Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회지)

Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Investigation of the Awareness for the Privacy of the Users at the School Libraries

학교도서관 이용자의 프라이버시에 대한 인식조사연구

  • Received : 2015.11.16
  • Accepted : 2015.12.14
  • Published : 2015.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research was based on the investigation of the awarenesses of librarians of issues regarding the privacy of the users of school libraries. It sought to determine if, by raising the issue of the importance of the need for the protection of the personal information of the users of the school libraries, and the implications of not paying attention to the rules in effect, the awareness regarding the privacy of the users of school libraries would be improved. For this, previous research related to the privacy of the students, the legal basis for the protection of the privacy of the domestic and foreign students, and the types of the infringements upon the protection of their personal information were investigated. A survey was conducted to measure the awareness of issues related to the privacy of the users of the library. The research showed the results as follows: First, the awarenesses regarding the privacy of the users of the school libraries appeared low, and low recognition was also found regarding the awareness of the cases of the infringements upon the privacy of the users of the school libraries; regarding the awareness in relation to the protection of privacy; regarding the seriousness of the privacy problems of the users; and regarding the factors that can encroach upon the privacy of the users. Second, regarding the seriousness felt when the library records of the users of the school libraries are leaked to the outside, 41.6% of the respondents responded by saying "It is serious", and 18.4% responded by saying "It is not serious". Third, as a result of investigating the awareness regarding whether the consent of the person concerned is needed in case a third party requests access to reading the records in the library, 68.5% of the respondent responded "It is needed", and only 10.4% responded "It is not needed". Last, in the investigation into whether the respondents had the experience of being educated as to the rules related to the privacy of the users at a school or an external organization, over 80% of the respondents answered that they did not receive it.

본 연구는 학교도서관 이용자 프라이버시에 대한 인식조사를 기반으로, 학교도서관 이용자의 개인정보보호 필요성을 제기하여 학교도서관 이용자 프라이버시에 대한 인식을 제고하는데 있다. 이를 위해 학생 프라이버시와 관련된 선행연구, 국내외 학생들의 프라이버시 보호를 위한 법적 근거 및 국내외 학생들의 개인정보보호 침해 유형 조사와 학생 프라이버시에 대한 인식을 조사하였다. 연구 결과, 첫째, 학교도서관 이용자 프라이버시에 대한 인식이 낮게 나타났으며, 학교도서관 이용자 프라이버시 침해 사례의 인식, 프라이버시 보호에 대한 인식, 이용자 프라이버시 문제에 대한 심각성, 이용자들의 프라이버시를 침해할 수 있는 요인들에 대해 낮은 인식을 보였다. 둘째, 학교도서관을 이용하는 이용자들의 도서관 기록이 외부로 유출되었을 때 느끼는 심각성에 대해서는 41.6%의 응답자들은 '심각하다'고 하였고, 18.4%는 심각하지 않다고 하였다. 셋째, 제 3자가 도서관 기록 열람을 요청할 경우, 본인의 동의가 필요한지에 대한 인식을 조사한 결과, 68.5%의 응답자가 '필요하다'고 하였고, 10.4%만이 필요하지 않다고 하였다. 넷째, 학교나 외부기관에서 이용자 프라이버시관련 교육을 받은 경험이 있는지에 대해 조사하였으며, 80% 이상의 응답자들이 받은 적이 없다고 하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 고전. 1999. 학교 법규상 기본적 인권 보장 제도와 과제. 교육법학연구, (11): 27-62.(Ko, Jeon. 1999. "School regulations on the basic Human Rights Guarantee institutions andchallenges." The Journal of Law of Education, (11): 27-62.)
  2. 국가인권위원회. 2007. 국가인권위원회 결정례집: 인권정책분야. 제2집. 서울: 국가인권위원회.(National Human Rights Commission of Korea. 2007. Decision Casebook of The National HumanRights Commission: Human rights policy area. vol 2. Soeul: National Human RightsCommission of Korea.)
  3. 서경환. 1990. 학생의 권리: 미국헌법과 한국헌법의 비교법적 연구. 석사학위논문. 서울대학교행정대학원, 법학과.(Seo Kyoung-hwan. 1990. The Rights of Students: Comparative Legal Study between Korean& American Constitution. M.A. thesis. Graduate School of Public Administration SeoulNational University, Major of Law.)
  4. 연합뉴스. 2005. 초등학생 일기장 검사는 아동인권 침해. [online]. [cited 2015.5.21]. .(Yonhapnews. 2005. Inspection about Elementary Students' Diary, Human Rights Violations.[online]. [cited 2015.5.21]..)
  5. 이수광. 2000. 학생인권 신장방안 연구. 박사학위논문. 강원대학교대학교 대학원, 교육학과.(Lee, Soo-Kwang. 2000. The New Policy Direction for Promoting and Extending Student'sRights. Ph. D., Graduate School of Kang Won National University, Major of Education.)
  6. 장순선, 이옥화. 2010. 나이스의 학생개인정보서비스 제공을 위한 인식조사. 한국정보교육학회, 14(2): 261-271.(Jang, Soonsum and Okhwa Lee. 2010. "The Development of Policy toward the Students'Access to Their Own Information on NEIS." KAIE, 14(2): 261-271.)
  7. 정형승. 2004. 교사의 교육권과 학생의 권리간의 상충과 조화. 박사학위논문. 한국교원대학교, 사회과교육학과 일반사회교육전공.(Jung, Hyun-Seung. 2004. Conflicts and Harmonies between Educational Rights. Ph. D., GraduateSchool of Korea National University of Education, Major in Social Studies Education.)
  8. 조규범. 2005. 미국의 프라이버시 법제에 관한 연구. 성균관법학, 17(3): 75-113.(Cho, Kyubeom. 2005. "Statutory Development of Privacy in the United States." The Instituteof Legal Studies, 17(3): 75-113.)
  9. 한겨레. 2005. 인권위 "초등생 일기검사 인권침해" 찬반 후끈 [online]. [cited 2015.5.21]. .(Hankyoreh. 2005. Human Rights Commission "Youth Diary inspection of human rights violations."pros and contras [online]. [cited 2015.5.21]..)
  10. 한국교육학술정보원. 2011. 독서교육지원 업무관리 매뉴얼. 서울: 한국교육학술정보원.(Korea Education and Research Information Service. 2011. Step Manual for Reading EducationSupport. Seoul: Korea Education and Research Information Service.)
  11. 한국문화관광정책연구원. 2003. 도서관및독서진흥법 개정안 연구. 서울: 한국문화관광정책연구원.(Korea Culture and Tourism Institute. 2003. Research on the Libraries and Reading PromotionAct. Seoul: Korea Culture & Tourism Institute.)
  12. 한국전산원. 2004. 국외 개인정보보호법제 분석 및 시사점. 서울: 한국전산원.(National Computerization Agency. 2004. Summary and Analysis of Key Foreign Privacy Laws.Seoul: National Computerization Agency)
  13. 한국학중앙연구원. 한국민족문화대백과사전 [online]. [cited 2015.6.1]. .((The) Academy of Korean Studies. Encyclopedia of Korea Culture [online]. [cited 2015.6.1]. .)
  14. 한승희. 2001. 정보화사회에서의 학생의 프라이버시권. 교육행정학연구, 19(1): 125-147.(Han Seung-hee. 2001. "The student's privacy rights in the information society." The KoreaEducation Administration Society, 19(1): 125-147.)
  15. 헤럴드 경제. 2014. 이응세 변화사의 법률 톡, 더욱 강화된 개인정보보호법 시행으로 더욱 안전하고 신뢰받는 정보사회되어야 [online]. [cited 2015.4.20]. .(Herald Business. 2014. Talk of Lee Yieungse Lawyer. More safe and reliable information societyshould be subject to further strengthen the Personal Information Protection Law Enforcement[online]. [cited 2015.4.20]..)
  16. Adams, Helen R. 2011. "The Privacy Problem." School Library Journal, 57(4): 34-37.
  17. Adams, Helen R. 2013. Protecting Intellectual Freedom and Privacy in your School Library. California: Libraries Unlimited.
  18. Adams, Helen R. 2014. "Practical Ideas: Protecting Students' Privacy in Your School Library." School Library Monthly, 30(6): 29-30.
  19. Hildebrand, Janet. 1991. "Is Privacy Reserved for Adults?." School Library Journal, 91(37): 21-25.
  20. Kim, Dong-Seok and Younghee Noh. 2014. "A Study of Public Library Patrons' Understanding of Library Records and Data Privacy." International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, 4(1): 53-78. https://doi.org/10.5865/IJKCT.2014.4.1.053
  21. Minkel, Walter. 2002. "Fingerprinting Kids Unpopular in U.S." School Library Journal, 48(9): 22.
  22. Minkel, Walter. 2004. "AK to Nix Kids' Privacy Rights." School Library Journal, 50(4): 22-22.
  23. Noh, Younghee. 2014. "Digital Library User Privacy: Changing Librarian Viewpoints through Education." Library Hi Tech, 32(2): 300-317. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-08-2013-0103
  24. Riehl, Donna. 2006. "Students' Privacy Rights in School Libraries: Balancing Principles, Ethics and Practices." School Libraries in Canada, 26(2): 32-42.

Cited by

  1. 전자정부서비스에 대한 개인정보제공의 영향요인 vol.26, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5859/kais.2017.26.1.53