. Results: Increasing the thickness of porcelain decreased values (P < 0.05). Increasing the thickness of porcelain on ceramic substructure decreased the $a^*$ (P < 0.05) but, the $b^*$ were not statistically different. Total color difference (${\Delta}E*$) were below 1 when the difference of porcelain thickness were 0.5 mm. Conclusion: The thickness of porcelain are the factor effecting on color. This study will help the color are controlled by changing the thickness of porcelain clinically.

목적: 본 연구는 하부구조물과 축성된 도재의 두께 차이에 따른 색상의 차이를 비교연구하여 보고자 함이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 금속하부구조물과 완전도재 하부구조물위에 0.5 mm 간격으로 도재의 두께를 다르게 축성을 한 후에 spectrophotometer를 이용하여, 색상을 측정하였다. 이후 측색값과 ${\Delta}E*$값을 통계학적으로 비교 분석하였다. 결과: 도재의 두께가 증가함에 따라 명도가 감소하였다(P < 0.05). 세라믹 하부구조물의 경우 축성된 도재의 두께가 증가할수록 $a^*$값이 감소였으나(P < 0.05), 두께는 $b^*$값에 유의한 영향을 주지 않았다. 도재 두께 차이가 0.5 mm 이하일 경우 ${\Delta}E*$값이 1이하였다. 결론: 하부구조물의 종류에 따라 차이가 있으나, 도재의 두께가 색상에 영향을 주는 요소이며, 두께에 따른 색조 변화 양상의 인지를 통하여, 임상에서 도재 두께변화를 이용한 색상조절에 도움이 될 것이라 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Rhu SY, Lee JH, Cho IH. A study on the color stability of porcelain for porcelain fused to metal crown. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2000;38:73-84.
  2. Paravina RD, Powers JM, Fay RM. Color comparison of two shade guides. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:73-8.
  3. Campbell SD. A comparative strength study of metal ceramic and all ceramic esthetic materials: modulus of rupture. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:476-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90184-4
  4. Crispin BJ, Jo YH, Hobo S. Esthetic ceramic restorative materials and techniques. In: Crispin BJ, editor. Contemporary esthetic dentistry: practice fundamentals. Chicago; Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1994. p. 155-188.
  5. Paul S, Peter A, Pietrobon N, Hammerle CH. Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dent Res 2002;81:578-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100815
  6. Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. II. Practical application for the organization of color. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:556-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90036-X
  7. Asano S, Yamamoto M. Optimal tooth shade verification technique. QDT 2002;5:30-57.
  8. Paravina RD. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparatus. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:528-34.
  9. Kim CS, Lim JS, Jung CM, Jeon YC. Colorimetric analysis of color differences between dentin porcelains. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1999;37:425-32.
  10. Seleski CG. Color, light, and shade matching. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:263-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90033-9
  11. Goldstein GR, Schmitt GW. Repeatability of a specially designed intraoral colorimeter. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:616-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90292-V
  12. Seghi RR. Effects of instrument-measuring geometry on colorimetric assessments of dental porcelains. J Dent Res 1990;69:1180-3. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690051101
  13. O'Brien WJ, Groh CL, Boenke KM. A new, smallcolor- difference equation for dental shade. J Dent Res 1990;69:1762-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690111001
  14. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989;68:819-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680051301
  15. O'.Brien WJ, Groh CL, Boenke KM. One-dimensional color order system for dental shade guides. Dent Mater 1989;5:371-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90102-4
  16. Douglas RD, Przybylska M. Predicting porcelain thickness required for dental shade matches. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:143-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70147-2
  17. Nakamura T, Saito O, Fuyikawa J, Ishigaki S. Influence of abutment substrate and ceramic thickness on the colour of heat-pressed ceramic crowns. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:805-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00919.x
  18. Barghi N, Lorenzana RE. Optimum thickness of opaque and body porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:429-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90080-4