DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Microtensile bond strength of silorane-based composite specific adhesive system using different bonding strategies

  • Bastos, Laura Alves (Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirao Preto School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo) ;
  • Sousa, Ana Beatriz Silva (Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirao Preto School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo) ;
  • Drubi-Filho, Brahim (Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirao Preto School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo) ;
  • Pires-de-Souza, Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri (Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirao Preto School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo) ;
  • Garcia, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti (Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirao Preto School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo)
  • 투고 : 2014.04.01
  • 심사 : 2014.08.06
  • 발행 : 2015.02.28

초록

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pre-etching on the bond strength of silorane-based composite specific adhesive system to dentin. Materials and Methods: Thirty human molars were randomly divided into 5 groups according to the different bonding strategies. For teeth restored with silorane-based composite (Filtek Silorane, 3M ESPE), the specific self-etching adhesive system (Adhesive System P90, 3M ESPE) was used with and without pre-etching (Pre-etching/Silorane and Silorane groups). Teeth restored with methacrylate based-composite (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE) were hybridized with the two-step self-etching system (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray), with and without pre-etching (Pre-etching/Methacrylate and Methacrylate groups), or three-step adhesive system (Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, 3M ESPE) (Three-step/Methacrylate group) (n = 6). The restored teeth were sectioned into stick-shaped test specimens ($1.0{\times}1.0mm$), and coupled to a universal test machine (0.5 mm/min) to perform microtensile testing. Results: Pre-etching/Methacrylate group presented the highest bond strength values, with significant difference from Silorane and Three-step/Methacrylate groups (p < 0.05). However, it was not significantly different from Pre-etching/Silorane and Methacrylate groups. Conclusions: Pre-etching increased bond strength of silorane-based composite specific adhesive system to dentin.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Park JW, Ferracane JL. Measuring the residual stress in dental composites using a ring slitting method. Dent Mater 2005;21:882-889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.006
  2. Truffier-Boutry D, Demoustier-Champagne S, Devaux J, Biebuyck JJ, Mestdagh M, Larbanois P, Leloup G. A physico-chemical explanation of the post-polymerization shrinkage in dental resins. Dent Mater 2006;22:405-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.030
  3. Ferracane JL. Resin composite-state of the art. Dent Mater 2011;27:29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020
  4. Fernandes ACR, Bridi EC, do Amaral FLB, Franca FMG, Florio FM, Bating RT. Microtensile bond strength of silorane or methacrylate resin-based composites associated to self-etching or conventional adhesives to dentin after different storage times. Int J Adhes Adhes 2014;48:28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.09.011
  5. Santos PJ, Silva MS, Alonso RC, D’Alpino PH. Hydrolytic degradation of silorane- and methacrylate-based composite restorations: evaluation of push-out strength and marginal adaptation. Acta Odontol Scand 2013;71:1273-1279. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.757649
  6. Kusgoz A, Ulker M, Yesilyurt C, Yoldas OH, Ozil M, Tanriver M. Silorane-based composite: depth of cure, surface hardness, degree of conversion, and cervical microleakage in Class II cavities. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011;23:324-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00411.x
  7. Ryu SJ, Cheon JH, Min JB. Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage stress in silorane-based composites. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2011;36:188-195. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.3.188
  8. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Pintado MR, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration. Dent Mater 2004;20:554-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.007
  9. Santini A, Miletic V. Comparison of the hybrid layer formed by Silorane adhesive, one-step self-etch and etch and rinse systems using confocal micro-Raman spectroscopy and SEM. J Dent 2008;36:683-691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.04.016
  10. Sousa AB, Silami FD, da Garcia L, Naves LZ, de Piresde-Souza F. Effect of various aging protocols and intermediate agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Adhes Dent 2013;15:137-144.
  11. Yesilyurt C, Bulucu B. Bond strength of total-etch and self-etch dentin adhesive systems on peripheral and central dentinal tissue: a microtensile bond strength test. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006;7:26-36.
  12. Duarte S Jr, Phark JH, Varjao FM, Sadan A. Nanoleakage, ultramorphological characteristics, and microtensile bond strengths of a new low-shrinkage composite to dentin after artificial aging. Dent Mater 2009;25:589-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.10.012
  13. Cho SY, Kang HY, Kim KA, Yu MK, Lee KW. Effect of adhesive hydrophobicity on microtensile bond strength of low-shrinkage silorane resin to dentin. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2011;36:280-289. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.4.280
  14. Hamouda IM, Samra NR, Badawi MF. Microtensile bond strength of etch and rinse versus self-etch adhesive systems. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2011;4:461-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.12.007
  15. Yoo SJ, Kim YK, Park JW, Jin MU, Kim SK. Influence of additional etching on shear bond strength of selfetching adhesive system to enamel. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2006;31:263-268. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.4.263
  16. Mine A, De Munck J, Van Ende A, Cardoso MV, Kuboki T, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. TEM characterization of a silorane composite bonded to enamel/dentin. Dent Mater 2010;26:524-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.01.010
  17. Shinohara MS, De Goes MF, Schneider LF, Ferracane JL, Pereira PN, Di Hipolito V, Nikaido T. Fluorid-containing adhesive: durability on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 2009;25:1383-1391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.011
  18. Toledano M, Osorio R, de Leonardi G, Rosales-Leal JI, Ceballos L, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA. Influence of selfetching primer on the resin adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2001;14:205-210.
  19. Sheets JL, Wilcox CW, Barkmeier WW, Nunn ME. The effect of phosphoric acid pre-etching and thermocycling on self-etching adhesive enamel bonding. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:102-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60033-X
  20. Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, Jaecques S, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Are onestep adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifatorial assessment of contemporary one-step selfetching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2009;11:175-190.
  21. Wang Y, Spencer P. Quantifying adhesive penetration in adhesive/dentin interface using confocal Raman microspectroscopy. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;59:46-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.1215
  22. Agee KL, Pashley EL, Itthagarun A, Sano H, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Submicron hiati in acid-etched dentin are artifacts of desiccation. Dent Mater 2003;19:60-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00007-6
  23. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-235.
  24. Sano H, Yoshiyama M, Ebisu S, Burrow MF, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Comparative SEM and TEM observations of nanoleakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 1995;20:160-167.
  25. Van Ende A, De Munck J, Mine A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Does a low-shrinking composite induce less stress at the adhesive interface? Dent Mater 2010;26:215-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.10.003
  26. Lohbauer U, Nikolaenko SA, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Resin tags do not contribute to dentin adhesion in self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:97-103.
  27. Van Landuyt KL, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching. J Dent 2006;34:77-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.04.001
  28. Perdigao J, Gomes G, Gondo R, Fundingsland JW. In vitro bonding performance of all-in-one adhesives. Part I - microtensile bond strengths. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:367-373.
  29. Erhardt MC, Osorio E, Aguilera FS, Proenca JP, Osorio R, Toledano M. Influence of dentin acid-etching and NaOCl-treatment on bond strengths of self-etch adhesives. Am J Dent 2008;21:44-48.
  30. Eick JD, Smith RE, Pinzino CS, Kostoryz EL. Stability of silorane dental monomers in aqueous systems. J Dent 2006;34:405-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.09.004