DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Outage Performance for DF Two-Way Relaying with Co-Channel Interference over Nakagami-m Fading

  • Fan, Jinhong (School of Information and Communication Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications) ;
  • Yuan, Chaowei (School of Information and Communication Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications)
  • Received : 2015.06.04
  • Accepted : 2015.09.04
  • Published : 2015.11.30

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the outage performance of a two-way decode-and-forward relaying network in an interference-limited Nakagami-m fading environment. More specifically, assuming the presence of Nakagami-m faded multiple co-channel interferers at the source/destination terminals, the closed-form approximate expression for the outage probability is derived by using moment-based estimators attaining the appropriate Nakagami-m fading parameter. Simulation results demonstrate that our analytical result is in excellent agreement with the Monte Carlo simulation.

Keywords

1. Introduction

Relaying technologies can improve throughout and increase communication range. They have emerged as an effective means for exploiting spatial diversity [1,2]. Channel capacity is increased [3] and full diversity gain can be achieved [4] by sharing antennas amongst users via relaying. The capacity of relay channels was first studied in [5] where Cover et al. considered the classical three-node relay network and derived the channel capacity. Two protocols for one-way relay networks, known as decode-and-forward (DF) and amplify-and-forward (AF) relaying, were proposed in [6]. Due to the capacity loss of the pre-log factor of 1/2 [7] in half-duplex relaying, two-way relaying has been introduced, e.g., [8-10]. Until now, the performance analysis and different transmission schemes for AF and DF two-way relaying network have been well investigated in the literature. When a network coding approach [11] is applied to relay networks, two-way DF [8] and AF [9] relaying schemes were proposed. It has been illustrated in [10] that both DF and AF two-way relaying protocols can fully recover the spectral efficiency loss. For this reason, two-way relaying networks have attracted much attention in wireless communications. The rate performance of two-way relaying network has been extensively studied in recent years. The achievable rate regions for half-duplex two-way relaying network were studied in [12,13]. In [14], the exact outage probabilities for a three-node two-way relaying network using AF and DF schemes were presented and an adaptive AF/DF scheme was proposed to achieve the optimal outage performance. The two-way relaying technology was combined with small cell [15,16,17] technology and Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) [18] technology.

The co-channel interference is inevitable in wireless communications. The performance analysis of one-way relaying network has turned the focus to interference-limited channels [19-21]. One-way relaying system with noisy relay and interference-limited destination was examined and the closed-form outage probabilities were derived for both DF and AF protocols [19]. One-way relaying system with multiple interferers over Rayleigh fading channels was studied in [20]. The exact outage probability of the DF one-way relaying system with unequal-power interferers using opportunistic relay selection was provided in [21]. A DF one-way relaying network using opportunistic relaying selection was investigated in [22], where the outage-optimal relay selection was proposed and the closed-form outage probabilities were derived in a multi-cell environment. A DF two-way relaying network with co-channel interferences was investigated in [23], where a tight approximate expression of the average symbol error rate was derived in closed-form. In [24], the exact symbol error probability of two-way DF relaying network in the presence of a finite number of co-channel interferes and noise at the relay and the source codes in Rayleigh fading environment was studied. The interference limits were considered in cognitive femtocells system [25].

On the other hand, the performance of the relaying network based on the Nakagami-m fading channels has been investigated recently. In[26-28], the performance of two-way interference-limited AF relaying systems with over Nakagami-m fading channels was investiaged. In [29], the outage performance of dual-hop DF cooperative systems in the interference-limited Nakagami-m fading environment was investigated. The symbol error probability of a two-way relay-based communication system with opportunistic relay selection in Nakagami-m fading environments was studied in [30]. In this letter, we consider an interference-limited Nakagami-m fading environment in the investigation of the outage performance of a DF two-way relaying network with multiple interferers.

The rest of this paper is organized as follows. The system model is described in Section 2. In Section 3, we investigate the outage probability of the DF two-way relaying system with multiple interferers in Nakagami-m fading environment. In Section 4, some numerical results are given to verify our analysis. Finally, Section 5 concludes the paper.

Notations-we denote P{B} as the probability of a random event B, while E{B} returns the expected value of the input random variable or event. FB(x) and fB(x) are, respectively, the cumulative density function and the probability density function of B. represents the binomial coefficient, whereas are the upper Gamma and the Euler Gamma functions, respectively.

 

2. System Model

The two-way relaying system model with co-channel interference is shown in Fig. 1, where two mobile terminals, S1 and S2, at the edges of two different cells exchange message with the aid of a relay node R, assuming that the direct path between them is broken. The source nodes, S1 and S2, are at the cell-edges and suffer from interference from other mobile/relay nodes in adjacent cells, while the relay node R is free from interference. We assume that interference is the dominating factor limiting the performance. The noises at S1 and S2 are ignored, whilst R is noise-limited. The forward and backward channels are reciprocal, with α1 denoting the channel between S1 and R, and α2 denoting the channel between S2 and R. We assume that S1, S2 and R are all equipped with one antenna only. The DF protocol is used at the relay. The DF two-way relaying strategy consists of two equal time slots.

Fig. 1.The two-way relaying system model with co-channel interference

In the first time slot, S1 and S2 send their messages, x1 and x2, to R, and R has the following received signal:

where nR is the complex Gaussian noise with zero mean and variance of . It is assumed that α1 and α2 are independent Nakagami-m fading channels, respectively having fading parameter m1 and m2 and satisfying Ω1 = E{|α1|2} and Ω2 = E{|α2|2}. We also denote the transmit power at S1 and S2 by P1 = E{|x1|2} and P2 = E{|x2|2}, respectively.

In the second time slot, both x1 and x2 are decoded successfully. The relay R combines the decoded symbols using physical layer network coding, obtains xR and broadcasts it to S1 and S2 [31]. Therefore, after two time slots, S1 obtains

where the contribution from N1 interference signals is considered. The channels between the interferers and S1 are {gi}. They are assumed to be independent Nakagami-m fading satisfying E{|gi|2}= ΩiI and have fading parameter miI, for i =1,2,...,N1. The received signal by S2 is

where are the interference signals. The channels between the interferers and S2 are {hj}. They are independent Nakagami-m fading with E{|hj|2}= ΩjI and have fading parameter mjI, for 2 j =1,2,...,N2. Furthermore, we assume that the influence of the interference at S1 and S2 are dominant and therefore the effect of n1 and n2 are neglected. The transmit power of R is given by PR = E{|xR|2}. The interference power at S1 and S2 are .

We define the following signal-to-noise ratios (SNR):

We also define the signal-to-interference ratios:

where .

 

3. Outage Probability Analysis

In this section, we investigate the outage probability for the two-way relaying network. Firstly we denote the transmission rates from S1 to S2 and from S2 to S1 by R1 and R2, respectively. According to the rate region for the two-way relaying network in [32], an outage event exactly occurred when

Our main result is given in the following conclusion.

Conclusion: Assuming that . If the interferers have similar power at S1 and S2, i.e., the outage probability Pout is given by

In (10), the parameters are

Proof: See Appendix.

 

4. Numerical Results

Here, we present the numerical result to validate the analytical result of the outage probability. Fig. 2 portrays the outage probability of DF two-way relaying network for different R2 and by setting P1=P2, m1 = 2 , Ω1 =1.5 , m2 = 2 , and Ω2 = 2 . In the simulation, we set the transmission rates by R1=0.7, , PR=30dB, N1=N2=2. It is clearly observed that the approximate result (10) matches the Monte Carlo result perfectly.

Fig. 2.Outage probability of DF two-way relaying system for different R2

 

5. Conclusion

Assuming a two-way DF relaying system with Nakagami-m fading multiple co-channel interferers at the source/terminal nodes and a noisy relay, an approximate expression for the outage probability was derived. In all the comparisons, an excellent match between the approximate and simulation result has been observed.

References

  1. V.Tarokh, N.Seshadri, and A.R.Calderbank, “Space-time codes for high data rate wireless communication: performance criterion and code construction,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol.44, no.2, pp.744-765, March, 1998. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1109/18.661517
  2. S.M.Alamouti, “A simple transmit diversity technique for wireless communications,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol.16, no.8, pp.1451-1458, October, 1998. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1109/49.730453
  3. A.Sendonaris, E.Erkip, and B.Aazhang, “User cooperation diversity-part II: implementation aspects and performance analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Communication, vol.51, no.11, pp.1939-1948, November, 2003. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2003.819238
  4. J.N.Laneman and G.W.Wornell, “Distributed space-time coded protocols for exploiting cooperative diversity in wireless networks,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol.49, no.10, pp.2415-2525, October, 2003. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2003.817829
  5. T.Cover and A.Gamal, “Capacity theorems for the relay channel,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol.25, no.5, pp.572-584, September, 1979. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1979.1056084
  6. J.N.Laneman and G.W.Wornell, "Exploiting distributed spatial diversity in wireless networks," in Proc. of 2000 Allerton Conference on Communication, Control and computing, pp.1-10, October, 2000. Article (CrossRef Link)
  7. J.N.Laneman, D.N.Tse, and G.W.Wornell, “Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: efficient protocols and outage behavior,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol.50, no.12, pp.3062-3080, December, 2004. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2004.838089
  8. Y. Wu, P. A. Chou, and S.-Y. Kung, "Information exchange in wireless networks with network coding and physical-layer broadcast," in Proc. of 2005 Conference on Information Science and Systems, pp.1-7, March 16-18, 2005. Article (CrossRef Link)
  9. P. Popovski and H.Yomo, "Bi-directional amplification of throughout in a wireless multi-hop network," in Proc. of IEEE 63th Vehicular Technology, pp.7-10, May 7-10, 2006. Article (CrossRef Link)
  10. B. Rankov and A. Wittneben, “Spectral efficient protocols for half-duplex fading relay channels,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol.25, no.2, pp.379-389, February, 2007. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2007.070213
  11. R.Ahlswede, N.Cai, S.-Y.R.Li, and R.W.Yeung, “Network information flow,” IEEE Transactions on Information Technology, vol.46, no.4, pp.1204-1216, July, 2000. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1109/18.850663
  12. S.Kim, P.Mitran, and V.Tarokh, “Performance bounds for bi-directional relaying,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol.54, no.11, pp.5235-5241, November, 2008. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2008.929913
  13. Y.Han, S.H.Ting, C.K.Ho, and W.H.Chin, “Performance bounds for two-way amplify-and-forward relaying,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communication, vol.8, no.1, pp.432-438, January, 2009. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1109/T-WC.2009.080316
  14. Q.Li, S.Ting, A.Pandharipande, and Y.Han, “Adaptive two-way relaying and outage analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communication, vol.8, no.6, pp.3288-3299, June, 2009. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2009.081213
  15. Haijun Zhang, Xiaoli Chu, Weisi Guo, and Siyi Wang, “Coexistence of Wi-Fi and heterogeneous small cell networks sharing unlicensed spectrum,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol.53, no.3, pp.158-164, March, 2015. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2015.7060498
  16. Haijun Zhang, Chunxiao Jiang, Xiaoli Chu, and Xianbin Wang, “Resource allocation for cognitive small cell networks: a cooperative bargaining game theoretic approach,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol.14, no.6, pp3481-3493, June, 2015. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2015.2407355
  17. Mingjie Feng, Tao Jiang, Da Chen and Shiwen Mao, “Cooperative small cell networks: high capacity for hotspots with interference mitigation,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 21, no. 6, pp.108-116, December, 2014. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2014.7000978
  18. Xiangming Li, Tao Jiang and Jianping An, “Cooperative Communications Based on Rateless Network Coding in Distributed MIMO Systems,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol.17, no.3, pp.60-67, June, 2010. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2010.5490980
  19. C. Zhong, S. Jin, and K. K. Wong, “Dual-hop system with noisy relay and interference-limited destination,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol.58, no.3, pp.764-768, March, 2010. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2010.03.080156
  20. D. Lee and J. H. Lee, “Outage probability for dual-hop relaying systems with multiple interferers over Rayleigh fading channels,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol.60, no.1, pp.333-338, October, 2011. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2010.2089998
  21. J. B. Kim and D. Kim, “Exact and closed-form outage probability of opportunistic decode-and-forward relaying with unequal-power interferers,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol.9, no.12, pp.3601-3606, October, 2010. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2010.101310.091865
  22. D. Lee and J. H. Lee, "Outage probability for opportunistic relaying on multi-cell environments," in Proc. of IEEE 69th Vehicular Technology Conference, pp.1-5, April 26-29, 2009. Article (CrossRef Link)
  23. Youyun Xu, Xiaochen Xia and Kui Xu, "Symbol error rate of two-way decode and forward relaying with co-channel interference," in Proc. of 2013 IEEE 24th International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, pp.138-143, September 8-11, 2013. Article (CrossRef Link)
  24. Sajad Hatamnia, Saeed Vahidian, and Mahmoud Ahmadian-Attari, “Performance analysis of two-way decode and forward relaying in the presence of co-channel interferences,” IET Communications, vol.8, no.18, pp.3349-3356, December, 2014. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2014.0592
  25. Haijun Zhang, Chunxiao Jiang, Xiaotao Mao, and Hsiao-Hwa Chen, “Interference-limited resource optimization in cognitive femtocells with fairness and imperfect spectrum sensing,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, doi:10.1109/TVT.2015.2405538, 2015. Article (CrossRef Link)
  26. E. Soleimani-Nasab, M. Matthaiou, M. Ardebilipour and G. K. Karragianadis, “Two-way AF relaying in the presecne of co-channel interference,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 61, no. 8, pp.3156-3169, August. 2013. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2013.053013.120840
  27. E. Soleimani-Nasab, M. Matthaiou, G. K. Karagiannidis and M. Ardebilipour, "Two-way interference-limited AF relaying over Nakagami-m fading channels," in Proc. of 2013 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp.4275-4281, December 9-13, 2013. Article (CrossRef Link)
  28. E. Soleimani-Nasab, M. Matthaiou and G. K. Karagiannidis, "Two-way interference-limited AF relaying with selection-combining," in Proc. of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp.4992-4996, May 26-31, 2013. Article (CrossRef Link)
  29. Daniel Benevides da Costa, Haiyang Ding, and Jianhua Ge, "Interference-limited relaying transmissions in dual-hop cooperative networks over Nakagami-m fading," IEEE Communications Letters, pp.503-505, March, 2011. Article (CrossRef Link)
  30. Kais Ben Fredj, Salama S Ikki, and Sonia Aissa, “Performance analysis of two-way opportunistic decode and forward based systems in Nakagami-m fading environments,” IET Communications, vol.8, no.9, pp.1626-1636, June, 2014. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2013.0596
  31. P.Popovski and H.Yomo, "Physical network coding in two-way wireless relay channels," in Proc. of 2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp.707-712, June 24-28, 2007. Article (CrossRef Link)
  32. W. Nam, S.-Y. Chung, and Y. H. Lee, "Capacity bounds for two-way relay channels," in Proc. of 2008 IEEE International Zurich Seminar on Communications, pp.144-147, March 12-14, 2008. Article (CrossRef Link)
  33. Y.-D. YAO and A. Sheikh, “Outage probability analysis for microcell mobile radio systems with cochannel interferers in Ricaian/Rayleigh fading environment,” IEE Electronics Letters, vol.26, no.13, pp.864-866, June, 1990. Article (CrossRef Link) https://doi.org/10.1049/el:19900566
  34. M.Nakagami, "The m-distribution-a general formula of intensity distribution of rapid fading," in proc. of Statistical Methods in Radio Wave Propagation symposium, pp.3-6, June 18-20, 1960. Article (CrossRef Link)