Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (수산해양교육연구)

The Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (한국수산해양교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Strategy of Performance Assessment based on Classroom

수업 연계 수행평가 전략 설계 방안 연구

  • Received : 2014.11.03
  • Accepted : 2015.02.02
  • Published : 2015.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to search the concept and meaning of performance assessment(PA) in the classroom, and the to proposed some strategies to apply PA. The result of this study was presented below. First, differentiation strategy is necessary in the evaluation goal. Individualization will be an example of differentiation strategy in the evaluation of group goal. Second, various strategies are needed based on the subjects of evaluation. Self-evaluation, peer-evaluation, and small group-evaluation are some examples evaluation for the subjects. Third, there is a need for phase-strategy assessment. For the class associated performance assessment, we have to consider the evaluation activities based on the time likes before (pre), on, and after class. How to select the evaluation task is also one of the key sucess factors for improving the class associated performance assessment.

Keywords

References

  1. Berk, R. A.(1986). Performance assessment: methods & applications, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  2. Choi, H. S.(1999). Obstructive factor analysis & improvement plan of curriculum & performance assessment, Korean Journal of Educational Research, 38(1), 153-184.
  3. Dewey, J.(1938). Experience and education, NY: Collier Books.
  4. Jonassen, D. H.(1991). Evaluating constructivist learning, Educational Technology, 31(9), 28-33.
  5. Kolb D. A.(1984). Experiential Learning experience as a source of learning and development, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  6. McTighe J. & Ferrara S.(1994). Assessing learning in the classroom, Washington,D.C: National Education Association.
  7. Nam, M. H.(1995). Research on validity of performance assessment, Doctoral Paper in Korea University.
  8. Park, C.(2014). Formative assessment and teacher education, Journal of Educational Evaluation, 27(4), 987-1007.
  9. Park, S. M.(1998). A theoretical and practical linkage between constructivism and performance assessment, Social Studies Education, 31, 339-356.
  10. Phye, G. D.(1997). Handbook of classroom assessment: learning, adjustment, and achievement, CA: Academic Press.
  11. Scriven, M.(1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. Gagne, & M. Scriven(Eds.) Perspectives on Curricular Evaluation, AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation. No.1, pp.39-83. Chicago: Rand McNally.
  12. Seong, T. J. Im, H. J.(2014). Suggestions for teacher's perception and applicable method through the new understanding of formative assessment, Journal of Educational Evaluation, 27(3), 597-615
  13. Stiggins, R. J.(1994). Student-centered classroom assessment, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
  14. Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment FOR learning: A path to success in standards-based schools, Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324-328. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508700414
  15. Won, H. H.(2014). Suggestions for improvement of performance assessment according to achievement evaluation, The Journal of Fisheries and Marine Science Education, 26(1), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2014.26.1.203