한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제35권1호
  • /
  • Pages.109-119
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

개방적 상황에서 과학적 문제 만들기 활동이 예비교사의 과학적 문제발견능력에 미치는 영향

Effects of Open-Situation Scientific Problem-Making Activity on the Scientific Problem-Finding Ability of Pre-Service Teachers

  • 투고 : 2014.11.25
  • 심사 : 2015.01.13
  • 발행 : 2015.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 개방적 상황에서 과학적 문제 만들기 활동을 통해 예비교사들의 과학적 문제발견능력이 어떻게 향상되는지를 보았다. 이를 위해 과학교육학부 1학년 세 반을 훈련에 참여한 정도를 기준으로 적극적으로 참여한 반을 실험집단 1로, 비적극적으로 참여한 반을 실험집단 2로, 참여하지 않은 집단을 통제집단으로 편성하였다. 문제 만들기 훈련을 위해 활동지를 제작하여 예비교사들에게 적용하였는데, 예비교사들은 7주간 한 주에 하나의 궁금증을 찾아 활동지를 작성하였고,연구자와 교수가 매주 피드백 해주었다. 또한 문제 만들기 훈련이 문제 발견능력에 주는 영향을 보기 위해 개방적 상황에서의 문제발견 검사지를 개발하여 훈련 전후 문제발견능력을 측정하였다. 훈련 간 문제 만들기 활동지의 지속적인 작성과 피드백을 통해 예비교사들이 발견하는 문제의 수준이 높아지고 다양해졌으며, 검사결과 발견한 문제의 양과 질에서 실험 집단 1이 다른 집단에 비해 유의미한 향상을 보였다. 특히 질적 검사 항목 중 독창성, 정교성, 검증 가능성, 변인의 유형에서 유의미한 차이를 보였다. 또한 실험 집단 2는 부정적인 결과를 보였는데, 이것으로 보아 훈련에 임하는 태도가 문제발견능력의 향상과 상관이 있다고 짐작할 수 있다. 전체적인 결과로 보아 지속적인 문제 만들기 훈련과 피드백은 예비교사들의 문제발견능력 향상에 도움이 된다고 할 수 있다.

In this study, we investigated how the scientific problem-finding ability of pre-service teachers is improved through open-situation scientific problem-making activity. We organized two experimental groups and a control group by degree of participation. The 1st experimental group is an actively participating class, while the 2nd experimental group is a passively participating class. We developed and applied a worksheet for training in problem-making. The pre-service teachers filled in the worksheet for problem-making once a week for seven weeks, then the lecturer gave feedback for every worksheet. We developed and applied a problem finding test in an open-situation to measure their problem finding ability at pre- and post-training. As a result of the training, problem level and diversity improved for pre-service teachers through continuous problem-making activities and feedback. The 1st experiment group significantly improved on the quality and quantity of problems. Especially in the originality, elaboration, verifiability, and variables' category, the 1st experimental group significantly improved compared to the control group and the 2nd experimental group. On the other hand, the quality and quantity of problems of the 2nd experimental group decreased. These results provide a basis for correlation between training attitude and improvement of problem-finding ability. Based on the result of this study, continuous problem-making training and feedbacks are helpful in improving the problem-finding ability of pre-service teachers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brugman, G. B. (1995). The discovery and formulation of problems. European Education, 27(1), 38-57. https://doi.org/10.2753/EUE1056-4934270138
  2. Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluation inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10001
  3. Choi, O. (2007). The patterns, contents and backgrounds of experience of scientific questions generated by elementary school students in daily life (Master's thesis). Kongju National University, Gongju.
  4. Dillon, J. T. (1982). Problem finding and solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 16(2), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1982.tb00326.x
  5. Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: John Wiley.
  6. Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1995). Investigative work in the science curriculum. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  7. Hah, J. (2003). A Study of the Relations among Problem Finding, Creative Thinking and Creative Personality. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 17(3), 99-115.
  8. Hoover, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1990). The scientific hypothesis formulation ability of gifted ninth-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 838-848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.838
  9. Hwang, Y., & Park, J. (2010). Development and application of CNP model for the enhancing creativity of scientifically gifted students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 20(3), 847-866.
  10. Jeong, J., & Kim, H. (2013). An analysis of the science inquiry problem finding processes of elementary science gifted and general students. Journal of educational studies, 44(1), 123-145.
  11. Jeong, S., Choi, H., & Yang, I. (2011). Analysis on the complexity of scientific reasoning during pre-service elementary school teachers' openinquiry activities. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(3), 379-393.
  12. Jeoung, J. (1996). Measurement on science process skills of elementary upper graders using 3-dimensional assessment framework (Master's thesis). Korea National University of Education, Cheongju.
  13. Jung, H., Cho, S., Seo, H., Shin, M., & Heo, N. (2004). The exploratory study on the self-directed research ability of the gifted. A study on consignment CR2003-43. Seoul: Korea Educational Development Institute.
  14. Kim, J. (2000). Case analysis on the process of middle school students' setting scientific inquiry problems (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul.
  15. Kim, J. (2006). How to guide problem set-up in science inquiry for middle school students?. Paju: Korean Studies Information Co.
  16. Kwak, Y. (1999). The effects of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) on Korean elementary school students' attitude towards science and their ability to pursue the subject (Master's thesis). Cheonnam National University, Gwangju.
  17. Kwon, Y., Choi, S. Park, Y., & Jeong, J. (2003). Scientific thinking types and processes generated in inductive inquiry by college students. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 23(3), 286-298.
  18. Lee, H. (2005). An analysis on the relative contributions of variables to problem finding in ill and moderately structured problem situations. The Journal of Elementary Education, 18(2), 123-148.
  19. Lee, H. (2006). Gender differences in the factors affecting elementary school students' ability to identify scientific problems. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(4), 419-429.
  20. Lee, H., Jeong, J., Park, K., & Kwon, Y. (2004). Types of scientific questions generated in observational activity by elementary students and preservice teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 24(5), 1018-1027.
  21. Lee, H., Park, K., & Kwon, Y. (2005). Type of thinking and generating processes of causal questions appeared in preservice elementary teachers' observation activity. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 24(3), 249-258.
  22. MEST (Ministry of Education and Science Technology) (2011). Proclamation of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology: #2011-361 [separate volume 9] Science Curriculum. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korea.
  23. Noh, K., & Kim, H. (1996). Elementary school children's conceptions about dissolution according to scientific and everyday context. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 15(2), 233-250.
  24. Runco, M. A. (1994). Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. Norwood, NJ : Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  25. Ryu, S. (2008). Analysis of problem-finding activity and the relationship between problem finding and problem solving of the scientificallygifted (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Kyungpook National University, Daegu.
  26. Ryu, S., & Park, J. (2008a). Development of an instrument to measure scientific problem-finding ability for scientifically-gifted student. Journal of Korea Association for Science Education, 28(2), 139-149.
  27. Ryu, S., & Park, J. (2008b). Relationship between problem finding ability and problem solving ability in chemistry. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 52(2), 179-185. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2008.52.2.179
  28. Shin, H., & Kim, H. (2010). Analysis of elementary teachers' and students' views about difficulties on open science inquiry activities. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(3), 262-276.
  29. Song, J. (1997). Review and analysis of the studies on contexts in science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 17(3), 273-288.
  30. Starko, A. J. (2000). Finding the problem finders: Problem finding and the identification and development of talent. In R. C. Friedman & B. M. Shore(Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  31. Yun, K. (2004). Differences in problem finding between the scientifically gifted and the average students, and the analysis of variables effecting problem finding (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pusan National University, Busan.

피인용 문헌

  1. 대학생들의 융합형 문제 해결 활동에서 문제발견 및 과학기술 분야 활용 양상 분석 vol.36, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.6.0867
  2. 과학탐구 수업실행 전문성 요소에 의한 '과학탐구' 관련 연구동향 분석 vol.61, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2017.61.4.197
  3. 고등학교 과제 연구 수업에서 탐구 문제 도출 과정 탐색 vol.38, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.3.319