산업경영시스템학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering)

  • 제38권1호
  • /
  • Pages.83-89
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2005-0461(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7975(eISSN)
한국산업경영시스템학회 (Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

몬테카를로 DEA를 이용한 불확실성을 고려한 효율적 공급자 선정

Efficient Supplier Selection with Uncertainty Using Monte Carlo DEA

  • 하정훈 (홍익대학교 정보컴퓨터공학부)
  • Ha, Chunghun (School of Information and Computer Engineering, Hongik University)
  • 투고 : 2015.01.05
  • 심사 : 2015.02.04
  • 발행 : 2015.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Selection of efficient supplier is a very important process as risk or uncertainty of a supply chain and its environment are increasing. Previous deterministic DEA and probabilistic DEAs are very limited to handle various types of risk and uncertainty. In this paper, I propose an improved probabilistic DEA which consists of two steps; Monte Carlo simulation and statistical decision making. The simulation results show that the proposed method is proper to distinguish supplier's performance and provide statistical decision background.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bogetoft, P. and Otto, L., Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R, Vol. 157, Springer, 2010.
  2. Braglia, M. and Petroni, A., A quality assurance-oriented methodology for handling trade-offs in supplier selection. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag., 2000, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 96-112. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030010318829
  3. Carr, A.S. and Pearson, J.N., Strategically managed buyer-supplier relationships and performance outcomes. J. Oper. Manag., 1999, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 497-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00007-8
  4. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1978, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  5. Choi, T.Y. and Hartley, J.L., An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain. J. Oper. Manag., 1996, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 333-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00091-5
  6. Cooper, W.W., Huang, Z., and Li, S.X., Satisficing DEA models under chance constraints. Ann. Oper. Res., 1996, Vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187302
  7. Ho, W., Xu, X., and Dey, P.K., Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection : A literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2010, Vol. 202, No. 1, pp. 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009
  8. Park, S.H., Design of Experiments, 2nd ed., Vol. 1, Seoul : Minyoungsa, 2003.
  9. Talluri, S. and Narasimhan, R., Vendor evaluation with performance variability : a max-min approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2003, Vol. 146, No. 3, pp. 543-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00230-8
  10. Talluri, S., Narasimhan, R., and Nair, A., Vendor performance with supply risk : A chance-constrained DEA approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 2006, Vol. 100, No. 2, pp. 212-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.012
  11. Tang, C.S., Perspectives in supply chain risk management. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 2006, Vol. 103, No. 2, pp. 451-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.12.006
  12. Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., and Benton, W.C., Vendor selection criteria and methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1991, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(91)90033-R
  13. Wu, T. and Blackhurst, J., Supplier evaluation and selection : an augmented DEA approach. Int. J. Prod. Res., 2009, Vol. 47, No. 16, pp. 4593-4608. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540802054227
  14. Wu, D. and Olson, D.L., Supply chain risk, simulation, and vendor selection. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 2008, Vol. 114, No. 2, pp. 646-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.02.013

피인용 문헌

  1. DEA AHP 모형을 통한 철강유통산업에서의 공급업체 선정 vol.40, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2017.40.2.051
  2. 공급 리스크를 고려한 공급자 선정의 다단계 의사결정 모형 vol.40, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2017.40.4.112