DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determination of Key Factors for the Pedestrian LOS Introducing the Accessibility Index

접근성 지표를 도입한 보행로 서비스 수준의 영향요인 규명

  • CHOI, Sung Taek (Research Institute of Science and Technology, Hongik University) ;
  • CHOO, Sang Ho (Department of Urban Design and Planning, Hongik University) ;
  • JANG, Jin Young (Department of Urban Design and Planning, Hongik University)
  • 최성택 (홍익대학교 과학기술연구소) ;
  • 추상호 (홍익대학교 도시공학과) ;
  • 장진영 (홍익대학교 도시공학과)
  • Received : 2015.09.03
  • Accepted : 2015.12.23
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

A considerable amount of literature has been published on pedestrian LOS. So far, however, there is a limitation that LOS analysis methodologies has concentrated on quantitative variables such as pedestrian flow rate, speed and space. This paper intended to suggest the accessibility variable which can not be considered on previous study. The factor was defined and quantified using public transport attributes in particular. This study was carried out in three phases: 1. defined accessibility employing public mode location and service information. 2. investigated the relationship between accessibility and pedestrian flow rate 3. developed the model to establish the factors affected to pedestrian LOS. The results showed that accessibility, walkway attribute and land use type affected the pedestrian LOS. Especially, accessibility and commercial area ratio had negative relationship with LOS. Futhermore, pedestrian LOS declined when obstacle of bus station located on the walkway. On the contrary, LOS was upgraded when sufficient effective width or residential area was secured. These results can receive considerable critical attentions related to determination of pedestrian LOS or effective walkway width.

보행로 서비스 수준 평가에 활용된 기존 지표는 보행의 양적인 측면에만 집중한다는 점에서 서비스 수준을 올바르게 평가하지 못하는 한계점을 갖고 있다. 이를 극복하기 위해 본 연구는 평가를 위한 효과척도로 접근성 지표를 제안하였다. 특히 대중교통수단과 보행로간의 접근성에 주목하여 변수를 구축하였다. 본 연구는 3단계로 구성된다. 1단계에서는 버스와 지하철 등의 대중교통 지표를 활용해 접근성 변수를 수단별로 정의하였다. 2단계에서는 접근성 변수와 보행류율간의 상관관계를 검토하였다. 3단계에서는 접근성 변수를 포함한 보행로 서비스 수준의 영향요인을 규명하는 모형을 개발하였다. 개발 결과, 접근성, 보행로 기하구조, 주거와 상업 등의 토지이용 용도 등이 보행로 서비스 수준에 영향을 끼치는 것으로 나타났다. 특히 접근성, 상업용도 면적 비율은 보행 활동을 유인하여 서비스 수준을 떨어트리는 것으로 밝혀졌다. 이와 함께 지장물과 버스 정류장이 입지하는 경우에도 서비스 수준은 하락하였다. 그러나 주거면적 비율이 높거나 유효보도폭이 넓을수록 서비스 수준은 향상되는 것으로 분석되었다. 이러한 결과는 보행로 서비스 수준 산정, 유효보도폭 결정 등의 분야에 활용될 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bruce W. L., Venkat R. V., Russell M. O., Douglas S. M., Martin G. (2007), Modeling The Roadside Walking Environment: A Pedestrian Level of Service, Transportation Research Board, 01-0511, 1-27.
  2. Chinmoy S., Chris W., John G. (2014), Healthy Cities: Public Health through Urban Planning, Edward Elgar.
  3. Cho D. H. (2014), The Spatial Distribution of the Single-households Elderly and Public Transport Accessibility in Seoul, Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 17(2), 119-136.
  4. Choi S. T., Rho J. H. (2015), Development and Implementation of a 2-Phase Calibration Method for Gravity Model Considering Accessibility, J. Korean Soc. Transp., 33(4), Korean Society of Transportation, 393-404. https://doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2015.33.4.393
  5. Chung J. H., Seol J. H., Choi S. T., Rho J. H., Lee J. S. (2014), Severity Analysis for Vulnerable Pedestian Accident Utilizing Vehicle Recorder Database of Taxi, Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, 29(3), 98-106. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2014.29.3.098
  6. Frank J. (2000), Pedestrian Level of Service Based on Trip Quality, Transportation Research Board, G-1/1-14.
  7. Jang J. Y., Choi S. T., Lee H. S., Kim S. J., Choo S. H. (2015), A Comparison Analysis of Factors to Affect Pedestrian Volumes by Land-use Type Using Seoul Pedestrian Survey Data, The journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems, 14(2), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.12815/kits.2015.14.2.039
  8. Jang S. Y., Han S. Y., Kim S. G. (2010), A Study on Level of Service of Pedestrian Facility in Transfer Stations at Urban Railroad, Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, 13(3), 339-348.
  9. Kang K. W., Lee K. R. (2010), Development of the Bicycle Level of Service Model From the User's Perspective, J. Korean Soc. Transp., 28(3), Korean Society of Transportation, 75-84.
  10. Kim E. C., Choi E. J., Yang J. Y. (2015), A Study on Enhancement Methods of Level of Service Analysis for Pedestrian Sidewalks, J. Korean Soc. Transp., 33(1), Korean Society of Transportation, 29-39. https://doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2015.33.1.29
  11. Kim J. H., Oh Y. T., Son Y. T., Park W. S. (2002), A Study on Estimating Level-of-Service for Pedestrian Facilities, J. Korean Soc. Transp., 20(1), Korean Society of Transportation, 149-156.
  12. Kim K. H. (1999), Evaluation Criteria of the Walkway Level-of-Service in Korea, J. Korean Soc. Transp., 17(3), Korean Society of Transportation, 31-46.
  13. Kim K. H., Park S. H., Kim D. H. (2006), Estimating the Level-of-Service for Walkways by Using Fuzzy Approximate Reasoning, Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 26(2), 241-250.
  14. Kim S. K., Choi J. S., Kim S. Y., Kim S. M. (2011), Evaluation of Pedestrian Road Level of Service by Survey and DGPS, 2011 Conference of Korean Society of Road Engineers, 179-184.
  15. Kim T. H., Jeong K. S., Koo J. H., Won J. M. (2009), A Development and Application of Evalutation Criteria for Pedestrian Quality of Service Using Analytic Network Process, Journal of Korea Planners Association, 44(1), 211-222.
  16. Kim T. H., Jin J. W., Bae G. M. (2008), An Analysis of Influencing Factors to Pedestrian Quality of Service by Utilizing Analytic Hierarchy Process, Journal of Korean Society of Road Engineers, 10(3), 69-77.
  17. Kim T. H., Lee K. Y., Park J. J. (2009), Factor Analysis of Pedestrian Perceived LOS, Seoul Metropolitan Research, 10(2), 161-173.
  18. Lim J. K., Shin H. S., Kim H. C. (2004), New Pedestrian Level of Service by Trip Purpose and Walkway Function, Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 24(5), 723-728.
  19. Lim J. S., Oh Y. T. (2002), Estimation of Pedestrian Capacity for Walkway, J. Korean Soc. Transp., 20(1), Korean Society of Transportation, 91-99.
  20. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2013), Korea Highway Capacity Manual, Ch.14.
  21. Moon J. S., Lee J. L., Koo J. H. (2012), Selection of Evaluation Items for Pedestrian -Priority Zone Plan and Weights Analysis according to Zone Types, Journal of Korea Planners Association, 47(4), 241-251.
  22. Sarkar S. (2003), Qualitative Evaluation of Comfort Needs in Urban Walkways in Major Activity Centers, TRB 2003 annual meeting, 1-32.
  23. Seoul (2012), 2012 Seoul Pedestrian Survey, 3.
  24. Shin H. M., Kim T. H., Jeong K. S., Won J. M. (2009), A Development of Service Quality Evaluation Models for Pedestrians in Newtown Using Structural Equation Modeling, Seoul Metropolitan Research, 10(1), 183-196.
  25. Sohn D. W., Kim J. (2010), Analysis of the Relationships between Land Use Characteristics of Urban Transit Centers and the Level of Transit Usage: Case Studies of Seoul Metropolitan Area, journal of the urban design institute of Korea, 11, 33-44.
  26. Soren U. J. (2013), Pedestrian and Bicycle Level of Service at Intersections, Roundabouts and other Crossings, TRB 2013 annual meeting, 1-19.
  27. Transportation Research Board (2010), Highway Capacity Manual, TRB, Ch.11 and Ch.18.