DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

보행자도로 서비스 수준 분석방법 개선 연구

A Study on Enhancement Methods of Level of Service Analysis for Pedestrian Sidewalks

  • 김응철 (인천대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 최은진 (인천대학교 공학기술연구소) ;
  • 양주영 (인천대학교 건설환경공학과)
  • Kim, Eungcheol (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Incheon National University) ;
  • Choi, Eun Jin (Research Institute of Engineering and Technology, Incheon National University) ;
  • Yang, Joo Young (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Incheon National University)
  • 투고 : 2014.09.17
  • 심사 : 2014.12.08
  • 발행 : 2015.02.28

초록

현재 보행자도로의 LOS분석 방법은 한국도로용량편람(2013)의 보행자시설편에서 제공하고 있다. 그러나 용량편람에서 제시하는 보행자도로의 분석방법을 적용하여 LOS를 산출할 경우, 분석지점의 대부분이 A수준으로 산출되어 현실적인 보행자도로의 서비스 수준을 반영하지 못하고 있는 실정이다. 이에 본 연구는, 2009년 조사된 '서울시 유동인구조사' 자료를 바탕으로 현재 도로용량편람에서 제시하는 보행자도로의 MOE를 적용하여 LOS기준의 적정성과 문제점을 파악하고, 보다 개선되어진 LOS기준을 제시하고자 하였다. 이의 개선방안으로 본 연구에서는 표준인체치수의 최신화, 보행점유공간의 여유폭 고려, Fruin과 Hall의 연구에서 제시하는 LOS의 정성적인 정의를 활용하여 새로운 기준을 제시하였다. 새로운 기준의 적용결과 종전의 보행자도로 LOS판단 기준보다 합리적인 결과를 보였으며, 본 연구 결과를 바탕으로 추후 보행자도로에 관한 현실적이고 다양한 계획 설계 시공이 가능할 것으로 판단된다.

Currently, level of service(LOS) analysis methods for pedestrian sidewalks are provided in Korean Highway Capacity Manual(KHCM, 2013). However, conventional methods provided in the KHCM produce most of pedestrian sidewalks' LOS as level A, indicating that existing analysis methods are unable to reflect realistic pedestrian sidewalks' LOS. The objectives of this research are to identify the suitability of current LOS criteria and to propose improved LOS evaluation criteria and methods with pedestrian volume data carried out for 10,000 sites in 2009. This research proposes new criteria by using the qualitative definition of LOS proposed by Fruin and Hall, new standard Korean human scale and new criteria of pedestrian occupancy space. Application results of new criteria show that more realistic results can be achieved than the existing methods. It is expected that applying the newly developed criteria and methods can make planning, design and construction of pedestrian sidewalks more realistic and various.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Fruin J. J. (1991), Pedestrian Planning and Design, Metropolitan Association of Urban Designers and Environment(New York, USA), 21-76.
  2. Hall E. T. (1966), The Hidden Dimension, Garden City(New York, USA).
  3. Ji O. S., Koo Y. S., (2008), A Study on Satisfaction for Pedestrian Environment, Gyeonggi Research Institute.
  4. Kim J. H., Oh Y. T., Son Y. T., Park W. S. (2002), A Study on Estimating Level-of-Service for Pedestrian Facilities, J. Korean Soc. Transp, 20(1), Korean Society of Transportation, 149-156.
  5. Kim S. H., Kim K. J., Choi K. J. (2006), Research on LOS Estimation Standard in the Mixed Traffic Street, J. Korean Soc. Transp, 24(3), Korean Society of Transportation, 63-71.
  6. Kim S. M. (2012), The Study on the Level of Service Standard Evaluation With the Walkway Through the Pedestrian Conflicting Analysis, The University of Seoul.
  7. Kim Y. S., Choi J. S. (2007), Evaluation of Sidewalk Level of Service Considering Land Use Patterns, J. Korean Soc. Transp, 25(2), Korean Society of Transportation, 83-93.
  8. Lee S. H. (2012), Improvement of Analysis Method for Pedestrian LOS on Sidewalk in Seoul, J. Korean Soc. Transp, 30(3), Korean Society of Transportation, 7-15. https://doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2012.30.3.007
  9. Lim J. S., Oh Y. T. (2002), Estimation of Pedestrian Capacity for Walkway, J. Korean Soc. Transp, 20(1), Korean Society of Transportation, 91-99.
  10. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2013), Korea Highway Capacity Manual, 612-626.
  11. Park Y. C. (2002), The Measurement of Pedestrian Speed, Density, and Travel Volume, Journal of the Institute for Engineering and Technology Jeonju University, 8(1), 189-197.
  12. Seoul Metropolitan Government (2010), Survey of Movement of Pedestrian in Seoul.
  13. Size Korea (2010), 6th Size Korea Anthropometric Report.
  14. Transportation Research Board (2010), Highway Capacity Manual, TRB, Ch4, Ch23.

피인용 문헌

  1. Determination of Key Factors for the Pedestrian LOS Introducing the Accessibility Index vol.33, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2015.33.6.584
  2. A Study on Level of Service of Sidewalk and Satisfaction of Pedestrian vol.15, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12815/kits.2016.15.3.129
  3. Development of Criteria for Determining Level of Service for Pedestrian Walkway Considering a Pedestrian Platoon: Focusing on the Hongik University Area vol.34, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2016.34.2.191