참고문헌
- 손원옥(2003). CBL 수업이 중학생들의 그래프 능력에 미치는 영향. 한국교원대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.
- 송정화, 권오남(2002). 6차와 7차 교과서 분석을 통한 그래프 지도 방안. 학교수학, 4(2), 161-192.
- 송정화, 이종희(2007). 그래프에서 교사와 학생의 의미 구성에 관한 사례연구. 학교수학, 9(3), 375-396.
- 우정호(2001). 학교수학의 교육적 기초. 서울: 서울대학교 출판부.
- 유현주(2013). 2007 개정 초등수학교육과정에 따른 통계영역 교과서 분석: 그래프 지도를 중심으로. 초등연구교육, 24(1), 81-97.
- 정영옥(1997). Freudenthal의 수학화 학습-지도론 연구. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.
- 조아영, 이광호, 최성택(2014). 초등학교 6학년 학생들의 그래프 해석 및 지도 방안. 초등수학교육, 7(2), 113-125.
- 이헌수, 박종률, 이광호(2009). 그래핑 계산기와 CBL을 활용한 1차 함수 탐구: 초등 영재아를 중심으로 한 사례연구. 학교수학, 12(3), 347-364.
- Ellen, C. J. (1998). Discovering mathematics with the TI-73: Activities for grades 7 and 8. Texas Instruments.
- Fiona, T. (2003). The calculator based ranger and students'understanding of motion graphs and functions. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Florida.
- Goldberg, F. M., & Anderson, J. H. (1989). Student difficulties with graphical representations of negative values of velocity. The Physics Teacher, 27, 254-260. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2342748
- Hogan, K. D. (2001). Learning in motion. Focus, 8(4), 40-42.
- Krabbendam, H. (1982). The non-quantitative way of describing of relations and the role of graphs: Some experiments. In G. Van Barneveld, & H. Krabbendam (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference on functions (pp. 125-146). The Netherlands: National Institute for Curriculum.
- Kwon, O. N. (2002). The effect of calculator-based ranger activities on students'graphing ability. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1949-8 594.2002.tb17895.x/abstract
- Lapp, D. A., & Cyrus, V. F. (2000). Using data collection devices to enhance student understanding. Mathematics Teacher, 93(6), 504-510.
- Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarsky, B. (1997). From verbal descriptions to graphic representations: Stability and change in students conceptions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32, 229-263. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002965907987
- NCTM (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
- Roth, W. M., & Bowen, G. M. (2001). Professionals read graphs: A semiotic analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 159-194. https://doi.org/10.2307/749672
- Shah, P., & Hoeffner, J. (2002). Review of graph comprehension research: Implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 47-69. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013180410169
- Skalsky, N., & Pastel, R. (2004). Transportable research instrument: A PDA based laboratory for science experiments. Retrieved from http://www.cs.mtu.edu/-rpastel/Research/Documents/WMTE04SkalskyPastel.pdf
- Stylianou, D. A., Smith, B., & Kaput, J. J. (2005). Math in motion: Using CBRs to enact functions. Retrieved from https://tituscuin6397.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/ math-in-motion-using-cbrs-to-enact-functions.pdf
- Texas Instruments (1997). Getting started with the CBR. Retrieved from http://education.ti.com