References
- Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom: building cooperation in the classroom (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
- Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis: University of Pennsylvania press.
- Bevilacqua, F., & Giannetto, E. (1995). Hermeneutics and Science Education: The role of history of science. Science & Education, 4(2), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00486579
- Boudourides, M. A. (1998). Constructivism and education: A shopper's guide. Paper presented at the International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics, Samos, Greece.
- Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress: Oxford University Press.
- Cheong, E. (2006). Gadamer truth and method 2. A Journal of Philosophical Ideas, An extra number 7(20), 1-169.
- Cho, H., & Choi, K. (2002). Science Education: Constructivist Perspectives. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(4), 820-836.
- Choi, M. (2005). Hermeneutics and Education : Research of sociology of curriculum. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
- Choi, S. (2009). A Hermeneutical Understanding of Moral Education. Journal of the Elementary Moral Instruction, 30, 112-138.
- Clement, J., Brown, D. E., & Zietsman, A. (1989). Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: finding 'anchoring conceptions' for grounding instruction on students' intuitions. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 554-565. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110507
- diSessa, A. A. (2002). Why "conceptual ecology" is a good idea Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 28-60): Springer.
- Driver, R. (1981). Pupils' alternative frameworks in science. European Journal of Science Education, 3(1), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528810030109
- Driver, R. (1983). Pupil as scientist: McGraw-Hill International.
- Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023002005
- Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development in Science. Studies in Science Education, 13(1), 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268608559933
- Eger, M. (1992). Hermeneutics and science education: An introduction. Science & Education, 1(4), 337-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00430961
- Eger, M. (1997). Achievements of the hermeneutic-phenomenological approach to natural science: A comparison with constructivist sociology. Man and World, 30(3), 343-367. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004215804045
- Gadamer, H. G. (1975). Truth and method (2nd ed.). New York: Continuum.
- Grondin, J. (1991). Einfuhrung in die philosophische Hermeneutik: Cambridge Univ Press.
- Ha, S., Lee, G., & Kalman, C. S. (2013a). Workshop on Friction: Understanding and Addressing Students' Difficulties in Learning Science through a Hermeneutical Perspective. Science & Education, 22(6), 1423-1441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9465-5
- Ha, S. (2013b). An Understanding of Students' Group Learning in Upper-level Mechanics Course: Based on a Hermeneutical Perspective. (Doctor's degree), Seoul National University.
- Han, H.-J., Lee, T., Ko, H., Lee, S.-K., Kim, E., Choe, S.-U., & Kim, C.-J. (2012). An Analysis of the Type of Rebuttal in Argumentation among Science-Gifted Student. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(4), 717-728. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.4.717
- Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.
- Heisenberg, W. (1971). Der Teil und das Ganze: Gesprache im Umkreis der Atomphysik. Frankfurt: Buchergilde Gutenberg.
- Huh, H. (1987). Piaget's Ontogenetic Epistemology and Epigenesis, and its' Educational Psychological Implication. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 151-176.
- Hur, S. (1997). Reconceptualization of Educational Phenomenon. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Jung, W.-Y., Lee, G., Shin, H., Cha, H.-J., & Kim, C.-J. (2012). Role Formation by Interaction Function and Pattern for Group Discussion Activity using the case of Environmental Education Camp for Undergraduate Student. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(4), 555-569. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.4.555
- Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative Learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan Cooperative Learning.
- Kalman, C. (2011). Enhancing students' conceptual understanding by engaging science text with reflective writing as a hermeneutical circle. Science & Education, 20(2), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9298-z
- Kang, E., & Kim, J. (2012). Problem-Finding Process and Effect Factor by University Students in an Ill-Structured Problem Situation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(4), 570-585. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.4.570
- Kang, S. (2010). Philosophy vs Philosophy. Seoul: Greenbee.
- Kim, I., Park, Y., Park, J., Song, J., & Choi, K. (2002). A general theory of physics education 2. Seoul: Bookshill.
- Kim, P., Park, S., Sim, S., You, B., Lim, C., Hur, S., & Hwang, H. (2000). Constructivism and curriculum education. Seoul: Hakjisa.
- Kwon, J., & Nam, J. (2013). A Study on the Change of the Beginning Science Teachers' Beliefs About a Lesson and Teaching Practice in Argument-Based Inquiry Using Science Writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(7), 1329-1342. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.7.1329
- Lee, G. (2007). Why Do Students Have Difficulties in Learning Physics?: Toward a Structural Analysis of Student Difficulty Via a Framework of Knowledge & Belief. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 54(4), 284-295.
- Lee, J. (2010). An Inquiry of Elementary Moral Instruction Based on Educational Hermeneutics. Journal of the Elementary Moral Instruction, 32, 255-282.
- Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching : the role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
- Minstrell, J. (1982). Explaining the "at rest" condition of an object. The Physics Teacher, 20(1), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2340924
- Nam, J., Kwak, K., Jang, K., & Hand, B. (2008). The implementation of Argumentation Using Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) in Middle School Science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(8), 922-936.
- Palmer, R. E. (1969). Hermeneutics : interpretation theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
- Park, J.-Y., & Kim, H.-B. (2012). Theoretical Considerations on Analytical Framework Design for the Interactions between Participants in Group Argumentation on Socio-Scientific Issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(4), 604-624. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.4.604
- Park, S. (1993). Hermeneutics. Philosophy & Reality, 17, 123-142.
- Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative Learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315-342. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543050002315
- Son, S. (2001). Educational Hermeneutics. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
- Von Glasersfeld, E. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. The invented reality, 17-40.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press.
- Vygotsky, L. S., Carton, A. S., & Rieber, R. W. (1987). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Volume 1 (Including the Volume Thinking and Speech). New York: Plenum Press.
- Wallace, J., & Louden, W. (2005). Dilemmas of science teaching: Perspectives on problems of practice: Routledge.
- Warnke, G. (1987). Gadamer : hermeneutics, tradition and reason. Cambridge: Polity.
- Yager, R. E. (1991). The constructivist learning model. Science Teacher, 58(6), 52-57.
- Yoon, B. (2007). Das hermeneutische Erbe Heideggers und die "philosophische Hermeneutik" bei Gadamer. Journal of the Ontology Research, 15, 471-502.
- You, J., & Noh, T. (2012). An Analysis of Verbal Interaction among Science-Gifted Students in Inquiry Learning Based on Analogical Experimental Design Strategy Emphasizing Understanding and Checking Stages. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(4), 671-685. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.4.671
Cited by
- 공통맥락 형성의 관점에서 살펴본 마찰력에 대한 소집단 토론의 특징 vol.37, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.2.0301
- 프로그래밍 기반 수업이 과학교사의 TPACK에 대한 인식에 미치는 영향 vol.37, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.4.693
- 구르는 물체에 작용하는 마찰력에 대한 과학 영재학교 학생들의 이해의 특징 vol.42, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2018.42.2.120
- Challenges of designing and carrying out laboratory experiments about Newton's second law : The case of Korean gifted students vol.29, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00155-1