DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Seeding Method and Pre-emergence Herbicides on Plant Growth and the Production of Sorghum × Sudangrass Hybrid

파종 방법과 토양처리용 제초제 처리가 수수 × 수단그라스 교잡종의 생육 및 생산성에 미치는 영향

  • Jung, Jeong Sung (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Ki-Won (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Choi, Ki Choon (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Ji, Hee Jung (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Park, Hyung Soo (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Won Ho (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Young-Jin (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Sang Hak (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Hoon (National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Received : 2015.02.16
  • Accepted : 2015.03.10
  • Published : 2015.03.31

Abstract

The following experiments were used to evaluate the effect of seeding method and pre-emergence herbicides on weed control and the production of the $sorghum{\times}sudangrass$ [sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] hybrid under field and in vitro conditions. Under the in vitro condition, we evaluated how different kinds of herbicides affect the rate of seed germination and the growth of early seedlings in the $sorghum{\times}sudangrass$ hybrid treated with herbicides. Simazine, alachlor, and methabenzthiazuron were used, and their concentration levels were 0%, 40%, 70%, and 100%. The germination ratio of the seeds was reduced by the application of simazine, methabenzthiazuron, and alachlor compared with the control (distilled water). The alachlor application severely decreased the sorghum germination ratio. However, seed germination was not greatly influenced by the concentration level of the herbicides. Root and shoot length were increased in the following order: control > simazine > methabenzthiazuron > alachlor. Overall, alachlor significantly reduced root length more than shoot length. The differential tolerance of the $sorghum{\times}sudangrass$ hybrid to pre-emergence herbicides by seeding method was then tested under the field condition. The plants were severely injured by the alachlor application, leading to a great reduction in the number of stems. However, for the simazine and methabenzthiazuron applications the number of stems lost was slightly lower than it was for the alachlor and simazine + alachlor applications. In the seeding method, drilling was more effective in reducing herbicide injury than broadcasting. All of the herbicides effectively controlled weeds. The simazine and methabenzthiazuron applications showed a significantly higher dry matter (DM) yield. However, the alachlor and simazine + alachlor applications severely reduced the DM yield. This result suggests that the alachlor application has a significant effect on plant production. Similarly, the total digestible nutrient (TDN) yield was greatly reduced by the alachlor and simazine + alachlor applications. From the results presented above, we concluded that the yield of DM was the highest for broadcasting with no herbicide. and drilling was the most-effective way to reduce herbicide injury. The simazine application was the most-effective herbicide, showing the highest forage yield and TDN yield.

본 시험은 사료용 수수${\times}$수단그라스 교잡종의 파종방법 및 제초제 종류에 따른 약해 및 생산성을 비교하여 안전 재배기술을 개발하고자 국립축산과학원 초지사료과 시험포장에서 수행하였다. 제초제 종류별 수수${\times}$수단그라스 교잡종의 in vitro 조건에서 발아율 분석결과 control > simazine > methaventhiazuron > alachlor 순으로 나타났으며 alachlor 처리시 shoot의 길이는 1~1.3 cm 범위로 무처리 4.37 cm와 비교했을 때 약 1/4배 정도로 짧은 것으로 나타났으며 root는 발생되지 않은 것으로 보아 alachlor는 shoot 보다 root에 약해를 더 심하게 주는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 포장시험에서 제초제 종류에 따른 약해는 in vitro 시험과 마찬가지로 alachlor에서 가장 심하게 나타났으며 파종방법에서는 조파가 약해를 더 적게 받는 것으로 나타났다. 잔주수의 경우 alachlor와 simazine + alachlor에서 적었으며 제초제 처리시 파종방법에 따라 조파의 경우보다 산파에서 alachlor와 simazine + alachlor 처리에 따른 잔주수 감소가 더 크게 나타났다. 건물수량의 경우 제초제 종류별로 보면 조파의 경우 simazine과 methabenzthiazuron에서 각각 무처리 대비 101%와 99%의 수량을 보였고 alachlor와 simazine + alachlor에서는 각각 무처리 대비 32%와 56%였다. 산파의 경우 simazine과 methabenzthiazuron에서 각각 무처리 대비 89%와 84%의 수량을 보였고 alachlor와 simazine + alachlor에서는 각각 무처리 대비 13%와 29%로 나타났으며, alachlor 보다 simazine과 methabenzthiazuron이 건물수량 감소가 적었으며 제초제 처리시 산파보다 조파가 alachlor에 대한 약해를 덜 받는 것으로 나타났다. TDN 수량 역시 건물수량과 비슷한 경향을 보였으며 alachlor와 simazine + alachlor 모두에서 TDN 수량이 가장 낮게 나왔으며 제초제 처리시 산파보다는 조파의 경우가 제초제 시용에 따른 수량감소가 적은 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Burnside, O. and Wicks, G. 1969. Influence of weed competition on sorghum growth. Weed Science: 332-334.
  2. AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis. Vol. I. 15th ed. AOAC, Arlington, VA.
  3. Dar, W.D., Reddy, B., Gowda, C. and Ramesh, S. 2006. Genetic resources enhancement of ICRISAT-mandate crops. Current Science 91:880-884.
  4. Feltner, K., Hurst, H. and Anderson, L. 1969. Tall waterhemp competition in grain sorghum. Weed Science: 214-216.
  5. Fenoll, J., Flores, P., Hellin, P., Hernandez, J. and Navarro, S. 2014. Minimization of methabenzthiazuron residues in leaching water using amended soils and photocatalytic treatment with $TiO_2$ and ZnO. J Environ Sci (China) 26:757-764. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(13)60511-2
  6. Goering, H. and Van Soest, P.J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agricultural handbook no. 379. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC: 1-20.
  7. Heege, H. 1993. Seeding methods performance for cereals, rape, and beans. Transactions of the ASAE (USA).
  8. Holland, C., Kezar, W., Kautz, W.P., Lazowski, E.J., Mahanna, W.C. and Reinhart, R. 1990. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., Desmoines, IA.
  9. Ferrell, J.A., MacDonald, G.E. and Brecke2. B.J. 2007. weed management in sorghum. FLORIDA FORAGE.
  10. Ketchersid, M. and Merkle, M. 1981. The effect of CGA-43089 on absorption and metabolism of metolachlor in grain sorghum. Abstr. Proc. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer.
  11. Ketchersid, M., Norton, K. and Merkle, M. 1981. Influence of soil moisture on the safening effect of CGA-43089 in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Weed Science: 281-287.
  12. Kim, J.D., Kwon, C.H., Kim, H.J., Park, J.G., Lee, B.S., Bing, G.S., et al. 2002. Comparison of agronomic characteristics hybrid. J. Korean Grassl. Sci. 22:297-302. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2002.22.4.297
  13. Korea Crop Protection Association. 2012. Agrochemicals use guide book.
  14. LeBaron, H.M., Mc Farland, J. and Burnside, O. 2011. The triazine herbicides Elsevier.
  15. Lee, S.S. and Choi, S.J. 1989. Tolerance of corn, sorghum, sorghumsudangrass hybrid, and pearl millet to simazine and alachlor. Korean J. Crop Sci. 34: 113-119.
  16. Lim, S.H. and Kim, D.A. 1983. Effect of Seeding Rate and Herbicides on the Yield and Weed Control of Sorghum-Sudangrass Hybrid (Sorghum bicolr (L.) Moench). J. Korean Grassl. Sci. 4: 62-69.
  17. Moore, J. 1970. Procedures for the two-stage in vitro digestion of forages. Nutrition research techniques for domestic and wild animals. Utah state Univ. 1: 5001-5003.
  18. O, S.M. and Han, H.J. 1993. Effect of chemical control of weed on upland fields in forage crop. RDA Annual Reports : 235-246.
  19. Pyon, J.Y. and Kim, T.H. 1983. Response of barley cultivars to butachlor, terbutryn, and methabenzthiazuron. Korean Journal of weed science 3:100-104.
  20. Quinby, J.R. 1974. Sorghum improvement and the genetics of growth. TX: Texas A&M University Press.
  21. RDA. 2012. Investigation and analysis of research and technology in agriculture.
  22. SAS. 2002. Statistical Analysis System Version. 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
  23. Seo, S. and Kim, D.A. 1984. Effect of nitrogen fertilization and cutting management on the carbohydrate reserves, regrowth, and dry matter yield of sorghm-sudangrass hybrid (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) for forage production. IV. Effect of nitrogen fertilization and cutting stage on the dead stubble, carbohydrate reserves, and dry matter yield of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid. Han'guk Ch'uksan Hakhoe chi = Korean journal of animal sciences. J. Korean Grassl. Sci. 26(1):88-94.
  24. Shakoor, A., Islam, S. and Naeem, M. 2000. Efficacy of different herbicides for control of weeds in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) under rainfed conditions. Pak J Biol Sci 3:463-465. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2000.463.465
  25. Tilley, J. and Terry, R. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass and Forage science 18: 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x
  26. Wilkinson, R. 1981. Metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl) acetamide] inhibition of gibberellin precursor biosynthesis. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 16: 199-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-3575(81)90053-5
  27. Wilkinson, R. 1982. alachlor influence on sorghum growth and gibberellin precursor synthesis. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 17:177-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-3575(82)90023-2
  28. Yoana, N., John, E., Wilfred, V. and David, W. 2010. Forage Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor): Overview and Management1. FLORIDA FORAGE: 65.

Cited by

  1. Evaluating the Adsorption Potential of Alachlor and Its Subsequent Removal from Soils via Activated Carbon vol.27, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2018.1470604