DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Field Performance Evaluation of Candidate Samplers for National Reference Method for PM2.5

PM2.5 국가기준측정장비 선정을 위한 비교 측정 연구

  • Lee, Yong Hwan (Department of Air Quality Research, Climate and Air Quality Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Park, Jin Su (Department of Air Quality Research, Climate and Air Quality Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Oh, Jun (Department of Air Quality Research, Climate and Air Quality Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Choi, Jin Soo (Department of Air Quality Research, Climate and Air Quality Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Kim, Hyun Jae (Department of Air Quality Research, Climate and Air Quality Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Ahn, Joon Young (Department of Air Quality Research, Climate and Air Quality Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Hong, You Deog (Department of Air Quality Research, Climate and Air Quality Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Hong, Ji Hyung (Department of Air Quality Research, Climate and Air Quality Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Han, Jin Seok (Department of Air Quality Research, Climate and Air Quality Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Lee, Gangwoong (Department of Environmental Science, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
  • 이용환 (국립환경과학원 기후대기연구부 대기환경연구과) ;
  • 박진수 (국립환경과학원 기후대기연구부 대기환경연구과) ;
  • 오준 (국립환경과학원 기후대기연구부 대기환경연구과) ;
  • 최진수 (국립환경과학원 기후대기연구부 대기환경연구과) ;
  • 김현재 (국립환경과학원 기후대기연구부 대기환경연구과) ;
  • 안준영 (국립환경과학원 기후대기연구부 대기환경연구과) ;
  • 홍유덕 (국립환경과학원 기후대기연구부 대기환경연구과) ;
  • 홍지형 (국립환경과학원 기후대기연구부 대기환경연구과) ;
  • 한진석 (국립환경과학원 기후대기연구부 대기환경연구과) ;
  • 이강웅 (한국외국어대학교 환경학과 대기화학연구실)
  • Received : 2015.02.26
  • Accepted : 2015.04.13
  • Published : 2015.04.30

Abstract

To establish National Reference Method (NRM) for $PM_{2.5}$, operational performance of 5 different commercial gravimetric-based $PM_{2.5}$ measuring instruments was assessed at Bulkwang monitoring station from January 23, 2014 to February 28, 2014. First, physical properties, design, and functional performance of the instruments were assessed. Evaluation was carried out to determine whether operating method for the instruments and levels of QA/QC activities meet the data quality objectives (DQOs). To verify whether DQOs were satisfied, reproducibility of QA/QC procedures, accuracy, relative sensitivity, limit of detection, margin of error, and coefficient of determination of the instruments were also evaluated. Results of flow rate measurement of 15 candidate instruments indicated that all the instruments met performance criteria with accuracy deviation of 4.0% and reproducibility of 0.6%. Comparison of final $PM_{2.5}$ mass concentrations showed that the coefficient of determination ($R^2$) values were greater than or equal to 0.9995, and concentration gradient ranged from 0.97 to 1.03. All the instruments satisfied criteria for NRM with the estimated precision of 1.47~2.60%, accuracy of -1.90~3.00%, and absolute accuracy of 1.02~3.12%. This study found that one particular type of measuring instrument was proved to be excellent, with overall evaluation criteria satisfied.

Keywords

References

  1. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (2000) Canada Wide Standards for Particulate Matter (PM) and Ozone.
  2. Dabek-Zlotorzynska, E., T.F. Dann, P. Kalyani Martinelango, V. Celo, J.R. Brook, D. Mathieu, L. Ding, and C.C. Austin (2011) Canadian National Air Pollution Surveillance (NAPS) $PM_{2.5}$ speciation program: Methodology and $PM_{2.5}$ chemical composition for the tears 2003-2008, Atmos. Environ., 45, 673-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.10.024
  3. European Union (2008) Directive 2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe, Official Journal of the European Union L, 152, 1-44.
  4. National Institute of Environmental Research (2014a) Study on the chemical characteristics of $PM_{2.5}$ in case of high concentration episode ( I ), 11-1480523-002149-01.
  5. National Institute of Environmental Research (2014b) Emission Sources and Behavior of $PM_{2.5}$ Organic Materials (V), 11-1480523-002121-01.
  6. North American Research Strategy for Tropospheric Ozone (2003) Assessment of tropospheric particulate matter in North America, NARSTO, Kennewick, WA.
  7. Seinfeld and Pandis (1998) Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. From air pollution to climate change. New Jersey: John Wiley&Sons Inc.
  8. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1997) In: Register, F. (Ed.), National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for particulate Matter, 62, 38652-38752.

Cited by

  1. Comparison of PM2.5 Concentrations by Measurement Method vol.33, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2017.33.5.515
  2. Comparison of the Real-time Measurements for PM2.5 and Quality Control Method vol.33, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2017.33.6.616