DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigating Change of Users' Perception of Privacy Pre- and Post-Education on Library User Privacy

도서관이용자프라이버시에 대한 교육전후의 이용자인식변화 분석 연구

  • 노영희 (건국대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 김태경 (국립중앙도서관 도서관연구소) ;
  • 김동석 (마포구립서강도서관)
  • Received : 2015.02.24
  • Accepted : 2015.03.16
  • Published : 2015.03.30

Abstract

Library users must provide their personal information to libraries. This study surveyed these library users' perception of privacy and the effect of the education after providing library user privacy education. As a result, first, it was found that after education, users were more interested in their privacy, rated the problem of library user privacy as more severe, and rated library user data collection as more likely to be considered privacy invasion. Second, we investigated users' perception of how much user service records being collected in libraries violate users' privacy, which showed a great perception change in 25 questions after the education. Third, in the survey about library and librarians' efforts for protecting library user privacy, it was found that all 15 questions were rated as significantly more important after education. Fourth, library users have recognized that is necessary to process and handle the library record and are more sympathetic to the need for this procedure. Fifth, library users felt the possibility of a library record leak was a very serious threat.

이용자들은 도서관을 이용하기 위해 개인정보를 도서관에 제공해야 한다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 이용자들을 대상으로 도서관 이용자 프라이버시에 대한 인식을 조사하고 프라이버시 관련 교육을 제공한 후 교육효과를 측정하고자 하였다. 그 결과, 첫째, 본인 프라이버시에 대한 관심도, 도서관 이용자 프라이버시 문제의 심각성, 프라이버시 침해 가능한 도서관 데이터요소 등에서 교육 후 인식변화가 크게 일어났다. 둘째, 이용자들은 현재 도서관에서 수집하고 있는 이용자에 대한 서비스 기록이 이용자 프라이버시를 어느 정도 침해할 것이라고 생각하고 있는지에 대해 25개 항목 모두에서 교육 후 큰 인식 변화가 있었다. 셋째, 도서관 이용자 프라이버시 보호를 위해 도서관 및 사서가 수행해야 할 노력에 대해 15개의 문항 모두 교육 후 평균값이 유의하게 올라갔음을 알 수 있었다. 넷째, 도서관 이용자는 도서관 기록의 열람 및 취급에 있어 정당한 절차가 필요하다고 인식하게 되었으며 이를 위한 절차의 필요성에 공감하고 있다는 것을 알 수 있다. 다섯째, 도서관 기록이 유출되었을 경우 이용자가 느끼는 심각성은 매우 높은 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강순희 (2003). 사서 및 정보서비스직의 윤리의식에 관한 연구. 시민과도서관, 4(4), 20-59. (Kang, Sun-Hui (2003). A study on ethic of librarians and information services job. Library with People, 4(4), 20-59.)
  2. 김혜선 (1994). 사서직 윤리에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교 대학원, 문헌정보학과. (Kim, Hye-Sun (1994). A study on ethics in librarianship. M. A. thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.)
  3. 노영희 (2012a). 도서관의 개인정보보호정책 개발 및 제안에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 46(4), 207-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.4.207 (Noh, Younghee (2012a). A study on developing and proposing the library privacy policy. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(4), 207-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.4.207)
  4. 노영희 (2012b). 디지털도서관서비스기록과 이용자프라이버시에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 29(3), 187-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.3.187 (Noh, Younghee (2012b). A study of digital library service records and user privacy. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 29(3), 187-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.3.187)
  5. 노영희 (2013). 도서관 이용자 프라이버시에 대한 사서인식 조사연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 47(3), 73-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.3.073 (Noh, Younghee (2013). A study on librarians perception of library user privacy. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 47(3), 73-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.3.073)
  6. 이미화 (2006). 프라이버시 및 도서관 기록에 대한 이용자 인식조사. 사대도협회지, 7, 225-240. (Lee, Mi-Hwa (2006). A study on user perceptions about privacy and library records. The Journal of the Korean Private University Library Association, 7, 225-240.)
  7. 임리사, 변나향, 최재필, 임승빈 (2010). 대학도서관 열람실 시각적 프라이버시와 좌석선호도의 관계 분석. 대한건축학회 논문집, 26(5), 139-147. (Lim, Lisa, Byun, Na-Hyang, Choi, Jae-Pil, & Im, Seung-Bin (2010). An analysis of the relationship between visual privacy and preference of seats of university library. The Architectural Institute of Korea, 26(5), 139-147.)
  8. ALA (2002). Privacy: An interpretation of the library bill of rights. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/Template.cfm?Section=interpretations&Template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=132904
  9. Blitz, M. J. (2006). Constitutional safeguards for silent experiments in living: Libraries, the right to read, and a first amendment theory for an unaccompanied right to receive information. University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, 74, 799.
  10. Bowers, S. L. (2008). Self-service holds: A violation of library patron's privacy. Public Libraries, 47(4), 54-57.
  11. Gardner, C. (2002). Fact or fiction : Privacy in american libraries. The 12th Conference on Computers Freedom & Privacy. Retrieved from http://www.cfp2002.org/proceedings/proceedings/gardner.pdf
  12. Garoogian, R. (1991). Librarian/Patron confidentiality: An ethical challenge. Library Trends, 40(2), 216-233.
  13. Johnston, S. D. (2000). Rethinking privacy in the public library. The International Information & Library Review, 32(3-4), 509-517. https://doi.org/10.1006/iilr.2000.0150
  14. Klinefelter, A. (2007). Privacy and library public services: Or, I know what you read last summer. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 26(1-2), 253-279.
  15. Madison Public Library (2012). USA Patriot Act and Madison Public Library Records. Retrieved from http://www.madisonpubliclibrary.org/policies/usa-patriot-act-and-madison-public-library-records
  16. Pariser, E. (2011). 10 Ways to pop your filter bubble. Retrieved from http://www.thefilterbubble.com/10-things-you-can-do
  17. Pariser, E. (2011). Beware online filter bubbles. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/eli_pariser_beware_online_filter_bubbles.html
  18. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet Is hiding from you. New York: The Penguin Press.
  19. Peralta, E. (2012). Google admits it did not delete data taken from Wifi devices. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/07/27/157494565/google-admits-it-did-notdelete-data-taken-from-wi-fi-devices
  20. Shils, E. (1966). Privacy: Its constitution and vicissitudes. Law and Contemporary Problems, 31(2), 281-306. https://doi.org/10.2307/1190672
  21. Shuler, J. (2004). Privacy and academic libraries: Widening the frame of discussion. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(2), 157-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2004.01.008
  22. Sturges, P., Eric, D., James, D., Ursula, I., Ursula, I., Charles, O., & Rachel, H. (2003). User privacy in the digital library environment: An investigation of policies and preparedness. Library Management, 24(1-2), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435120310454502