Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Characteristics of Pre-Service Secondary Science Teachers' Curriculum Design for Teaching in Science Museum

과학관 활용 수업을 위한 중등 예비과학교사의 교수 설계에서 나타나는 특징

  • Received : 2015.01.14
  • Accepted : 2015.02.18
  • Published : 2015.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this case study, we investigated the characteristics of pre-service secondary science teachers' curriculum design for teaching in science museums. Three pre-service secondary science teachers at a college of education in Seoul participated in this study. We have observed and recorded their teaching practices in science museums, collected all of their teaching materials, and conducted semi-structured interviews before and after teaching. All the data collected were analyzed by using the constant comparative method. The analyses of results revealed that the pre-service teachers structured their teaching in a series of pre-visit, during-visit, and post-visit as continuous activities. They attempted to reinforce students' learning experiences during the visit by providing post-visit activities, and also properly considered the principle that activity should be personally meaningful or relevant to students. However, they lacked the perceptions as well as the practical knowledge of reducing student's novelty of the science museum by providing activities prior to the visit, encouraging to engage in joint productive activities, promoting diverse social interactions, and providing students with choices and controls on their learning. On the bases of these results, we made some suggestions in pre-service teacher education for the professional development of teaching in science museum.

이 연구에서는 사례연구를 통해 과학관 활용 수업을 위한 중등 예비 과학교사의 교수 설계에서 나타나는 특징을 분석하였다. 서울 소재 사범대학의 예비과학교사 3명이 연구에 참여하였으며, 국립과천과학관을 활용한 수업을 계획 및 실행하였다. 예비교사들이 제작한 모든 교수학습 자료를 수집하였고, 수업을 관찰하면서 수업 장면을 촬영 및 녹음하였으며, 교수 실행 전후에 반구조화된 면담을 실시하였다. 예비교사의 과학관 활용 수업을 위한 교수 설계의 특징을 분석하기 위해 지속적 비교 방법을 사용하였다. 연구 결과, 예비교사들은 과학관 수업을 서로 연계된 방문 전, 중, 후 활동으로 구성하였고, 방문 후 활동을 통해 방문 중 학습을 강화시키려 시도하였으며, 과학관 학습을 학생 개인의 경험과 연결시키는 측면을 비교적 적절히 고려하는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 방문 전 활동을 통해 과학관에 대한 낯설음을 감소시키거나, 소집단 활동을 통해 학생들이 공동의 산출물을 만들도록 하거나, 다양한 사회적 상호작용을 촉진시키거나, 학생들이 자신의 학습을 직접 선택하고 조절하도록 하는 것에 대한 인식과 실행 지식은 부족하였다. 이러한 연구 결과를 바탕으로 예비교사의 과학관 학습관련 전문성을 향상시키기 위한 교육 방안을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Allen, S. (2002). Looking for learning in visitor talk: A methodological exploration. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 259-303). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  2. Anderson, D., Kisiel, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2006). Understanding teachers' perspectives on field trips: Discovering common ground in three countries. Curator: The Museum Journal, 49(3), 365-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2006.tb00229.x
  3. Anderson, D., Lucas, K. B., & Ginn, I. S. (2003). Theoretical perspectives on learning in an informal setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 177-199. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10071
  4. Anderson, D., Lucas, K. B., Ginns, I. S., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Development of knowledge about electricity and magnetism during a visit to a science museum and related post-visit activities. Science Education, 84(5), 658-679. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200009)84:5<658::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-A
  5. Bamberger, Y., & Tal, T. (2008). Multiple outcomes of class visits to natural history museums: The students' view. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(3), 274-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9097-3
  6. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
  7. Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373-1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500498419
  8. Chang, H., & Lee, H. (2007). Secondary school science teachers' perception on the use of educational programs in science museum on their science teaching. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 27(8), 755-764.
  9. Chang, H., & Lee, H. (2008). Discourse analysis of pre-service science teachers and students in science museums and its implication for teacher education. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 27(3), 211-220.
  10. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  11. Cox-Petersen, A. M., Marsh, D. D., Kisiel., J., & Melber, L. M. (2003). Investigation of guided school tours, student learning, and science reform: Recommendations at a museum of natural history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 200-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10072
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Hermanson, K. (1995). Intrinsic motivation in museums: Why does one want to learn? In J. H. Falk, & L. Dierking (Eds.), Public institutions for personal learning (pp. 67-77). Washington, D.C.: AAM.
  13. Davidson, S., Passmore, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Learning on zoo field trips: The interaction of the agendas and practices of students, teachers, and zoo educators. Science Education, 94(1), 122-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20356
  14. DeWitt, J., & Hohenstein, J. (2010). School trips and classroom lessons: An investigation into teacher-student talk in two settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 454-473. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20346
  15. DeWitt, J., & Osborne, J. (2007). Supporting teachers on science focused school trips: Towards an integrated framework of theory and practice. International Journal of Science Education, 29(6), 685-710. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600802254
  16. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
  17. Griffin, J. (2004). Research on students and museums: Looking more closely at the student in school groups. Science Education, 88(Supplement 1), S59-S70. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20018
  18. Griffin, J., & Symington, D. (1997). Moving from task-oriented to learning-oriented strategies on school excursions to museums. Science Education, 81(6), 763-779. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199711)81:6<763::AID-SCE11>3.0.CO;2-O
  19. Guisasola, J., Solbes, J., Barragues, J., Morentin, M., & Moreno, A. (2009). Students' understanding of the special theory of relativity and design for a guided visit to a science museum. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 2085-2104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802353536
  20. Guy, M., & Kelley-Lowe, M. (2001). Preservice elementary teachers' perceptions of a teaching partnership with a museum. Paper presented at the national association of research in science teaching annual meeting. St. Louis, MO.
  21. Han, M., Yang, C., & Noh, T. (2010). Perceptions and educational needs of teachers for instructions for using the science museum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(8), 1060-1074.
  22. Han, M., Yang, C., & Noh, T. (2014). An analysis of teaching strategies of science teacher's teaching in science museum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(6), 559-569. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.6.0559
  23. Kim, Y., Lee, S. H., Sohn, J., Kim, J. B., & Kweon, H. (2010). The study for the improvement of the informal science education program of the gwachon national science museum based on the participant satisfaction. Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 279-290.
  24. Kim, J., Oh, Y., & Choi, K. (2012). Analysis of perceptions between pre-service science teachers and pre-service science museum staff on the role of and education in science museums. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 12(4), 261-280.
  25. Kim, C. -J., Shin, M. -K., & Lee, S. -K. (2010). Understanding informal science learning. Seoul: Bookshill.
  26. Kisiel, J. F. (2007). Examining teacher choices for science museum worksheets. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(1), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9023-6
  27. Mortensen, M. F., & Smart, K. (2007). Free-choice worksheets increase students' exposure to curriculum during museum visits. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1389-1414. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20206
  28. Noel, A. (2007). Elements of a winning field trip. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 44(1), 42-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2007.10516491
  29. Olson, J. K., Cox-Petersen, A. M., & McComas, W. F. (2001). The inclusion of informal environments in science teacher preparation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016715127697
  30. Orion, N (1993). A model for the development and implementation of field trips as an integral part of the science curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 93(6), 325-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1993.tb12254.x
  31. Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1097-1119. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660311005
  32. Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. Shrewsbury, UK: National Foundation of Educational Research and King's College London.
  33. Sacco, J. C. (1999). Crafting exhibit experiences for school audiences. Paper presented at the American association of museums 94th annual meeting, Cleveland.
  34. Song, J. W., Kim, C. -J., Kim, H. -B., Yoo, J., Lee, K. H., & Chae, H. K. (2009). The study book for inquiry learning of primary, middle, and high school connected with exhibits of the gwachon national science museum. Gyeonggi: The Gwachon National Science Museum.
  35. Tal, R. T. (2001). Incorporating field trips as science learning environment enrichment: An interpretive study. Learning Environment Research, 4(1), 25-49. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011454625413
  36. Tal, R., Bamberger, Y., & Morag, O. (2005). Guided school visits to natural history museums in Israel: Teachers' roles. Science Education, 89(6), 920-935. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20070
  37. Wray, D., & Lewis, M. (1997). Extending literacy: Children reading and writing non-fiction. London: Routledge.
  38. Yang, C., Bae, Y., Kim, C. -J., Choe, S. -U., Kim, H. -B., Yoo, J.,... Noh, T. (2013). An investigation of science-related activities perceived by elementary school students. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(4), 515-526.
  39. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and method (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cited by

  1. 과학관 활용 수업을 위한 교육 프로그램에 참여한 예비화학교사의 교수 설계에서 나타나는 특징 vol.61, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2017.61.6.388
  2. 예비 화학교사들의 실천적 지식(PPK) 함양을 위한 사례연구 -실행공동체(CoP) 활동의 반성적 논의를 중심으로- vol.37, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.2.0347
  3. Exploring the Design Characteristics of Secondary Pre-Service Teachers Derived from Instructional Design Education in Teacher Training Institutions vol.29, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2017.29.2.285