Journal of radiological science and technology (대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학)

Korean Society of Radiological Science (대한방사선과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Impacts of Piezoelectric Elements' Defects On Color & Power Doppler Images

초음파 프로브에서 소자결함이 컬러 및 파워 도플러 영상에 미치는 영향

  • 이경성 (제주한라대학교 방사선과)
  • Received : 2015.10.27
  • Accepted : 2015.12.08
  • Published : 2015.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

An ultrasound probe has a big impact on Doppler images even though it has very high risk of frequent function-breakdowns occurring in medical ultrasound scanners. This study experimentally analyses the impacts of an ultrasonic probe's defected elements on power & color Doppler images. The results show that, the bigger the size of defected probe elements is, and the closer a group of action elements is to the center, the more the brightness of images and the velocity of Doppler diminish. When elements' defects increase in color & power Doppler images, false images are formed to be mistaken for blood-vessel plaque in neighboring regions. Accordingly, whenever element defects are suspected, we need check-up process in B-mode. From this respective, it is advisable to have primary interest in a probe and carry out continuous probe QA for ultrasonography.

초음파 프로브는 초음파 진단기에서 성능 결함이 발생할 빈도가 매우 높으면서 도플러 영상에 미치는 영향이 크다. 본 연구는 초음파 프로브의 소자 결함이 파워 및 칼러 도플러 영상에 미치는 영향을 실험적으로 살펴 본 것이다. 실험 결과 초음파 프로브 소자 결함은 그 크기가 클수록 도플러 활동 소자군 중심부에 위치할수록 도플러 영상의 밝기 및 도플러 속도를 크게 감소시키는 것으로 나타났다. 컬러 및 파워 도플러 영상에서 소자 결함이 증가할수록 혈관의 주변 부위에서부터 혈관 플라그로 오인할 수 있는 허상이 생기고 있음을 보여 주었다. 따라서 소자결함이 의심될 때는 B-모드에서 확인과정이 필요하다. 이를 볼 때 초음파 검사에 있어서는 우선적으로 프로브에 관심을 가지고 지속적인 초음파프로브 QA가 중요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang G S, Choi M J, Park S S, Paeng D G, Gibson N M and Coleman A J : Deterioration of the quality of ultrasonic images caused by probe defects. Proc. Acoust. Soc. Kor. Conference 2005, 24, 165-168, 2005
  2. Weigang B, Moore G W, Gessert J and Schafer M : The effect and mechanisms of ultrasound transducer degradation on the quality and clinical efficacy of diagnostic ultrasound examinations. Sonora Medical Systems, Longmont, USA (http://www.4sonora.com), White Paper 2008
  3. Moore G W, Gessert J and Schafer M : Perspectives On Image Performance Assessment II : The Impact of Compromised Elements Within An Ultrasound Transducer On Image and Doppler Quality. American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) 45th Annual Meeting, San Diego, California, USA, 10-14 Aug 2003
  4. Lee Kyung-Sung : Influence to the Doppler images by the defects of piezoelectric elements of the probe of medical ultrasonic scanners (Focusing on the impact of an increase in the defects of piezoelectric elements), J. Radiological Science & Technology, 37(2), 117-124, 2014
  5. Lee Kyung-Sung : Influence to the Doppler images by the Defects of SAE in the Probe of Medical ultrasonic scanners, J. Radiological Science & Technology, 38(1), 7-15, 2015 https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2015.38.1.02
  6. Cho Yeong-hwan, Sung Keong-Mo : Design and Fabrication of Linear Array Transducer for Ultrasonic Medical Imaging System, Spring conference of The Korean society of Medical & Biological Engineering, collected papers 29-32 May 1990
  7. Mitchell D G. : Color Doppler imaging: principles, limitations and artifacts. Radiology, 177, 1-10, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.177.1.2204956
  8. Pozniak M A, Zagzebski J A and Scanlan K A : Spectral and color Doppler artifacts. Radiographics, 12, 35-44, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.12.1.1734480
  9. Japan Society Sonographers (Translation with Seo Dae-Cheol and Kwon Tae-Won) : Textbook of Vascular Ultrasound Examination, Korea Medical Book Publisher Co, 2007
  10. Choi M J, Kang K S, Lee K S, Yang J H, Paeng D G , Kim C C, Rhim S, Gibson N and Coleman A : Low Contrast Sensitivity of B-mode Images against Ultrasonic Probe Defects, The World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, KOEX, Seoul, Korea, 28 May - 1 June 2006
  11. Dudley N J, Griffith K, Houldsworth G, Holloway M and Dunn M A : A review of two alternative ultrasound quality assurance programmes. European Journal of Ultrasound, 12, 233-245, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-8266(00)00119-1