스마트폰 맛집 앱 사용후기 특성이 이용의도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

A Study on the Effects of the Usage Review of the Majib Smartphone Application on Use Intention

  • 한지수 (혜전대학교 호텔조리외식계열)
  • Han, Ji-Soo (Dept. of Food Service Management and Culinary, Hyejeon University)
  • 투고 : 2015.10.20
  • 심사 : 2015.12.01
  • 발행 : 2015.12.31

초록

본 연구는 스마트폰 맛집 앱에 대한 순수성, 유용성, 과장성, 동의성이 신뢰 및 지각된 위험과 최종적으로 이용의도에 미치는 영향관계를 검증하여 모바일 애플리케이션의 유용한 정보를 제시하고자 하였다. 편의표본추출법(convenience sampling)에 의해 스마트폰 맛집 앱 이용자 275명을 분석에 사용하였다. 분석결과, 첫째, 사용후기 특성 중 순수성 및 유용성과 동의성은 신뢰에 정(+)의 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타난 반면, 과장성은 신뢰에 부(-)의 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 사용후기 특성 중 순수성 및 유용성만이 지각된 위험에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 신뢰는 지각된 위험보다 이용의도에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 넷째, 신뢰와 지각된 위험 모두 스마트폰 맛집 앱 사용후기 특성 중 순수성 및 유용성, 사용후기 동의성과 이용의도 간에 매개역할을 하는 것으로 볼 수 있다.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of genuineness, usefulness, overstatement, and assentation of the smartphone majib app on trust, perceived risk, and use intention, and thereby suggest useful information for the mobile application. A survey was conducted from May 11, 2015 to June 30, 2015 targeting smartphone majib app users through convenience sampling. A total of 300 questionnaires were distributed, of which 275 were used for analysis after excluding 25 response for negligent or inappropriate responses. The results found that, first, of the review characteristics, genuineness and usefulness, assentation had positive (+) effects on trust, while overstatement had a negative (-) effect on trust. Second, of the review characteristics, only genuineness and usefulness had significant effects on perceived risk. Third, trust had a significant effect on use intention rather than on perceived risk. Fourth, trust and perceived risk had mediating effects on the relationship between the assentation of the majib smartphone app review characteristics and use intention.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bauer RA (1960). Consumer behaviour as risk taking, In R. Hancock(Ed.), Dynamic Markting for a Changing World, 389-398. Chicago: American Marketing Accociation.
  2. Belanche D, Casalo' LV, Guinaliu M (2012). Website usability, consumer satisfaction and the intention to use a website: The moderating effect of perceived risk. Journal of Retailing & Consumer Services 19(1):124-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.11.001
  3. Corbitt BJ, Thanasankit T, Yi H (2003). Trust and e-commerce : A study of consumer perceptions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2:203-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-4223(03)00024-3
  4. Choi GH, Lee SH (2011). Research provides information on the application properties of fashion smartphone: iPhone applications around. Korea Society of Clothing and Textiles Conference 2011(0):155-155.
  5. Chiou J, Cheng C (2003). Should a company have message boards on its website? Journal of Interactive Marketing 17(3):50-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10059
  6. Degeratu AM, Rangas A, Wu J (2000). Consumer choice behavior in online and traditional supermarket : The effects of brand name, price and other search attributes. International Journal of Research in Marketing 17:55-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(00)00005-7
  7. Davis FD (1989). Perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3):318-329.
  8. Goo DM (2003). An investigation on consumer's internet shopping behavior explained by the technology acceptance model. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems 13(1):141-170.
  9. Gefen D (2000). E-commerce : The role of familiarity and trust. Omega 28(6):725-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00021-9
  10. Gefen D, Karahanna E, Straub DW (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping : Amintergrated model. MIS Quarterly 27(1):51-90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
  11. Hassan AM, Kunz MB, Pearson AW, Mohamed FA (2006). Conceptualization and measurement of perceived risk in online shopping. Marketing Management Journal, Spring 138-148.
  12. Hong BS, Lee EJ, Joe MA (2009). Reviews of fashion goods internet shopping is consumer confidence, satisfaction, commitment and impact on the repurchase intention. Korea Society of Clothing and Textiles 33(11):1817-1827. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2009.33.11.1817
  13. Hackbarth G, Grover V, Yi M (2003). Computer playfulness and anxiety : Positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use. Information & Management 40:221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00006-X
  14. Heckhausen J (1997). Developmental regulation across adulthood: Primary and secondary control of age-related challenges. Developmental Psychology 33(1):176-187. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.1.176
  15. Huang CH, Chou CJ, Lin PC (2010). Involvment theory in constructing bloggers intention to purchase travel products. Tourism Management 31(4):513-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.06.003
  16. Jang MH (2005) Impact of trust and perceived risk in internet shopping also of attitudes and buying. Information Systems Research 14(1):227-249.
  17. Jeon WY, Joung HJ (2006). Effects of online reviews on evaluation and purchase intention of a product in internet shopping : The role of gender differences. Korea Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology 7(1):113-129.
  18. Jung SY, Park C (2005). Content analysis of the online word of mouth: Focusing on the differences in water type and product type. The Korea Society of Management Information Systems Proceedings 497-505.
  19. Joung JS, Youm DS (2009). Received reliability on the message sidedness, site credibility and user characteristics in onlinepostscript. Korea Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology 10(2):337-356. https://doi.org/10.21074/kjlcap.2009.10.2.337
  20. Jung SM, Kim YH (2015). A study on the effects of SNS information characteristics and SNS site characteristics on the intention to visit a restaurant. The Korean Journal of Culinary Research 21(1):159-173.
  21. Je KJ (2006). Impact on the Trust and Also Online Shopping of Online Information Product Attributes Reputation. Pusan National University, Master's Thesis.
  22. Jarvenpaa SL, Tractinsky N (1999). Consumer trust in an internet store : A cross-cultural validation. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 1(2):1-35.
  23. Jarvenpaa SL, Tractinsky N, Vitale M (2000). Consumer trust in an internet store. Information Technology and Management 1(1-2):45-71. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019104520776
  24. Kim JY, Suh EK, Suh KS (2008). Effects of perceived similarity between consumers and product reviewers onn consumer behaviors. The Korea Society of Management Information System. 18(3):67-90.
  25. Kim SW, Kang HT (2007). Analyzing the relationships among intention to use, satisfaction, trust, and perceived effectiveness of review boards as online feedback mechanism in shopping websites, KORMS 32(2):53-69.
  26. Kim GH, Joo SH, Kang YS (2012). Developing mobile service evolution framework -The Case of smartphone weather application development. Korea Productivity Association 26(1): 135-159.
  27. Kim JH, Kim HJ (2003). Do you have any characteristics of persuading the consumer to review. Korea Psychological Association Annual Conference Championships 69-70.
  28. Korea Communications Commission (2015). Wireless Communication Services Statistics.
  29. Korea Federation of Restaurants (2014). Domestic Catering Services Trend Survey Report 2014, Korea Food Service Industry Research.
  30. Lee MH, So YJ (2015). The effects of mobile bakery application's perceived usefulness and easiness on its continuous use. The Korean Journal of Culinary Research 21(2):171-186.
  31. Lee SR, Yoon HY, Namgoong Y (2010). Blog motives and customer service quality attribute analysis of eating out. Hotel Management Studies 19(6):273-287.
  32. Lee EJ, Shim WS (2007). We evaluated the time of purchase and after purchase behavior research of Internet shopping reviews message. e-Business Studies 8(3):155-170.
  33. Lee YK, Lee MW (2006). Satisfaction in relation to the website of the information quality and customer loyalty, trust, commitment role. Korea Industrial Economic Association 19(6):2367-2386.
  34. Lee EJ, Hong BS (2006). The effect of perceived utilitarian value and service quality of internet shopping on repurchase intention of fashion merchandise. Journal of the Korea Society of Costume 56(7):46-57.
  35. Lee HY (2012). Comparison of relationships involved in accordance with the types of information search and target users review restaurants online media use and consumer behavior. Tourism Research 26(6):309-326.
  36. Rhee HJ, Shim ES (2013). Effects of perceived risks of social commerce on purchase intention : Moderation role of product types. Korea Customer Satisfaction Management Association 15(1):145-165.
  37. Lee KY (2010). A study on the discontinuance intention of mobile service in post adoption context. The Korea Academic Association of Business Administration 23(1):135-156.
  38. Lin YC, Chang CCA, Lin YF (2012). Self-construal and regulatory focus influences on persuasion : The moderating role of perceived risk. Journal of Business Resarch 65(8):1152-1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.08.001
  39. Lockwood P, Chasteen AL, Wong C (2005). Age and regulatory focus determine preferences for health-related role models. Psychology and Aging 20(3):376-389. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.3.376
  40. Mcknight DH, Cummings LL, Chervany NL (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review 23(3):427-490.
  41. Mcknight DH, Chervany NL (2002). What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships : An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6(2): 35-59.
  42. Na YG, Hong BS (2008). The perceived risk and perceived usefulness of confidence in Internet shopping, attitudes and effects of purchasing fashion items. Korea Society of Clothing and Textiles 32(5):834-845. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2008.32.5.834
  43. Oh JM, Kim HH, Moon NM (2010). Regional preference study by consumption analysis of smartphone apps. Korea Society of Broadcast Engineers Summer Conference 2010. 2010(7): 328-329.
  44. Park HS (2011). The emotional and social dynamics of Matjip fever. Korea Journal of Social Theory 18:238-314.
  45. Park TW (2014). A Study on the Integrated Model of eWOM Effects through Social Network Service. Hanyang University, Master's Thesis.
  46. Pavlou PA, Gefen D (2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Review 15(1):37-59. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0015
  47. Ryu JH, Eom SH (2001). Perceived Risk of Travel Product Purchases when One Uses Internet Shopping Mall, The Tourism Science of Korea Conference (2001), pp. 255-264.
  48. Ryu JM, Hong CP, Kang KP, Kang DH, Yang DY, Jwa JW (2007). Development of mobile context awareness restaurant recommendation services. Korea Contents Association 7(5):138-145. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2007.7.5.138
  49. Sin SY, Cha SM (2013). Motive on social networking service usage of restaurant customers. The Korean Journal of Culinary Research 19(1):121-138.
  50. Sohn JG (2013). A Study on Effects of Service Quality and Usage Review of Smartphone 'Majib' Application on User Satisfaction and Reuse Intention, Catholic University, Master's Thesis.
  51. Sohn JA, Lee EY (2007). The effects of information characteristics(direction, consensus) on word-of-mouth performance in online apparel shopping internet commuication. Korea Society of Clothing and Textiles 31(8):1157-1167. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2007.31.8.1157
  52. Sung HJ (2012). The Study of the Effects of Online Social Network Service Differences on Customer Satisfaction and Intention of the Use : Focused on the extended technology acceptance model. Kyung Hee University Graduate School of Doctoral Thesis.
  53. Yang SI (2012). The Perceived Value of the Smartphone Effect on Purchase: Moderating Effect of Perceived Risk. Konkuk University, Master's Thesis.
  54. Yoo WS (2012). Perceived Attribute of the Application, Restaurants Effect of Utilization: Focusing on the Extended Technology Acceptance Model, Tourism. Sejong University Graduate School Master's Thesis.