한국시스템다이내믹스연구 (Korean System Dynamics Review)

한국시스템다이내믹스학회 (Korean System Dynamics Society)
권호 표지

리빙랩을 통한 지역공동체 활성화 방안에 관한 연구

A System Dynamics Approach of the Introduction of Local Innovative Systems to Community Development Policies in Korea

  • 최인수 (환경공학, 한국지방행정연구원) ;
  • 김건위 (행정학, 한국지방행정연구원)
  • 투고 : 2015.08.31
  • 심사 : 2015.12.22
  • 발행 : 2015.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study is to illuminate the reason why community building policies by the Government seem to fail to work properly in Korea. The existing studies focus mainly on designing community building systems, thus they cannot provide plausible explanations about the cause of the unsuccessful outcomes from the policies. To overcome the limitations of the existing studies, the authors examine the implementation factors to influence the policy instruments with the perspective of policy implementation. By performing the analysis, the results imply the implementation factors, such as executer's competence, supports by related interests, incentive systems, and legal-institutional instruments, are important to influence the implementation performance of the relevant policy instruments. To make community building successful policies, The authors therefore suggest that the capacity of local administrators and residents should be raise, and one of which the way to enhance is to support research and program development by the resident-oriented living laboratory systems in localities.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김도훈.문태훈.김동환. (2001). 시스템 다이내믹스. 서울: 대영문화사.
  2. 김동환. (2009). 시스템 사고: 시스템으로 생각하기. 선학사.
  3. 성지은 외. (2013). "리빙랩의 운영체계와 사례". STEPI INSIGHT 제 127호, 2013.10.1.
  4. 전대욱 외. (2013). "주민주도적 마을만들기의 동태적 측면에 관한 연구". 시스템다이내믹스 14(3).
  5. 전대욱 외. (2014). 선진형 지역공동체 정책적 지원방안 연구. 행정자치부.
  6. 최인수.전대욱. (2012). 지역공동체 마을만들기 사업 추진방안 연구. 한국지방행정연구원.
  7. 최인수.전대욱. (2014). 지역공동체 활성화를 위한 선진형 행.재정적 지원체계 연구. 한국지방행정 연구원.
  8. 최종원. (1998). "정책집행연구의 이론적 틀에 대한 비판적 고찰", 한국정책학회보. 제7권 제1호.
  9. Berman, Paul. (1978). The Study of Macro-and Micro-Implementation. Public Policy, 26(2).
  10. Elmore, Richard. (1985). "Forward and Backward Mapping: Reversible Logic in the Policy Analysis of Public Policy", in Kenneth Hanf and Theo A.J.(eds.), Policy Implementation in Federal and Unitary System, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  11. Hjern, Benny and Chris Hull. (1985). "Small Firm Implementation Creation: An Assistance Structure Explanation", in Kenneth Hanf and Theo A.J.(eds.), Policy Implementation in Federal and Unitary System, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  12. Lipsky, Michael. (1976). "Toward a Theory of Street-Level Bureaucracy", in Willis D. Hawley and Michael Lipsky (eds.), Theoretical Perspectives in Urban Politics, Engelwoods Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
  13. Long, Edward and Aimee E. Franklin. (2004). "The Paradox of Implementing the GPRA: Top Down Direction for Bottom-Up Implementation", Public Administration Review 64(3).
  14. Mattessich, P., B. Monsey & C. Roy. (1997). "Community Building: What Makes It Work? A Review of Factors Influencing Successful Community Building." Amherst H. Wilder Foundation: St Paul, Minnesota.
  15. O'Toole, Laurence J. (2004). "The Theory-Practice Issue in Policy Implementation Research", Public Administration 82(2).
  16. Sabatier, Paul P. (1986). "Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: A Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis", Journal of Public Policy 6(1).
  17. Sabatier, Paul P. and Daniel Mazmanian. (1979). "The Conditions of Effective Implementation: A Guide to Accomplishing Policy Objectives", Policy Analysis 5.
  18. Thompson, James R. (2000). "Reinvention as Reform: Assessing the National Performance Review", Public Administration Review 60(6).