The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Microscopical and chemical surface characterization of CAD/CAM zircona abutments after different cleaning procedures. A qualitative analysis

  • Received : 2014.09.11
  • Accepted : 2015.02.04
  • Published : 2015.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. To describe and characterize the surface topography and cleanliness of CAD/CAM manufactured zirconia abutments after steaming and ultrasonic cleaning. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 12 ceramic CAD/CAM implant abutments of various manufacturers were produced and randomly divided into two groups of six samples each (control and test group). Four two-piece hybrid abutments and two one-piece abutments made of zirconium-dioxide were assessed per each group. In the control group, cleaning by steam was performed. The test group underwent an ultrasonic cleaning procedure with acetone, ethyl alcohol and antibacterial solution. Groups were subjected to scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis and Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) to verify and characterize contaminant chemical characterization non- quantitatively. RESULTS. All zirconia CAD/CAM abutments in the present study displayed production-induced wear particles, debris as well as organic and inorganic contaminants. The abutments of the test group showed reduction of surface contamination after undergoing an ultrasonic cleaning procedure. However, an absolute removal of pollutants could not be achieved. CONCLUSION. The presence of debris on the transmucosal surface of CAD/CAM zirconia abutments of various manufacturers was confirmed. Within the limits of the study design, the results suggest that a defined ultrasonic cleaning process can be advantageously employed to reduce such debris, thus, supposedly enhancing soft tissue healing. Although the adverse long-term influence of abutment contamination on the biological stability of peri-implant tissues has been evidenced, a standardized and validated polishing and cleaning protocol still has to be implemented.

Keywords

References

  1. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:568-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb00230.x
  2. Lindhe J, Berglundh T. The interface between the mucosa and the implant. Periodontol 2000 1998;17:47-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00122.x
  3. Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:635-41.
  4. Buser D, Weber HP, Donath K, Fiorellini JP, Paquette DW, Williams RC. Soft tissue reactions to non-submerged unloaded titanium implants in beagle dogs. J Periodontol 1992;63:225-35. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.3.225
  5. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Jonsson K, Ericsson I. The topography of the vascular systems in the periodontal and peri-implant tissues in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 1994;21:189-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1994.tb00302.x
  6. Barboza EP, Caúla AL, Carvalho WR. Crestal bone loss around submerged and exposed unloaded dental implants: a radiographic and microbiological descriptive study. Implant Dent 2002;11:162-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200204000-00018
  7. Misch CE, Dietsh-Misch F, Hoar J, Beck G, Hazen R, Misch CM. A bone quality-based implant system: first year of prosthetic loading. J Oral Implantol 1999;25:185-97. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(1999)025<0185:ABQISF>2.3.CO;2
  8. Canullo L, Micarelli C, Lembo-Fazio L, Iannello G, Clementini M. Microscopical and microbiologic characterization of customized titanium abutments after different cleaning procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:328-36.
  9. Canullo L, Micarelli C, Iannello G. Microscopical and chemical surface characterization of the gingival portion and connection of an internal hexagon abutment before and after different technical stages of preparation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:606-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02499.x
  10. Meyle J, Gültig K, Nisch W. Variation in contact guidance by human cells on a microstructured surface. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:81-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820290112
  11. Grossner-Schreiber B, Herzog M, Hedderich J, Duck A, Hannig M, Griepentrog M. Focal adhesion contact formation by fibroblasts cultured on surface-modified dental implants: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:736-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01277.x
  12. Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:68-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01353.x
  13. van Winkelhoff AJ, Goené RJ, Benschop C, Folmer T. Early colonization of dental implants by putative periodontal pathogens in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:511-20. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011006511.x
  14. Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:1-14.
  15. Quirynen M, Bollen CM, Papaioannou W, Van Eldere J, van Steenberghe D. The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:169-78.
  16. Fürst MM, Salvi GE, Lang NP, Persson GR. Bacterial colonization immediately after installation on oral titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:501-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01381.x
  17. Salvi GE, Fürst MM, Lang NP, Persson GR. One-year bacterial colonization patterns of Staphylococcus aureus and other bacteria at implants and adjacent teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:242-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01470.x
  18. Mishra PK, Wu W, Rozo C, Hallab NJ, Benevenia J, Gause WC. Micrometer-sized titanium particles can induce potent Th2-type responses through TLR4-independent pathways. J Immunol 2011;187:6491-8. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1101392
  19. Piattelli A, Pontes AE, Degidi M, Iezzi G. Histologic studies on osseointegration: soft tissues response to implant surfaces and components. A review. Dent Mater 2011;27:53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.019
  20. Bentley EM. The value of ultrasonic cleaners in dental practice. Br Dent J 1994;177:53-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808506
  21. Jatzwauk L, Schöne H, Pietsch H. How to improve instrument disinfection by ultrasound. J Hosp Infect 2001;48:S80-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6701(01)90019-2
  22. Sawase T, Wennerberg A, Hallgren C, Albrektsson T, Baba K. Chemical and topographical surface analysis of five different implant abutments. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:44-50. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011001044.x
  23. Canullo L, Penarrocha D, Micarelli C, Massidda O, Bazzoli M. Hard tissue response to argon plasma cleaning/sterilisation of customised titanium abutments versus 5-second steam cleaning: results of a 2-year post-loading follow-up from an explanatory randomised controlled trial in periodontally healthy patients. Eur J Oral Implantol 2013;6:251-60.
  24. Canullo L, Peñarrocha D, Clementini M, Iannello G, Micarelli C. Impact of plasma of argon cleaning treatment on implant abutments in patients with a history of periodontal disease and thin biotype: radiographic results at 24-month follow-up of a RCT. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:8-14.
  25. Linkevicius T, Apse P. Influence of abutment material on stability of peri-implant tissues: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:449-56.
  26. Nakamura K, Kanno T, Milleding P, Ortengren U. Zirconia as a dental implant abutment material: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:299-309.
  27. Zembic A, Sailer I, Jung RE, Hämmerle CH. Randomizedcontrolled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implants in canine and posterior regions: 3-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:802-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01717.x
  28. Sailer I, Philipp A, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Hämmerle CH, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:4-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01787.x
  29. Garbelotto LG, Maziero Volpato CA, Rocha Md, Maranghello CA, Calasans A, Ozcan M. Laboratory and clinical considerations on prosthetic zirconia infrastructures for implants. Implant Dent 2013;22:578-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000009
  30. Gehrke P, Alius J, Fischer C, Erdelt KJ, Beuer F. Retentive strength of two-piece CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16:920-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12060
  31. Sailer I, Sailer T, Stawarczyk B, Jung RE, Hämmerle CH. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:850-8.
  32. Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Güth JF, Erdelt K, Happe A, Beuer F. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2012;28:1215-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.008
  33. Truninger TC, Stawarczyk B, Leutert CR, Sailer TR, Hämmerle CH, Sailer I. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:12-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02141.x
  34. Bollen CM, Papaioanno W, Van Eldere J, Schepers E, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D. The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:201-11. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070302.x
  35. Butz F, Heydecke G, Okutan M, Strub JR. Survival rate, fracture strength and failure mode of ceramic implant abutments after chewing simulation. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:838-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01515.x
  36. Degidi M, Artese L, Scarano A, Perrotti V, Gehrke P, Piattelli A. Inflammatory infiltrate, microvessel density, nitric oxide synthase expression, vascular endothelial growth factor expression, and proliferative activity in peri-implant soft tissues around titanium and zirconium oxide healing caps. J Periodontol 2006;77:73-80. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.77.1.73
  37. Glauser R, Sailer I, Wohlwend A, Studer S, Schibli M, Scharer P. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:285-90.
  38. Canullo L, Micarelli C, Lembo-Fazio L, Iannello G, Clementini M. Microscopical and microbiologic characterization of customized titanium abutments after different cleaning procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:328-36.
  39. Micarelli C, Canullo L, Baldissara P, Clementini M. Implant abutment screw reverse torque values before and after plasma cleaning. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:331-3. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3396
  40. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1--review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:536-43.

Cited by

  1. Influence of plasma cleaning procedure on the interaction between soft tissue and abutments: a randomized controlled histologic study vol.28, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12953
  2. Effect of Clinically Relevant CAD/CAM Zirconia Polishing on Gingival Fibroblast Proliferation and Focal Adhesions vol.10, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10121358
  3. Influence of scaling procedures on the integrity of titanium nitride coated CAD/CAM abutments vol.10, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.3.197
  4. 임플란트 지대주와 임플란트 주위 연조직의 반응에 관한 고찰 vol.32, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2016.32.4.263
  5. Effects of cleaning methods for custom abutment surfaces on gene expression of human gingival fibroblasts vol.59, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.16-0681
  6. Considerations for Fabrication of CAD-CAM Abutments: Part I. Selection of Titanium Block and Fabrication Process vol.23, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.2019005
  7. Characteristics of Local Delivery Agents for Treating Peri-Implantitis on Dental Implant Surfaces: A Preclinical Study vol.45, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-17-00261
  8. Biofunctionalization of zirconia with cell-adhesion peptides via polydopamine crosslinking for soft tissue engineering: effects on the biological behaviors of human gingival fibroblasts and oral bacte vol.10, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra08575k
  9. Decontamination of Titanium Surface Using Different Methods: An In Vitro Study vol.13, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13102287
  10. The Effect of Different Cleaning Protocols of Polymer-Based Prosthetic Materials on the Behavior of Human Gingival Fibroblasts vol.17, pp.21, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217753
  11. Factors Influencing Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants: A Narrative Review vol.11, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11070865