지능정보연구 (Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems)

  • 제21권1호
  • /
  • Pages.47-63
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2288-4866(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4882(eISSN)
한국지능정보시스템학회 (Korea Intelligent Information System Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기업용 마이크로블로그의 사용행태에 대한 사례연구: 지식경영전략을 중심으로

Case Study on the Enterprise Microblog Usage: Focusing on Knowledge Management Strategy

  • 강민수 (경희대학교 대학원 경영학과) ;
  • 박아름 (경희대학교 빅데이타 연구센터) ;
  • 이경전 (경희대학교 경영대학)
  • Kang, Min Su (Department of Business Administration, Graduate School, KyungHee University) ;
  • Park, Arum (School of Management and The Management Research Institute, KyungHee University) ;
  • Lee, Kyoung-Jun
  • 투고 : 2014.11.10
  • 심사 : 2015.03.10
  • 발행 : 2015.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

지식경영전략은 코드화(Codification) 전략과 대인화(Personalization) 전략으로 대별할 수 있으며(Hansen et al., 1999), 성공적인 지식경영의 도입과 활용을 위한 두 전략의 운영 방안에 대한 연구가 계속되어 왔다. 그리고 지식경영 시스템에 대한 기존 연구는 주로 대기업의 일부 조직에서 활용한 사례를 대상으로 하고 있어, 중소 규모의 기업 전체를 대상으로 하는 연구는 미비한 실정이다. 본 논문은 중소 규모의 기업에 적합한 지식경영 시스템으로 기업용 마이크로블로그를 특정하고, 기업용 마이크로블로그를 활용한 중소기업의 지식경영전략을 코드화 전략과 대인화 전략의 관점에서 검토한다. 지식경영전략과 기업용 마이크로블로그에 대한 선행연구를 통하여 "기업의 성장에 따라 기업용 마이크로블로그의 활용은 코드화 전략에서 대인화 전략 중심으로 변화한다"는 가설을 설정하였다. 이 가설을 확인하기 위하여 창업 초기부터 현재까지 '야머'(Yammer)라는 기업용 마이크로블로그를 사용하고 있는 소규모 기업을 대상으로 사례연구를 진행하였다. 사례연구는 기업용 마이크로블로그의 사용 기간을 창업 '초기', 현재의 조직 형태를 갖추게 된 '중기', 그리고 연구가 진행된 '현재' 등 세 시점으로 나누고 콘텐츠를 분석하는 종단 분석을 실시하였다. 그리고 각 시점별 야머에 등록된 콘텐츠의 커뮤니케이션 유형을 분석하여 사례기업의 기업용 마이크로블로그 사용행태를 분석하고, 지식경영전략의 변화를 확인하는 방법을 사용하였다. 연구의 결과로 소규모 기업에서 지식경영전략의 운영과 그에 적합한 지식경영 시스템의 활용에 대한 실질적인 시사점을 제시하고자 한다.

As knowledge is paid attention as a new production factor that generates added value, studies continue to apply knowledge management to business environment. In addition, as ICT (Information Communication Technology) was engrafted in business environment, it leads to increasing task efficiency and productivity of individual workers. Accordingly, the way that a business achieves its goal has changed to one in which its individual members are willing to take part in the organization and share information to create new values (Han, 2003) and studies for the system and service to support such transition are carrying out. Of late, a new concept called 'Enterprise 2.0' newly appears. It is the extension of Wen 2.0 and its technology, which focus on participation, sharing and openness, to the work environment of a business (Jung, 2013). Enterprise 2.0 is being used as a collaborative tool to prop up individual creativity and group brain power by combining Web 2.0 technologies such as blog, Wiki, RSS and tag with business software (McAfee, 2006). As Tweeter gets popular, Enterprise Microblog (EMB), which is an example of Enterprise 2.0 for business, has been developed as equivalent to Tweeter in business circle and SaaS (Software as a Service) such as Yammer was introduced The studies of EMB mainly focus on demonstrating its usability in terms of intra-firm communication and knowledge management. However existing studies lean too much towards large-sized companies and certain departments, rather than a company as a whole. Therefore, few studies have been conducted on small and medium-sized companies that have difficulty preparing separate resources and supplying exclusive workforce to introduce knowledge management. In this respect, the present study placed its analytic focus on small-sized companies actually equipped with EMB to know how they use it. And, based on the findings, this study examined their knowledge management strategies for EMB from the point of codification and personalization. Hypothesis -"as a company grows, it shifts EMB strategy from codification to personalization'- was established on the basis of reviewing precedent studies and literature. To demonstrate the hypothesis, this study analyzed the usage of EMB by small companies that have used it from foundation. For case study, the duration of the use was divided into 2 spans and longitudinal analysis was employed to examine the contents of the blogs. Using the key findings of the analysis, this study is aimed to propose practical implications for the operation of knowledge management of small-sized company and the suitable application of knowledge management system for operation Knowledge Management Strategy can be classified by codification strategy and personalization strategy (Hansen et. al., 1999), and how to manage the two strategies were always studied. Also, current studies regarding the knowledge management strategy were targeted mostly for major companies, resulting in lack of studies in how it can be applied on SMEs. This research, with the knowledge management strategy suited for SMEs, sets an Enterprise Microblog (EMB), and with the EMB applied on SMEs' Knowledge Management Strategy, it is reviewed on the perspective of SMEs' Codification and Personalization Strategies. Through the advanced research regarding Knowledge Management Strategy and EMB, the hypothesis is set that "Depending on the development of the company, the main application of EMB alters from Codification Strategy to Personalization Strategy". To check the hypothesis, SME that have used the EMB called 'Yammer' was analyzed from the date of their foundation until today. The case study has implemented longitudinal analysis which divides the period when the EMBs were used into three stages and analyzes the contents. As the result of the study, this suggests a substantial implication regarding the application of Knowledge Management Strategy and its Knowledge Management System that is suitable for SME.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alavi, M. and D. E. leidner, "Review; Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues," MIS Quarterly, Vol.25, No.1(2001), pp.107-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
  2. Becerra-Fernandez I. and R. Sabherwal, "Organizational knowledge management: A contingency perspective," Journal of management information systems, Vol.18, No.1(2001), 23-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045676
  3. Bierly, P. and A. Chakrabarti, "Generic Knowledge Strategies in the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17, (1996), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171111
  4. Choi, B. G. and H. S. Lee, "Analysis of corporate performance based on knowledge management styles," Proceedings of the Korea Society of Management information Systems Conference, 2000, 654-663.
  5. Foray, D. and B. Lundvall, "The knowledge-based economy: from the economics of knowledge to the learning economy," The economic impact of knowledge, (1998), 115-121.
  6. Han, S. E., "Construction and Operation of Effective Knowledge Management System," Proceedings of 2003 Informatization Policy Seminar on Seoul Association for Public Administration, (2003), 216-236.
  7. Hansen, M., N. Nohria, and T. Tierney, "What's your Strategy for Managing Knowledge?," Harvard Business Review, March-April (1999), 106-116.
  8. Howard, Z. and D. Ryan, "Replacing the watercooler: connecting through enterprise microblogging," Proceedings of the 15th VALA Biennial Conference and Exhibition, (2010).
  9. Kang, B.-Y., "A Comparition on the Knowledge Management Level of Small Firms," Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, Vol.8, No.2(2002), 37-49.
  10. Kang, S.-H. and S. Chung, "Knowledge Management and RAD Performance of Venture Firms," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Venture Studies, Vol.5, No.3(2002), 31-60.
  11. Kankanhalli, A., F. Tanudidijaja, J. Sutanto, and B. C. Tan, "The role of IT in successful knowledge management initiatives," Communications of the ACM, Vol.46.No.9 (2003), 69-73. https://doi.org/10.1145/903893.903896
  12. Kim, J., S.-H. Yoo and Y.-G. Kim, "An Exploratory Case Study on the Factors Affecting the Knowledge Management System Performance," Korean Management Science Review, Vol.20, No.1 (2003), 1-23.
  13. Koo, G, B., "Study on the Success Factors for Knowledge Management System," Proceedings of the Korea Association of Information Systems, (2000), 275-284.
  14. Jordan, J. and P. Jones, "Assessing your Company's Knowledge Management Style," Long Range Planning, Vol.30, No.3(1997), 392-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(97)90254-5
  15. Jung B. H., "Role Based Social Software Platform Model for Enterprise 2.0," Master's Thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, Ajou University, 2013.
  16. Lee, H.-S., Y.-S. Chang, and B.-G. Choi, "Analysis of Effects of Knowledge Management Strategies On Corporate Performance," Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, Vol.5, No.2(1999), 99-120.
  17. Lee, K. C. and S. J. Kwon, "Derivation of Industry-Specific Knowledge Management Framework and Its Empirical Validity," Korean Management Review, Vol.30, No.3, (2001), 957-986.
  18. Lee, K.-c., S.-j. Kwon, and K.-y. Lee, "A Self-Organizing Map Neural Network Approach to Segmenting Knowledge Management Type of Venture Business in KOSDAQ," Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, Vol.7, No.2(2001), 95-115.
  19. Lee, Y.-C., "Dynamic Value Chain Modeling of Knowledge Management," The Journal of Information Systems, Vol.17, No.3(2008), 205-233. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2008.17.3.205
  20. Madhavan, R. and R. Grover, "From Embedded Knowledge: New Product Development Times: Six Case Studies," The Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62, No. 4(1998), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252283
  21. McAfee, A. P., "Enterprise 2.0-the dawn of emergent collaboration," MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 47, No. 3(2006), 21-28.
  22. Min, S. K., "The Impact of enterprise SNS on business performances in organization," Master's Thesis, The Graduate School of Information, Yonsei University, 2011.
  23. Muller, J. and S. Alexander, "Enterprise Microblogging at Siemens, Building Technologies Division: A Descriptive Case Study," Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies, (2010), 29-40.
  24. Nevis, E. C., A. J. DiBella, and J. M. Gould, "Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems," Sloan Management Review, Vol. 36, No.2(1995), 73-85.
  25. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge-Creating Company, Oxford University Press, 1995.
  26. Polanyi, M., Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1962.
  27. Polanyi, M., The Tacit Dimension, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1966.
  28. Prusak, L., Knowledge in Organizations, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997.
  29. Riemer, K. and A. Richter, "Tweet Inside: Microblogging in a Corporate Context," Proceedings of the 23rd Bled eConference, (2010), 1-17.
  30. Riemer, K., A. Altenhofen, and A. Richter, "what are you doing?-enterprise microblogging as context building," Proceedings of ECIS 2011, (2011), 252.
  31. Riemer, K., S. Diederich, A. Richter, and P. Scifleet, "Tweet Talking-Exploring The Nature Of Microblogging at Capgemini Yammer," Business Information Systems Working Paper Series, The University of Sydney, (2011).
  32. Seol, H., "Knowledge Management Strategy and Task Characteristics: the department level in the financial institute," The Journal of Woman & Management, Vol.2, No.1(2009), 67-87.
  33. Swan, J., S. Newell, and M. Robertson, "limits of IT-driven knowledge management initiatives for interactive innovation processes," Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, (2000).
  34. Von Krogh, G., "Care in Knowledge Creation," California Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 3(1998), 133-153. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165947
  35. Zhang, J., Y. Qu, J. Cody, and Y. Wu, "A case study of micro-blogging in the enterprise: use, value, and related issues," Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, (2010), 123-132.
  36. Zhao, D., M. B. Rosson, T. Matthews, and T. Moran, "Microblogging's impact on collaboration awareness: A field study of microblogging within and between project teams," Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems, IEEE, (2011), 31-39.

피인용 문헌

  1. The Conceptual Study of Knowledge Adoption based on Resource and Institutionalization Theory for Organizational Knowledge Creation Applied to Knowledge Management Systems vol.35, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.29214/damis.2016.35.2.008