DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

하천 복원을 위한 과거 및 현재 자료 기반의 하천지형학적 특성 분석: 미호천과 내성천을 중심으로

Analysis on Fluvial Geomorphological Characteristics based on Past and Present Data for River Restoration: An Application to the Miho River and the Naesung River

  • 이찬주 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원.하천연구소) ;
  • 김지성 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원.하천연구소) ;
  • 김규호 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원.하천연구소) ;
  • 신형섭 (네이처앤휴먼)
  • Lee, Chan Joo (Hydro Science and Engineering Research Institute, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology) ;
  • Kim, Ji Sung (Hydro Science and Engineering Research Institute, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology) ;
  • Kim, Kyu Ho (Hydro Science and Engineering Research Institute, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology) ;
  • Shin, Hyoung Sub (Nature and Human Co.)
  • 투고 : 2014.11.27
  • 심사 : 2015.02.10
  • 발행 : 2015.03.31

초록

하천 복원을 위한 기초 작업으로서 자연 상태에 가까운 하천의 지형학적 특성을 파악하기 위해 과거 및 현재 자료를 이용하여 하천지형학적 분석을 실시하였다. 대상 하천은 미호천과 내성천이다. 분석에 포함된 지형학적 변수는 하곡변수인 곡저폭, 하도 형상변수인 사행도, 강턱하폭, 하도경사, 구성재료 변수인 하상재료, 지배 변수인 강턱유량, 비유수력이며, 지배적인 프로세스가 함께 고려되었다. 분석 결과 두 하천은 비슷한 유역면적을 갖는 모래하천이지만, 곡저폭, 하도 형상변수, 종단적 위치에 따른 지배적인 프로세스 등에서 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 지형학적 변수들 사이의 상호 관계를 분석하였다. 그 결과 강턱하폭은 강턱유량에 비례하여 증가하였고, 그 경향성은 기존의 연구 결과와 대체로 일치하고 있다. 강턱유량과 하도경사를 분석한 결과 미호천은 사행하천과 망상하천의 특성을 나타내고 있는 반면, 내성천은 대부분의 구간에서 망상하천에 해당하는 것으로 나타났다. 하도경사와 하폭수심비 관계를 이용하여 지배적인 프로세스를 분석한 결과 미호천은 사구-연흔의 특성을 나타내고 있으나 내성천은 하류에서는 망상하천 특성이 지배적인 반면, 상류에서는 여울-소 내지는 평하상 특성이 지배적인 것으로 나타났다. 과거 자료를 이용한 분석 결과는 정비된 하천의 자료를 이용한 분석 결과에 비해 합리적인 것으로 나타났다.

As a basic work for river restoration, analysis on fluvial geomorphological characteristics is made using past and present data to understand close-to-nature geomorphic status. The Miho and the Naesung Rivers are targets of this study. Fluvial geomorphic variables including valley-floor width, sinuosity, bankfull width, channel gradient, bed material size, bankfull discharge and unit stream power are evaluated with dominant processes. Though common sand-bed rivers with similar catchment area, the Miho and the Naesung Rivers are different in terms of valley-floor width, channel shape variables and dominant processes related with longitudinal location. In addition, analyses on interrelationship among the geomorphological variables are carried. Bankfull width is shown to be proportional to bankfull discharge, as is in a rough agreement with the previous studies. Relationship of bankfull discharge and channel gradient shows meandering and braiding are prevalent in the Miho River, whereas the most of the sub-reaches of the Naesung River fall to braiding. Relationship of channel gradient with width-depth ratio indicates dune-ripple processes are dominant in the Miho River, while the Naesung River shows longitudinal diversity from braiding in the downstream sub-reaches to riffle-pool and plane-bed along the upper ones. Analyses based on the past data on a river in a close-to-nature status are thought to be rather reasonable in comparison with those on the same river in a engineered condition.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bae, S-H. (2007). "Urban change analysis using the 1:50,000 topographical map which is produced at 1910's." Journal of the Korean Association ofGeographic Information Studies, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 93-103.
  2. Bray, D.I. (1982). Regime equations for gravel-bed rivers. In: Hey, R. D., Bathurst, J. C., Thorne, C. R. (Eds.), Gravel-bed rivers, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 517-542.
  3. Brookes, A. (1987). "Restoring the sinuousity of artificially straightened stream channels." Environmental Geological Water Science, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02588003
  4. Buffington, J.M., and Montgomery, D.R. (2013). "Geomorphic Classification of Rivers." Treatise on Geomorphology, Vol. 9. Fluvial Geomorphology, Ed. Wohl. E., pp. 730-767.
  5. Bull, W.B. (1979). "Threshold of critical power in streams." Bulletin of Geological Society of America, Vol. 90, pp. 353-464.
  6. Gallant, J.C., and Dowling, T.I. (2003). "A multiresolution index of valley bottom flatness for mapping depositional areas." Water Resources Research, Vol. 39, No. 12, p. 1347.
  7. Gyeongsangbukdo (1985). Basic plan for the Naesung River Improvement (in Korean)
  8. Gyeongsangbukdo (2002). Basic plan for the Naesung River Improvement (in Korean)
  9. Henderson, F.M. (1961). "Stability of alluvial channels." Journal of the Hydraulics Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 87, pp. 109-138.
  10. Hey, R.D., and Thorne, C.R. (1986). "Stable channels with mobile gravel beds." Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 112, No. 8, pp. 671-689. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1986)112:8(671)
  11. Hong, I. (2014). "Present status and type of the river restoration projects." Construction Brief, 2014-09.
  12. Iversen, T.M., Kronvang, B., Madsen, B.L., Markmann, P., and Nielsen, M.B. (1993). "Re-establishment of Danish streams: restoration and maintenance measures." Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystem, Vol. 3, pp. 73-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3270030203
  13. JGGK (The Japanese Government General of Korea (1938). Annual Report on the National River Construction Works (1938) (in Korean)
  14. JGGK (The Japanese Government General of Korea) (1920). Survey on flood control and water use (in Korean)
  15. JGGK (The Japanese Government General of Korea) (1929). Investigation on the Korean Rivers (in Korean)
  16. JGGK (The Japanese Government General of Korea) (1937). Record on Civil Engineering Works on the Korean Rivers by 1928-River Improvement Part (1937). (in Korean)
  17. Kim, H-J., Shin, B-K., and Kim, W. (2014). "A study on hydromorphology and vegetation features depending on typology of natural streams in Korea." Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 215-234. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2014.28.2.215
  18. K-Water (Korea Water Resources Corporation) (2010). Report on Implementation Design for the Youngju Dam (in Korean)
  19. KWRA (Korea Water Resources Association) (2004) River design standard and explanation (in Korean)
  20. Lane, E.W. (1957). "A study of the shape of channels formed by natural streams flowing in erodible material." MRD Sediment Series 9, US Army Engineer Division, Missouri River
  21. Lee, J.W., Chun, S.H., Kim, K-H., and Kim, C.W. (2014). "Flow analysis based on the recovery of lateral connectivity in the river." Journal of Korean Wetlands Society, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 213-220.
  22. Lee., C.J., Lee, D.H., Kim, K.H., and Woo, H.S. (2004). "Examination into the applicability of the river classification system based on the geomorphological criteria." Journal of the Korean Water Resources Association, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 1-11 https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2004.37.1.001
  23. Leopold, L.B., and Maddock, T. (1953). The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications, US Geological Survey Professional Paper 252
  24. Leopold, L.B., and Wolman, M.G. (1957). River channel patterns: Braided, meandering and straight, US Geological Survey Professional Paper 282-B.
  25. MLTM (Ministry of Land, Maritime and Transportation) (2011). Basic plan for the Miho River (in Korean)
  26. MLTM (Ministry of Land, Maritime and Transportation) (2013). Basic plan for the Naesung River (in Korean)
  27. MOE (Ministry of Environment) (2011). Technical Specification (in Korean)
  28. Montgomery, D.R., and Buffington, J.M. (1993). Channel classification, prediction of channel response and assessment of channel condition, Report prepared for the SHAMW committee of the Washington State Timber/Fish/Wildlife Agreement
  29. Nam, Y-W. (2007). "Making topographic maps of Korea during imperial reign and Japanese colonial rule." Journal of the Korean Cartographic Association, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 19-29.
  30. Nanson, G.C., and Croke, J.C. (1992). "A genetic classification of floodplains." Geomorphology, Vol. 4, pp. 459-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-555X(92)90039-Q
  31. Parker, G. (1976). "On the cause and characteristic scales of meandering and braiding in rivers." Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 76, pp. 457-480. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112076000748
  32. Rosgen, D.L. (1994). "A classification of natural rivers." Catena, Vol. 22, pp. 169-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(94)90001-9
  33. Soar, P.J., and Thorne, C.R. (2001). Channel Restoration Design for Meandering Rivers, USACE Coastal and Hydraulic Laboratory Report, ERDC/CHL CR-01-1, 437p.
  34. USACE (United States Army Corps of Engineers) (1994). Engineering and Design: Channel stability assessment for flood control channels. Engineering Manual 1110-2-1418, CECW-EH-D, United States Department of the Army, Washington, D.C
  35. VANR (Vermont Agency of Natural Resources) (2009). Vermont Stream Geomorphic Assessment
  36. Wilkerson, G.V. (2008). "Improved bankfull discharge prediction using 2-year recurrence-period discharge." Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 44, No. 1. pp 243-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00151.x
  37. Williams, G.P. (1978). "Bank-Full Discharge of Rivers." Water Resources Research, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 1141-1154. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR014i006p01141
  38. Wohl, E. (2014). Rivers in the Landscape: Science and Management. Wiley-Blackwell. 330p.
  39. Wolman, M.G., and Leopold, L.B. (1957). River Flood Plains: Some Observations on Their Formation. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 282-C, pp. 87-109.
  40. Woodyer, K.D. (1968). "Bankfull frequency in rivers", Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 6, pp. 114-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(68)90155-8