DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Harmonic Preference of Primary and Secondary School Students Depending on Age and Musical Training

연령과 음악적 배경에 따른 아동 및 청소년의 화음 선호도

  • Received : 2015.04.13
  • Accepted : 2015.05.26
  • Published : 2015.05.30

Abstract

This study investigated the harmonic preference of children and adolescents depending on age and musical training. A total of 684 primary and secondary school students participated in this study. For this study, a four-measure melody was composed and constructed in four levels of harmonic complexity, determined by the rate of nonharmonic notes used and immediacy of harmonic resolution. Participants rated the degree of their perceived complexity and their preferences after listening to each musical stimulus. Ratings from the participants were analyzed in terms of the effect of age and the length of musical training. The results showed that younger students demonstrated little to no change in their preference regardless of the complexity level. Middle and high school students showed significantly decreased preference with increased harmonic complexity. High school students with more musical instrument training perceived changes in harmonic complexity more sensitively and showd higher level of optimal complexity. Younger students was affected by musical training relatively less than older students. This study presents the baseline data to be considered when determining the appropriate level of harmonic complexity for music appreciation of young population.

본 연구는 아동 및 청소년을 대상으로 연령과 음악 경험에 따라 화음 전개 복잡성에 대한 선호도가 어떻게 달라지는지 그 특성을 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 초, 중, 고등학교에 재학 중인 총 684명의 아동 및 청소년을 대상으로 실험이 실시되었다. 본 연구를 위해 4마디의 멜로디가 연구자에 의해 작곡되었고, 협화적 화음과 비화성음의 비중, 화음 해결의 즉각성 등을 바탕으로 화음 전개의 난이도가 4단계로 구성되었다. 대상자들은 4개의 음악 자극을 듣고 지각되는 복잡성과 화음 선호도의 정도를 표시하였다. 대상자들의 평가를 분석한 결과, 청소년의 연령에 따른 단계별 화음 선호도에 유의한 차이가 있었다. 선호 점수에 있어서 초등학생은 모든 단계의 화음에 높은 선호를 보인 반면, 중, 고등학생은 화음 복잡성이 증가할수록 유의하게 낮은 선호도를 보였다. 연령 외에도 악기 연주 훈련 기간 역시 화음 선호도에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 악기 연주 훈련을 보다 오래 받은 그룹이 짧게 받은 그룹보다 화음 복잡성 변화를 보다 민감하게 지각하여 개인이 수용할 수 있는 복잡성 수준이 보다 높은 것으로 나타났으며, 이는 연령이 많을 수록 더욱 분명하게 나타나는 경향이 있었다. 이러한 연구 결과는 아동 및 청소년을 위한 감상음악 선곡 시 적절한 난이도의 화음을 선택할 수 있는 기초자료로써 의의를 갖는다.

Keywords

References

  1. Acevedo-Hernandez, V. M. (2006). Characteristics of music preference decisions in fourth-, eighth-, and twelfth-grade students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Iowa, Iowa.
  2. Bae, E. Y. (2008). The effect of type of harmony and tempo on emotional response evaluation (Master's thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11577939
  3. Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  4. Bondurant-Koehler, S. (1995). The effect of selected modes of music instruction on children's music preference (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Indiana.
  5. Brittin, R. V. (2014). Young listeners' music style preferences patterns related to cultural identification and language use. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61(4), 415-430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429413509108
  6. Bruscia, K. E. (1987). Improvisation assessment profiles: The Bruscia model. In K. E. Bruscia, Improvisation models of music therapy (pp. 401-496). Illinois: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
  7. Cheston, S. B. (1994). Relationships among harmonic complexity preference, musical training and experience, and music aptitude in high school music students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Case Western Reserve University, Ohio.
  8. Chong, H. J., Yoo, G. E., & Kim, S. J. (2013). Affective responses to complexity in harmonic progression between music and nonmusic majors. Journal of Music and Theory, 21, 128-154.
  9. De Vries, P. (2010). What we want: The music preferences of upper primary school students and the ways they engage with music. Australian Journal of Music Education, 1, 3-16.
  10. Dunn, P. G., De Ruyter, B., & Bouwhuis, D. G. (2012). Toward a better understanding of the relation between music preference, listening behavior, and personality. Psychology of Music, 40(4), 411-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735610388897
  11. Ginocchio, J. F. (2006). Music style preference: A ranking of musical styles and comparison by age, gender, ethnicity, music training, and rural, suburban, or urban upbringing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ball State University, Indiana.
  12. Ginocchio, J. F. (2009). The effects of different amounts and types of music training on music style preference. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 182(1), 7-18.
  13. Greasley, A. E. (2008). Engagement with music in everyday life: An in-depth study of adults' musical preferences and listening behaviors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Keele, Staffordshire.
  14. Greasley, A. E., & Lamont, A. M. (2006). Music preference in adulthood: Why do we like the music we do. In M, Baroni, A. R. Addessi, R. Gaterina, & M. Costa (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th international conference on music perception and cognition (pp. 960-966). Bologna: University of Bologna.
  15. Hargreaves, D. J., Comber, C., & Colley, A. (1995). Effects of age, gender, and training on musical preferences of British secondary school students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43(3), 242-250. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345639
  16. Jeong, I. S. (2007). The effects of chord complexity on the brain wave activities of music specialists and non-specialists (Master's thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11220403
  17. Jung, Y. K. (2014). Perceived harmonic complexity of adults with schizophrenia (Master's thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13522241
  18. Kim, Y. H. (2000). A study of the relations between musical complexity and training and their effect on preferences in music (Master's thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8004116
  19. LeBlanc, A. (1981). Effects of style, tempo, and performing medium on children's music preference. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29(2), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345023
  20. LeBlanc, A. (1982). An interactive theory of music preference. Journal of Music Therapy, 19(1), 28-45. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/19.1.28
  21. LeBlanc, A., Jin, Y. C., Stamou, L., & McCrary, J. (1999). Effect of age, country, and gender on music listening preferences. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 141, 72-76.
  22. LeBlanc, A., Sims, W. L., Siivola, C., & Obert, M. (1996). Music style preferences of different age listeners. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345413
  23. Meyer, L. B. (1991). Emotion and meaning in music (D. W. Shin, Trans.). Seoul: Ye-sol Publisher. (Original work published 1956).
  24. Paananen, P. (2009). Children's and adolescents' harmonisation of a tonal melody. Music Education Research, 11(2), 153-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800902923294
  25. Park, K. S. (2013). The effects of music harmonic progression on emotional perception (Master's thesis). Retrieved from http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13080255
  26. Park, Y. M. (2004). Understanding of music psychology. Seoul: Music-Chunchu Publisher.
  27. Persinger, B. E. (2001). An investigation of the music preferences of adults in northeastern Colorado communities with relation to the variables of age, ethnic group, gender, musical training, and socioeconomic status (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Northern Colorado, Colorado.
  28. Radocy, R. E., & Boyle, J. D. (1997). Psychological foundations of musical behavior (3rd ed.). IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher.
  29. Schellenberg, E. G., Bigand, E., Poulin-Charronnat, B., Garnier, C., & Stevens, C. (2005). Children's implicit knowledge of harmony in Western music. Developmental Science, 8(6), 551-566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00447.x
  30. Schurig, M., Busch, V., & Strauss, J. (2012). Effects of structural and personal variables on children's development of music preference. In E. Cambouropoulos, C. Tsougras, P. Mavromatis, K. Pastiadis (Eds.). Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of Music Perception and Cognition (pp. 896-902). Thessaloniki, Greece.
  31. Smith, J. D., & Melara, R. J. (1990). Aesthetic preference and syntactic prototypicality in music: 'Tis the gift to be simple. Cognition, 34(3), 279-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90007-7
  32. Smith, K. C., & Cuddy, L. L. (1986). The pleasingness of melodic sequences: Contrasting effects of repetition and rule-familiarity. Psychology of Music, 14(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735686141002
  33. Steinbeis, N., Koelsch, S., & Sloboda, J. A. (2006). The role of harmonic expectancy violations in musical emotions: Evidence from subjective, physiological, and neural responses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(8), 1380-1393. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1380
  34. Strunk, W. O., & Treitler, L. (Eds.). (1998). Source readings in music history. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  35. Teo, T., Hargreaves, D. J., & Lee, J. (2008). Musical preference, identification, and familiarity a multicultural comparison of secondary students from Singapore and the United Kingdom. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429408322953
  36. Thaut, M. H. (1990). Neuropsychological processes in music perception and their relevance in music therapy. In R. F. Unkefer (Ed.), Music therapy in the treatment of adults with mental disorders (pp. 3-32). Barcelona Publishers.
  37. Williams, L. R. (2005). Effect of music training and musical complexity on focus of attention to melody or harmony. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53(3), 210-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242940505300303