DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Guided bone regeneration using 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC)-cross-linked type-I collagen membrane with biphasic calcium phosphate at rabbit calvarial defects

  • Park, Jin-Young (Department of periodontology, Research institute of periodontal regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jung, Im-Hee (Department of Dental hygiene, College of Health Sciences, Eulji University) ;
  • Kim, You-Kyoung (Department of periodontology, Research institute of periodontal regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Lim, Hyun-Chang (Department of periodontology, Research institute of periodontal regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Seok (Department of periodontology, Research institute of periodontal regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of periodontology, Research institute of periodontal regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of periodontology, Research institute of periodontal regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
  • 투고 : 2015.05.01
  • 심사 : 2015.06.15
  • 발행 : 2015.09.30

초록

Background: In-vitro and animal studies using EDC cross-linked membranes have shown great resistance to enzymatic digestion as well as low cytotoxicity, and indicated its potential expediency as a barrier membrane for guided bone regeneration (GBR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, biocompatibility and degradation kinetics of a novel 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC)-cross-linked type I collagen membrane for regeneration of rabbit calvarial defects. EDC cross-linked type I collagen membrane and macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate (MBCP) consisting of 60 % hydroxyapatite and 40 % ${\beta}$-tricalcium phosphate were used in this study. Four circular defects ($\phi$ = 8 mm) were created in each calvarium of 12 male white rabbits. The experimental groups randomly allocated to the defects were as follows - (1) sham control, (2) EDC-cross-linked collagen membrane (EDC membrane), (3) bone graft (BG), and (4) bone graft with collagen membrane (B-EDC membrane). Specimens were harvested at 2 weeks (n=6) and 8 weeks (n = 6) postoperatively for observational histology and histometrical analysis. Result: The histologic observation showed close adaptation of the EDC membrane to the defect perimeters along with vascularization of the membrane at 2 weeks. Direct apposition of new bone on to the collagen matrix could be observed displaying adequate tissue integration. Collapsing of the central portion of the membrane could be seen in the EDC membrane group, and both BG and B-EDC membrane groups showed greater total augmented area and new bone area than the EDC membrane group. The membrane was largely unresorbed at 2 weeks; and at 8 weeks the overall shape of the membrane was still maintained suggesting sustained barrier function at 8 weeks. Conclusion: Within the limits of this study, it may be concluded that EDC-cross-linked collagen membrane is a safe biomaterial with adequate tissue integration and resorption kinetics to support bone regeneration when used in conjunction with bone filler.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : Yonsei University College

참고문헌

  1. Hammerle CH, Jung RE. Bone augmentation by means of barrier membranes. Periodontol. 2003;33:36-53. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0906-6713.2003.03304.x
  2. Bornstein MM, Bosshardt D, Buser D. Effect of two different bioabsorbable collagen membranes on guided bone regeneration: a comparative histomorphometric study in the dog mandible. J Periodontol. 2007;78:1943-53. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.070102
  3. Hammerle CH, Schmid J, Olah AJ, Lang NP. Osseous healing of experimentally created defects in the calvaria of rabbits using guided bone regeneration. A pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992;3:144-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030307.x
  4. Zubery Y, Goldlust A, Alves A, Nir E. Ossification of a novel cross-linked porcine collagen barrier in guided bone regeneration in dogs. J Periodontol. 2007;78:112-21. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060055
  5. Retzepi M, Donos N. Guided bone regeneration: biological principle and therapeutic applications. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:567-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01922.x
  6. Park JH, Park CK, Kim ES, Park SY, Jo CM, Tak WY, et al. [The diagnostic value of serum hyaluronic acid, 7S domain of type IV collagen and AST/ALT ratio as markers of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B and cirrhosis patients]. Taehan Kan Hakhoe chi =. Korean J Hepatol. 2003;9:79-88.
  7. Gentile P, Chiono V, Tonda-Turo C, Ferreira AM, Ciardelli G. Polymeric membranes for guided bone regeneration. Biotechnol J. 2011;6:1187-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201100294
  8. Postlethwaite AE, Seyer JM, Kang AH. Chemotactic attraction of human fibroblasts to type I, II, and III collagens and collagen-derived peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978;75:871-5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.75.2.871
  9. Mundell RD, Mooney MP, Siegel MI, Losken A. Osseous guided tissue regeneration using a collagen barrier membrane. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;51:1004-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80045-X
  10. Ivanovski S, Hamlet S, Retzepi M, Wall I, Donos N. Transcriptional profiling of "guided bone regeneration" in a critical-size calvarial defect. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:382-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02104.x
  11. Tal H, Kozlovsky A, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE, Moses O. Cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen barrier membranes disintegrate following surgical exposure to the oral environment: a histological study in the cat. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:760-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01546.x
  12. Friedmann A, Gissel K, Soudan M, Kleber BM, Pitaru S, Dietrich T. Randomized controlled trial on lateral augmentation using two collagen membranes: morphometric results on mineralized tissue compound. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:677-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01738.x
  13. al-Arrayed F, Adam S, Moran J, Dowell P. Clinical trial of cross-linked human type I collagen as a barrier material in surgical periodontal treatment. J Clin Periodontol. 1995;22:371-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1995.tb00163.x
  14. Tal H, Kozlovsky A, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE, Moses O. Long-term biodegradation of cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen barriers in human guided bone regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:295-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01424.x
  15. Lekholm U, Becker W, Dahlin C, Becker B, Donath K, Morrison E. The role of early versus late removal of GTAM membranes on bone formation at oral implants placed into immediate extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1993;4:121-9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1993.040302.x
  16. Becker W, Dahlin C, Becker BE, Lekholm U, van Steenberghe D, Higuchi K, et al. The use of e-PTFE barrier membranes for bone promotion around titanium implants placed into extraction sockets: a prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:31-40.
  17. Tal H. [Healing of osseous defects by guided bone regeneration using ribose cross linked collagen membranes]. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim. 2004;21:32-41. 93.
  18. Zahedi S, Legrand R, Brunel G, Albert A, Dewe W, Coumans B, et al. Evaluation of a diphenylphosphorylazide-crosslinked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration in mandibular defects in rats. J Periodontol. 1998;69:1238-46. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.11.1238
  19. Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Sager M, Herten M, Sculean A, Becker J. Biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen membranes: an experimental study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:369-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01108.x
  20. Zubery Y, Nir E, Goldlust A. Ossification of a collagen membrane cross-linked by sugar: a human case series. J Periodontol. 2008;79:1101-7. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070421
  21. Park SN, Kim JK, Suh H. Evaluation of antibiotic-loaded collagen-hyaluronic acid matrix as a skin substitute. Biomaterials. 2004;25:3689-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.072
  22. Park SN, Park JC, Kim HO, Song MJ, Suh H. Characterization of porous collagen/hyaluronic acid scaffold modified by 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide cross-linking. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1205-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00235-6
  23. Eun-Ung Lee CY, Ji-Wan H, Otgonbayar U, Eun-Joo J, Jung-Seok L, Ui-Won J, et al. Early healing processes in guided bone regeneration using cross-linked type-I collagen membrane at rabbit calvarial defect. Biomaterials Res. 2012;16(3):122-8.
  24. Schmid J, Hammerle CH, Fluckiger L, Winkler JR, Olah AJ, Gogolewski S, et al. Blood-filled spaces with and without filler materials in guided bone regeneration. A comparative experimental study in the rabbit using bioresorbable membranes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:75-81. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080201.x
  25. Mooney MP, Mundell RD, Stetzer K, Ochs MW, Milch EA, Buckley MJ, et al. The effects of guided tissue regeneration and fixation technique on osseous wound healing in rabbit zygomatic arch osteotomies. J Craniofac Surg. 1996;7:46-53. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-199601000-00011
  26. Sohn JY, Park JC, Um YJ, Jung UW, Kim CS, Cho KS, et al. Spontaneous healing capacity of rabbit cranial defects of various sizes. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2010;40:180-7. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2010.40.4.180
  27. Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Sculean A, Herten M, Scherbaum W, Becker J. Biocompatibility of various collagen membranes in cultures of human PDL fibroblasts and human osteoblast-like cells. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:443-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01039.x
  28. Rothamel D, Benner M, Fienitz T, Happe A, Kreppel M, Nickenig HJ, et al. Biodegradation pattern and tissue integration of native and cross-linked porcine collagen soft tissue augmentation matrices-an experimental study in the rat. Head Face Med. 2014;10:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-10
  29. Sela MN, Babitski E, Steinberg D, Kohavi D, Rosen G. Degradation of collagen-guided tissue regeneration membranes by proteolytic enzymes of Porphyromonas gingivalis and its inhibition by antibacterial agents. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:496-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01678.x
  30. Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Herten M, Wustefeld M, Sager M, Ferrari D, et al. Immunohistochemical characterization of guided bone regeneration at a dehiscence-type defect using different barrier membranes: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:402-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01486.x
  31. Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Herten M, Sager M, Becker J. Angiogenesis pattern of native and cross-linked collagen membranes: an immunohistochemical study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:403-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01225.x
  32. Oh TJ, Meraw SJ, Lee EJ, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:80-90. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140111.x
  33. Zellin G, Gritli-Linde A, Linde A. Healing of mandibular defects with different biodegradable and non-biodegradable membranes: an experimental study in rats. Biomaterials. 1995;16:601-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(95)93857-A
  34. Luepke PG, Mellonig JT, Brunsvold MA. A clinical evaluation of a bioresorbable barrier with and without decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of molar furcations. J Clin Periodontol. 1997;24:440-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb00209.x
  35. von Arx T, Hafliger J, Chappuis V. Neurosensory disturbances following bone harvesting in the symphysis: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:432-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01138.x
  36. Schenk RK, Buser D, Hardwick WR, Dahlin C. Healing pattern of bone regeneration in membrane-protected defects: a histologic study in the canine mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:13-29.

피인용 문헌

  1. Biomimetically Ornamented Rapid Prototyping Fabrication of an Apatite–Collagen–Polycaprolactone Composite Construct with Nano–Micro–Macro Hierarchical Structure for Large Bone vol.7, pp.47, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b08534
  2. Influence of EDC on Dentin-Resin Shear Bond Strength and Demineralized Dentin Thermal Properties vol.9, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9110920
  3. ‘Reliability of new poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) membranes treated with oxygen plasma plus silicon dioxide layers for pre-prosthetic guided bone regeneration processes’ vol.22, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21512
  4. Dehydrothermally Cross-Linked Collagen Membrane with a Bone Graft Improves Bone Regeneration in a Rat Calvarial Defect Model vol.10, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10080927
  5. Physiochemical properties and resorption progress of porcine skin-derived collagen membranes: In vitro and in vivo analysis vol.37, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-065
  6. Biomimetic characteristics of mussel adhesive protein-loaded collagen membrane in guided bone regeneration of rabbit calvarial defects vol.48, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2018.48.5.305
  7. Improvement of the Physical Properties of Guided Bone Regeneration Membrane from Porcine Pericardium by Polyphenols-Rich Pomace Extract vol.12, pp.16, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12162564
  8. Decellularization, cross-linking and heparin immobilization of porcine carotid arteries for tissue engineering vascular grafts vol.20, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-019-09792-5
  9. Distinctive bone regeneration of calvarial defects using biphasic calcium phosphate supplemented ultraviolet-crosslinked collagen membrane vol.50, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2020.50.1.14
  10. Glucosamine/collagen assembled biomimetic nanofibrous mats via LBL deposition for cartilage engineering vol.540, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148335
  11. Diverse patterns of bone regeneration in rabbit calvarial defects depending on the type of collagen membrane vol.51, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2004180209
  12. 3D-Printed Barrier Membrane Using Mixture of Polycaprolactone and Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate for Regeneration of Rabbit Calvarial Defects vol.14, pp.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123280
  13. Osteogenic Peptides and Attachment Methods Determine Tissue Regeneration in Modified Bone Graft Substitutes vol.12, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb12020022
  14. Degradation Properties of a Bi-layered Cross-linked Collagen Membrane for Localized Bone Regeneration: In Vitro and In Vivo Study vol.14, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5856/jkds.2021.14.1.12
  15. Application of Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) Modified 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropylcarbodiimide hydrochloride/N-hydroxy-succinimide (EDC/NHS) Cross-Linked Collagen Membrane to Promote Macrophag vol.14, pp.16, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164660
  16. Finding the Perfect Membrane: Current Knowledge on Barrier Membranes in Regenerative Procedures: A Descriptive Review vol.12, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031042