DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis on Using the History of Mathematics in Chinese Mathematics Textbooks

중국 수학 교과서의 수학사 활용 분석

  • Chang, Hyewon (Dept. of Math. Education, Seoul National Univ. of Education)
  • Received : 2015.02.03
  • Accepted : 2015.02.25
  • Published : 2015.02.28

Abstract

This study aims to analyze how the history of mathematics is used in Chinese mathematics textbooks. As a framework for analysis, we categorized nine types of using the history of mathematics in textbooks. We analyzed 18 mathematics textbooks for Chinese elementary and middle schools. As a result, we found that various types of using the history of mathematics were adopted in Chinese textbooks except for explorations of mathematical errors in history. We also noticed three characteristics: preference to using for motivation and reading matters in elementary school levels, high frequencies of using problems from traditional mathematical books and origins of mathematical concepts or symbols, and emphasis on ethnic superiority through the Chinese traditional mathematics. Based on the results of analysis, we discussed and induced some implications for using the history in our mathematics textbooks.

Keywords

References

  1. A. Arcavi, Two benefits of using history, For the learning of mathematics 11(2) (1991), 11.
  2. A. Arcavi,M. Bruckheimer, R. Ben-Zvi, Maybe a mathematics teacher can profit from the study of the history of mathematics, For the learning of mathematics (1982), 30-37.
  3. E. Barbin, The reading of original texts: how and why to introduce a historical perspective, For the learning of mathematics 11(2) (1991), 12-13.
  4. Chang H., Seeing Joseon mathematics in the perspective of mathematics education, Mathematics and Education, 2009(7/8), 2009. 장혜원, 수학교육적 관점에서 조선 산학 바라보기, 수학과 교육 2009(7/8), 전국수학교사모임.
  5. Curriculum and Teaching Material Research Institute(CTMRI), Shuxue 1-1, People' s education press, 2012. 과정교재연구소, 수학 1년급 상책, 인민교육출판사, 2012.
  6. CTMRI, Shuxue 1-2, People's education press, 2012. 과정교재연구소, 수학 1년급 하책, 인민교육출판사, 2012.
  7. CTMRI, Shuxue 2-1, People's education press, 2013. 과정교재연구소, 수학 2년급 상책, 인민교육출판사, 2013.
  8. CTMRI, Shuxue 2-2, People's education press, 2013. 과정교재연구소, 수학 2년급 하책, 인민교육출판사, 2013.
  9. CTMRI, Shuxue 3-1, People's education press, 2009. 과정교재연구소. 수학 3년급 상책, 인민교육출판사, 2009.
  10. CTMRI, Shuxue 3-2, People's education press, 2008. 과정교재연구소, 수학 3년급 하책, 인민교육출판사, 2008.
  11. CTMRI, Shuxue 4-1, People's education press, 2004. 과정교재연구소, 수학 4년급 상책, 인민교육출판사, 2004.
  12. CTMRI, Shuxue 4-2, People's education press, 2005. 과정교재연구소, 수학 4년급 하책, 인민교육출판사, 2005.
  13. CTMRI, Shuxue 5-1, People's education press, 2009. 과정교재연구소, 수학 5년급 상책, 인민교육출판사, 2009.
  14. CTMRI, Shuxue 5-2, People's education press, 2006. 과정교재연구소, 수학 5년급 하책, 인민교육출판사, 2006.
  15. CTMRI, Shuxue 6-1, People's education press, 2009. 과정교재연구소, 수학 6년급 상책, 인민교육출판사, 2009.
  16. CTMRI, Shuxue 6-2, People's education press, 2009. 과정교재연구소, 수학 6년급 하책, 인민교육출판사, 2009.
  17. CTMRI, Shuxue 7-1, People's education press, 2007. 과정교재연구소, 수학 7년급 상책, 인민교육출판사, 2007.
  18. CTMRI, Shuxue 7-2, People's education press, 2007. 과정교재연구소, 수학 7년급 하책, 인민교육출판사, 2007.
  19. CTMRI, Shuxue 8-2, People's education press, 2008. 과정교재연구소, 수학 8년급 상책, 인민교육출판사, 2008.
  20. CTMRI, Shuxue 8-2, People's education press, 2008. 과정교재연구소, 수학 8년급 하책, 인민교육출판사, 2008.
  21. CTMRI, Shuxue 9-1, People's education press, 2009. 과정교재연구소, 수학 9년급 상책, 인민교육출판사, 2009.
  22. CTMRI, Shuxue 9-2, People's education press, 2009. 과정교재연구소, 수학 9년급 하책, 인민교육출판사, 2009.
  23. J. Fauvel, Using history in mathematics education, For the learning of mathematics 11(2) (1991), 3-6.
  24. Jeon Y. J., History of mathematics education in China. The Korean Journal for History of Mathematics 24(2) (2011), 91-108. 전영주, 중국의 수학교육사, 한국수학사학회지 24(2) (2011), 91-108.
  25. KERIS, RISS, http://www.riss.kr/index.do.2015.2.3
  26. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, 2012 International trends of curriculum and evaluation: Taiwan, Signapore, Japan, China, KICE, 2012. 한국교육과정평가원. 2012 교육과정.교육평가 국제동향 연구 : 대만.싱가포르.일본.중국, 한국교육과정 평가원 연구자료 ORM 2012-115-1, 2012.
  27. Min S. Y., A Study on the historico-genetic principle of learning and teaching mathematics, Doctoral dissertation in Seoul National University, 2002. 민세영, 역사발생적 수학 학습-지도 원리에 관한 연구, 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, 2002.
  28. P. Ransom, Whys and hows, For the learning of mathematics 11(2) (1991), 7-9.
  29. Seo J. Y. et al, International Comparison Research of Textbook Policy, 2011. 서지영 외, 교과서 정책 국제 비교, 한국교육과정평가원 연구자료 RRO 2011-1.
  30. C. Tzanakis, A. Arcavi et al, Integrating history of mathematics in the classroom: an analytic survey. In J. Fauvel, & J. van Maanen(eds.), History in mathematics education: the ICMI study, Kluwer, 2000, 201-240.

Cited by

  1. 중국 고등학교 수학 교육과정 및 교과서의 수학사 내용 분석 vol.31, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14477/jhm.2018.31.5.235
  2. 2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 <수학 II> 교과서에 나타난 수학사 활용 유형 분석 vol.33, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2019.33.4.471