DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

파프리카 재배에서 계절별 광환경 조건과 증산량 예측에 근거한 관수공급 기준 제시

Irrigation Criteria based on Estimated Transpiration and Seasonal Light Environmental Condition for Greenhouse Cultivation of Paprika

  • 신종화 (서울대학교 식물생산과학부 및 농업생명과학연구원) ;
  • 손정익 (서울대학교 식물생산과학부 및 농업생명과학연구원)
  • Shin, Jong Hwa (Department of Plant Science and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Son, Jung Eek (Department of Plant Science and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2015.01.16
  • 심사 : 2015.02.03
  • 발행 : 2015.03.31

초록

파프리카는 수분에 민감한 작물이므로 작물의 생산성 향상을 위하여 적정 관수조절은 매우 중요하다. 광환경 조건은 시설재배에서 여러 환경 변수 중 조절이 용이하지 못하며, 지역 별, 계절 별 분포가 다르기 때문에 광환경 데이터를 이용한 증산과 관수의 추정이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 파프리카의 정확한 증산 예측을 위하여 변형된 증산 추정식을 활용하였다. 또한 기상청의 광도자료를 활용하여 지역 별 증산량과 관수량을 비교하였다. 우리나라의 경우 여름철 하루 중 광도의 편차가 심하고 장마기간이 있으므로 봄, 가을에 비하여 증산량이 오히려 낮았다. 그리고 광주기가 길어지는 봄에 증산량이 가장 많았으므로, 이 시기의 데이터를 이용하여 관수시설 용량을 지역별로 제시할 수 있었다. 이러한 결과는 시설재배에서 관수설비 기준제시를 위한 자료 및 투입에너지 최적화에도 유용하게 활용될 것으로 판단된다.

Irrigation control plays an important role in improving productivity of paprika which is very sensitive to moisture condition. Among environmental factors, light intensity and distribution are not easily controlled and showed a big difference depending on season and region. For adequate irrigation control, therefore, transpiration and irrigation amounts considering light environmental data should be estimated. In current study, modified transpiration model was used for more precise estimation of transpiration. Seasonal transpiration and irrigation amounts at different regions were compared by using light environmental data provided from Korea Meteorological Administration. The transpiration amount in summer was rather smaller than those in spring and autumn seasons in Korea due to large deviations in light intensity as well as rainy period in summer. Irrigation system capacities at various regions could be recommended by using the transpiration amount in the spring having the longest photoperiod in the year. These results will be useful to the design of irrigation system and optimization of input energy in greenhouse.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, T.I. and J.E. Son. 2011. Changes in ion balance and individual ionic contributions to EC reading at different renewal intervals of nutrient solution under EC-based nutrient control in closed-loop soilless culture for sweet peppers (Capsicum annum L. 'Fiesta'). Korean Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology 29:29-35.
  2. Blanke, M.M. 2007. Cosmetic premium fruits despite wet summer climate - horticulture in South Korea. Erwerbs-Obstbau 49:23-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-007-0031-2
  3. Ehret, D.L., J.G. Menzies, and T. Helmer. 2005. Production and quality of greenhouse roses in recirculating nutrient systems. Scientia Horticulturae 106:103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2005.03.002
  4. Hellemans, B. 2006. Environmental control and Paprika growing technique. Substratus Res. Center, Netherlands.
  5. Jolliet, O. 1994. Hortitrans, a model for predicting and optimizing humidity and transpiration in greenhouses. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 57:23-37. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1994.1003
  6. Jolliet, O. and B.J. Bailey. 1992. The effect of climate on tomato transpiration in greenhouses-measurements and models comparison. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 58:43-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(92)90110-P
  7. Kwon, H.H., A.F. Khalil, and T. Siegfried. 2008. Analysis of extreme summer rainfall using climate teleconnections and typhoon characteristics in South Korea. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 44:436-448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00173.x
  8. Medrano, E., P. Lorenzo, M.C. Sanchez-Guerrero, and J.I. Montero. 2005. Evaluation and modelling of greenhouse cucumber-crop transpiration under high and low radiation conditions. Scientia Horticulturae 105:163-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2005.01.024
  9. Qiu, R.J., S.Z. Kang, F.S. Li, T.S. Du, L. Tong, F. Wang, R.Q. Chen, J.Q. Liu, and S.E. Li. 2011. Energy partitioning and evapotranspiration of hot pepper grown in greenhouse with furrow and drip irrigation methods. Scientia Horticulturae 129:790-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.06.012
  10. Raviv, M., A. Krasnovsky, S. Medina, and R. Reuveni. 1998. Assessment of various control strategies for recirculation of greenhouse effluents under semi-arid conditions. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 73:485-491. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.1998.11511003
  11. Shao, G.C., N. Liu, Z.Y. Zhang, S.E. Yu, and C.R. Chen. 2010. Growth, yield and water use efficiency response of greenhouse- grown hot pepper under Time-Space deficit irrigation. Scientia Horticulturae 126:172-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.07.003
  12. Shin, J.H., J.S. Park, and J.E. Son. 2014. Estimating the actual transpiration rate with compensated levels of accumulated radiation for the efficient irrigation of soilless cultures of paprika plants. Agricultural Water Management 135:9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.12.009
  13. Ta, T.H., J.H. Shin, T.I. Ahn, and J.E. Son. 2011. Modeling of transpiration of paprika (Capsicum annuum L.) plants based on radiation and leaf area index in soilless culture. Horticulture Environment and Biotechnology 52:265-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-011-0216-3
  14. Ucar, Y., S. Kazaz, M.A. Askin, K. Aydinsakir, A. Kadayifci, and U. Senyigit. 2011. Determination of irrigation water amount and interval for carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) with Pan Evaporation Method. Hortscience 46:102-107.
  15. Zekki, H., L. Gauthier, and A. Gosselin. 1996. Growth, productivity, and mineral composition of hydroponically cultivated greenhouse tomatoes, with or without nutrient solution recycling. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 121:1082-1088.
  16. Zeng, C.Z., Z.L. Bie, and B.Z. Yuan. 2009. Determination of optimum irrigation water amount for drip-irrigated muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) in plastic greenhouse. Agricultural Water Management 96:595-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.09.019