DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect on bone formation of the autogenous tooth graft in the treatment of peri-implant vertical bone defects in the minipigs

  • Kim, Seok Kon (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sae Woong (Department of OMFS, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Kyung Wook (Department of OMFS, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2015.01.09
  • Accepted : 2015.01.09
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of autogenous tooth bone as a graft material for regeneration of bone in vertical bony defects of the minipigs. Material and Methods: Six minipigs were used in this study. Four molars were extracted in the right mandibular dentition and sent to the Korea Tooth Bank for fabrication of autogenous tooth bone. Ten days later, each extraction site was implanted with MS Implant Narrow Ridge $3.0{\times}10mm$ fixture (Osstem, Seoul, Korea) after standardized 2mm-sized artificial vertical bony defect formation. Pineappleshaped Root-On type autogenous tooth bones were applied to the vertical defects around the neck area of the posterior three fixtures and the fore-most one was not applied with autogenous bone as a control group. Each minipig was sacrificed at 4, 8, 12 weeks after fixture installation and examined radiologically and histologically. Histological evaluation was done under light microscope with Villanueva osteochrome bone staining with semi-quantitative histomorphometric study. Percentage of new bone over total area (NBF) and bone to implant contact (BIC) ratio were evaluated using digital software for area calculation. Result: NBF were $48.15{\pm}18.02%$, $45.50{\pm}28.37%$, and $77.13{\pm}15.30%$ in 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively for experimental groups. The control group showed $37.00{\pm}11.53%$, $32.25{\pm}26.99%$, and $1.33{\pm}2.31%$ in 4,8,12 weeks, respectively. BIC ratio were $53.08{\pm}19.82%$, $45.00{\pm}28.37%$, and $75.13{\pm}16.55%$ in 4,8,12 weeks, respectively. Those for the control groups were $38.33{\pm}6.43%$, $33.50{\pm}29.51%$, and $1.33{\pm}2.31%$ in 4, 8, 12 weeks, respectively. Conclusion: Autogenous tooth bone showed higher score than control group in NBF and BIC in all the data encompassing 4,8,12 weeks specimens, but statistically significant only 12 weeks data in both NBF and BIC.

Keywords

References

  1. Hiatt WH, Schallhorn RG (1973) Intraoral transplants of cancellous bone and marrow in periodontal lesions. J Periodontol 44:194-208 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1973.44.4.194
  2. Ellegaard B, Karring T, Davies R, Le H (1974) New attachment after treatment of intrabony defects in monkeys. J Periodontol 45:368-377 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1974.45.5.2.368
  3. Schallhorn RG (1977) Present status of osseous grafting procedures. J Periodontol 48:570-576 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1977.48.9.570
  4. Kim SG, Yeo HH, Kim YK (1999) Grafting of large defects of the jaws with a particulate dentin-plaster of Paris combination. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88:22-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70188-5
  5. Kim SG, Chung CH, Kim YK (2001) Grafting defects using a particulate dentin-plaster of Paris combination for implant placement: a case report. Hosp Dent (Tokyo) 13:127-130
  6. Kim SG, Chung CH, Kim YK, Park JC, Lim SC (2002) The use of particulate dentin-plaster of Paris combination with/without platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of bone defects around implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17:86-94
  7. Hwang YJ, Kim SG, Yoon JH, Lim SC (2004) Effect of bone regeneration of a mixture of human, bovine, pig, rabbit, or dog tooth-ash and plaster of Paris in rats. J Korean Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 26:155-161
  8. Park SS, Kim SG, Lim SC, Ong JL (2008) Osteogenic activity of the mixture of chitosan and particulate dentin. J Biomed Materials Res 87A:618-623 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31812
  9. Kim SG, Kim HK, Lim SC (2001) Combined implantation of particulate dentin, plaster of Paris, and a bone xenograft (Bio-Oss) for bone regeneration in rats. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 29:282-288 https://doi.org/10.1054/jcms.2001.0236
  10. Urist MR (1965) Bone formation by autoinduction. Science 150:893-899 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.150.3698.893
  11. Yeomans JD, Urist MR (1967) Bone induction by decalcified dentin implanted into oral, osseous, and muscle tissues. Arch Oral Biol 12:999-1008 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(67)90095-7
  12. Kim YK, Kim SG, Byeon JH, Lee HJ, Um IU, Lim SC, Kim SY (2010) Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:496-503 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.017
  13. Chung JH, Lee JH (2011) Study of bone healing pattern in extraction socket after application of demineralized dentin matrix material. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:365-374 https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2011.37.5.365
  14. Murata M, Akazawa T, Takahata M, Ito M, Tazaki J, Hino J, Nakamura K, Iwasaki N, Shibata T, Arisue M (2010) J Ceram Soc Jpn 118:434-437 https://doi.org/10.2109/jcersj2.118.434
  15. Jeong HR, Hwang JH, Lee JK (2011) Effectiveness of autogenous tooth bone used as a graft material for regeneration of bone in miniature pig. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:375-379 https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2011.37.5.375
  16. Tomoki N, Junichi W, Akiko E, Tomohiro T, Miki O (2010) A new method for alveolar bone repair using extracted teeth for the graft material. J Periodontol 81:1264-1272 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100016
  17. McKee MD, Aoba T, Moreno EC (1991) Morphology of the enamel organ in the miniature swine. Anat Rec 230:97-113 https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092300110
  18. Carter DR, Beaupre GS, Giori NJ, Helms JA (1998) Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration. Clin Orthop Rel Res 355S:S41-S55 https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199810001-00006
  19. Misch CE. Available bone and dental implant treatment plans. In Misch CE (ed.2) Contemporary implant dentistry. pp178-99, St. louis, Missouri: Mosby Co, 2008

Cited by

  1. Clinical Efficacy of Tooth-Bone Graft : A Systematic Review and Risk of Bias Analysis of Randomized Control Trials and Observational Studies vol.27, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000687
  2. Sandblasted and Acid Etched Titanium Dental Implant Surfaces Systematic Review and Confocal Microscopy Evaluation vol.12, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12111763