The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Efficacy of various cleaning solutions on saliva-contaminated zirconia for improved resin bonding

  • Kim, Da-Hye (Department of Medical & Biological Engineering, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Son, Jun-Sik (Korea Textile Development Institute) ;
  • Jeong, Seong-Hwa (Faculty of Health Science, Daegu Haany University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Kyung (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Kyo-Han (Department of Dental Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kwon, Tae-Yub (Department of Dental Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2014.11.26
  • Accepted : 2015.03.16
  • Published : 2015.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of cleaning solutions on saliva-contaminated zirconia in comparison to air-abrasion in terms of resin bonding. MATERIALS AND METHODS. For saliva-contaminated air-abraded zirconia, seven cleaning methods)-no contamination (NC), water-spray rinsing (WS), additional air-abrasion (AA), and cleaning with four solutions (Ivoclean [IC]; 1.0 wt% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 1.0 wt% hydrogen peroxide [HP], and 1.0 wt% sodium hypochlorite [SHC])-were tested. The zirconia surfaces for each group were characterized using various analytical techniques. Three bonded resin (Panavia F 2.0) cylinders (bonding area: $4.5mm^2$) were made on one zirconia disk specimen using the Ultradent jig method [four disks (12 cylinders)/group; a total of 28 disks]. After 5,000 thermocycling, all specimens were subjected to a shear bond strength test with a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/minute. The fractured surfaces were observed using an optical and scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS. Contact angle measurements showed that groups NC, AA, IC, and SHC had hydrophilic surfaces. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis showed similar elemental distributions between group AA and groups IC and SHC. Groups IC and SHC showed statistically similar bond strengths to groups NC and AA (P>.05), but not groups SDS and HP (P<.05). For groups WS, SDS, and HP, blister-like bubble formations were observed on the surfaces under SEM. CONCLUSION. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, some of the cleaning solutions (IC or SHC) were effective in removing saliva contamination and enhancing the resin bond strength.

Keywords

References

  1. Yang B, Scharnberg M, Wolfart S, Quaas AC, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M. Influence of contamination on bonding to zirconia ceramic. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007;81:283-90.
  2. Kim MJ, Kim YK, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Shear bond strengths of various luting cements to zirconia ceramic: surface chemical aspects. J Dent 2011;39:795-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.08.012
  3. Wegner SM, Kern M. Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:139-47.
  4. Quaas AC, Yang B, Kern M. Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures. Dent Mater 2007;23:506-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.008
  5. Yang B, Lange-Jansen HC, Scharnberg M, Wolfart S, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M. Influence of saliva contamination on zirconia ceramic bonding. Dent Mater 2008;24:508-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.013
  6. Yang B, Wolfart S, Scharnberg M, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M. Influence of contamination on zirconia ceramic bonding. J Dent Res 2007;86:749-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910708600812
  7. Phark JH, Duarte S Jr, Kahn H, Blatz MB, Sadan A. Influence of contamination and cleaning on bond strength to modified zirconia. Dent Mater 2009;25:1541-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.07.007
  8. Boulange-Petermann L, Joud JC, Baroux B. Wettability parameters controlling the surface cleanability of stainless steel. In: Mittal KL, ed. Contact angle, wettability and adhesion. Leiden; VSP; 2008. p. 139-51.
  9. Kim YK, Son JS, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Influence of surface energy parameters of dental self-adhesive resin cements on bond strength to dentin. J Adhesion Sci Technol 2013;27:1778-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2012.761057
  10. Kim YK, Min BK, Son JS, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Influence of different drying methods on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 2014;72:954-62. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.926024
  11. Takimoto M, Ishii R, Iino M, Shimizu Y, Tsujimoto A, Takamizawa T, Ando S, Miyazaki M. Influence of temporary cement contamination on the surface free energy and dentine bond strength of self-adhesive cements. J Dent 2012;40:131-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.11.012
  12. Chibowski E, Holysz L, Terpilowski K, Jurak M. Investigation of super-hydrophobic effect of PMMA layers with different fillers deposited on glass support. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Asp 2006;291:181-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.09.022
  13. Holysz L, Miroslaw M, Terpilowski K, Szczes A. Influence of relative humidity on the wettability of silicon wafer surfaces. Ann UMCS Chem 2008;63:223-39.
  14. Phark JH1, Duarte S Jr, Blatz M, Sadan A. An in vitro evaluation of the long-term resin bond to a new densely sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic surface. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60286-3
  15. Hagge MS, Lindemuth JS. Shear bond strength of an autopolymerizing core buildup composite bonded to dentin with 9 dentin adhesive systems. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:620-3. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.119683
  16. Yun JY, Ha SR, Lee JB, Kim SH. Effect of sandblasting and various metal primers on the shear bond strength of resin cement to Y-TZP ceramic. Dent Mater 2010;26:650-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.03.008
  17. Sattabanasuk V, Vachiramon V, Qian F, Armstrong SR. Resin-dentin bond strength as related to different surface preparation methods. J Dent 2007;35:467-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.01.002
  18. McClean MD, Rinehart RD, Ngo L, Eisen EA, Kelsey KT, Wiencke JK, Herrick RF. Urinary 1-hydroxypyrene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure among asphalt paving workers. Ann Occup Hyg 2004;48:565-78. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/meh044
  19. Neppelberg E, Costea DE, Vintermyr OK, Johannessen AC. Dual effects of sodium lauryl sulphate on human oral epithelial structure. Exp Dermatol 2007;16:574-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0625.2007.00567.x
  20. Walsh LJ. Safety issues relating to the use of hydrogen peroxide in dentistry. Aust Dent J 2000;45:257-69; quiz 289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2000.tb00261.x
  21. Baumgartner JC, Cuenin PR. Efficacy of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite for root canal irrigation. J Endod 1992;18:605-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81331-2
  22. Chen L, Suh BI, Brown D, Chen X. Bonding of primed zirconia ceramics: evidence of chemical bonding and improved bond strengths. Am J Dent 2012;25:103-8.
  23. Piascik JR, Swift EJ, Braswell K, Stoner BR. Surface fluorination of zirconia: adhesive bond strength comparison to commercial primers. Dent Mater 2012;28:604-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.01.008
  24. Matinlinna JP, Heikkinen T, Ozcan M, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Evaluation of resin adhesion to zirconia ceramic using some organosilanes. Dent Mater 2006;22:824-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.035
  25. Ratner BD. Characterization of biomaterial surfaces. Cardiovasc Pathol 1993;2:87-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/1054-8807(93)90049-8
  26. Spencer HR, Ike V, Brennan PA. Review: the use of sodium hypochlorite in endodontics-potential complications and their management. Br Dent J 2007;202:555-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2007.374
  27. Del Carpio-Perochena AE, Bramante CM, Duarte MA, Cavenago BC, Villas-Boas MH, Graeff MS, Bernardineli N, de Andrade FB, Ordinola-Zapata R. Biofilm dissolution and cleaning ability of different irrigant solutions on intraorally infected dentin. J Endod 2011;37:1134-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.04.013
  28. Liu G, Craig VS. Improved cleaning of hydrophilic proteincoated surfaces using the combination of Nanobubbles and SDS. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2009;1:481-7. https://doi.org/10.1021/am800150p
  29. Arkles B, Pan Y, Kim YM. The role of polarity in the structure of silanes employed in surface modification. In: Mittal KL, editor. Silanes and other coupling agents. Leiden; CRC Press; 2009. p. 51-64.
  30. Vanderlei A, Passos SP, Ozcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Durability of adhesion between feldspathic ceramic and resin cements: effect of adhesive resin, polymerization mode of resin cement, and aging. J Prosthodont 2013;22:196-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00934.x
  31. Roulet JF. Statistics: nuisance - tool - necessity? J Adhes Dent 2013;15:203.
  32. De Lucas M, Janss GFE, Whitfield DP, Ferrer M. Collision fatality of raptors in wind farms does not depend on raptor abundance. J Appl Ecol 2008;45:1695-703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01549.x

Cited by

  1. Cleaning Methods for Zirconia Following Salivary Contamination vol.25, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12441
  2. Efficacy of novel cleansing agent for the decontamination of lithium disilicate ceramics: a shear bond strength study vol.31, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1206335
  3. Effect of Decontamination and Cleaning on the Shear Bond Strength of High Translucency Zirconia vol.5, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj5040032
  4. The effect of different cleaning agents on saliva contamination for bonding performance of zirconia ceramics vol.37, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-376
  5. Comparison of Bonding Strength by Cleaning Method of Pediatric Zirconia Crown Contaminated with Saliva or Blood vol.45, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2018.45.2.185
  6. Effect of cleaning methods on retentive values of saliva-contaminated implant-supported zirconia copings vol.29, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13150
  7. Influence of cleaning methods on resin bonding to saliva-contaminated zirconia vol.30, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12369
  8. Influência do método de limpeza da zircônia na adesão da prótese após a contaminação com saliva vol.48, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.06819
  9. Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Current Conditioning Methods and Bonding Materials vol.7, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7030074
  10. Clinical Assessment of Inlay-retained Bridge Designs (Tub-shaped and Inlay-shaped) in Missing Posterior Teeth Cases: A Randomized Controlled Trial vol.11, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1713
  11. Influence of different cleaning procedures on the shear bond strength of 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate-containing self-adhesive resin cement to saliva contaminated zirconia vol.65, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_20_00157
  12. Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements vol.14, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14112751
  13. Retention Forces of Monolithic CAD/CAM Crowns Adhesively Cemented to Titanium Base Abutments-Effect of Saliva Contamination Followed by Cleaning of the Titanium Bond Surface vol.14, pp.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123375
  14. Microshear bond strength of dual-cure resin cement in zirconia after different cleaning techniques: an in vitro study vol.13, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.4.237
  15. Predictable bonding of adhesive indirect restorations: factors for success vol.231, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-3336-x
  16. Effect of different cleaning methods on resin bond strength of contaminated monolithic zirconia vol.35, pp.23, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1892428