KIISE Transactions on Computing Practices (정보과학회 컴퓨팅의 실제 논문지)

Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers (한국정보과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Proposal : Improvement of Testing Frontier Capability Assessment Model through Comparing International Standards in Software Product and Software Testing Process Perspective

소프트웨어 제품과 프로세스 관점에서 국제표준과 비교를 통한 테스팅 프론티어 역량평가 모델 개선 방안

  • 윤형진 (고려대학교 소프트웨어공학과) ;
  • 최진영 (고려대학교 컴퓨터학과)
  • Received : 2014.09.05
  • Accepted : 2014.11.19
  • Published : 2015.02.15
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Testing Frontier Capability Assessment Model (TCAM) is based on ISO/IEC 9126, TMMi and TPI. Since ISO/IEC 9126, TMMi and TPI were made over 10 years ago, TCAM faces the problem that it can not assess and analyze the capability of small businesses that employ new software development methods or processes, for example Agile, TDD(Test Driven Development), App software, and Web Software. In this paper, a method to improve the problem is proposed. The paper is composed of the following sections: 1) ISO/IEC 9126, ISO/IEC 25010 and ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119 part 2 review 2) TCAM review 3) software product quality perspective comparison, and analysis between ISO/IEC 9126, ISO/IEC 25010 and TCAM 4) comparison, and analysis between ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119 part2 and TCAM and 5) proposal for the improvement of TCAM.

테스팅 프론티어 역량평가 모델은 10년 전 만들어진 ISO/IEC 9126의 소프트웨어 제품 품질기준과 TMMi, TPI의 프로세스 점검 기준들을 사용하다보니, Agile, TDD와 같은 새로운 프로세스와 App, Web 같은 새로운 종류의 소프트웨어 제품을 개발하는 회사들에 대한 역량평가가 어려울 수밖에 없다. 이런 문제에 대한 개선을 위하여 1) 소프트웨어 제품 품질 국제표준 ISO/IEC 9126, ISO/IEC 25010 그리고 SW 테스팅 프로세스 국제표준 ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119 part2 고찰, 2) TCAM 소개, 3) 소프트웨어 제품품질 관점에서 ISO/IEC 9126, ISO/IEC 25010와 TCAM 비교, 분석 4) 소프트웨어 테스팅 프로세스 관점에서 ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119 part2와 TCAM 비교, 분석, 5) TCAM의 개선을 위한 방안을 제안한다.

Keywords

References

  1. National IT Industry Promotion Agency, 2012 Software Industry Analysis Report, pp. 17, 2013. (in Korea)
  2. Gartner, IDC, Strategy Analytics, company filings, BI Intelligence estimates.
  3. Korean Standards Information Centre, 1. Software engineering-Product Quality-part 1:Quality model, 2006. (in Korean)
  4. Korean Standards Information Centre, Systems and software engineering-Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation(SQuaRE)-System and software models, 2011. (in Korean)
  5. Hyung-Jin Yoon, "Introduction to Testing frontier Capability Assessment Model and Case study," Joint Workshop on Software Engineering Technology 2011, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 93-108, Aug. 2011.
  6. Mary Beth Chrissis, Mike Konrad, Sandy Shrum, CMMI for Development, 3rd Ed., Addison-Wesley, pp. 31-41, 2011.
  7. Seoung-Min Lee, Joon-Seok Oh, Jin-Young Choi, "Comparative analysis on potential error-possibility and security," Proc. of the KIISE Korea Computer Congress 2010, v.37/1, pp. 106-109, Jun. 2010. (in Korean)
  8. Da-Hye Jung, Jin-Young Choi, Song-Hee Lee, "Nuclear-related software analysis based on secure coding," Journal of The Korea Institute of Information Security and Cryptology, pp. 243-250, v23/2, Apr. 2013. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.13089/JKIISC.2013.23.2.243
  9. OWASP, Software Assurance Maturity Model_v1.0, (2009. March 25), [Online]. Available: http://www.opensamm.org/download