Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association (한국터널지하공간학회 논문집)

Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association (한국터널지하공간학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A preliminary study on the use of analytic hierarchy process for selecting a optimum trenchless excavation method

최적의 비개착공법 선정을 위한 계층분석법의 적용에 관한 기초연구

  • Kang, Tae-Ho (Geotechnical Engineering Research Division, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology) ;
  • Chang, Soo-Ho (Geotechnical Engineering Research Division, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology) ;
  • Choi, Soon-Wook (Geotechnical Engineering Research Division, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology) ;
  • Lee, Chulho (Geotechnical Engineering Research Division, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology) ;
  • Cho, Jinwoo (Geotechnical Engineering Research Division, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology)
  • 강태호 (한국건설기술연구원 지반연구소) ;
  • 장수호 (한국건설기술연구원 지반연구소) ;
  • 최순욱 (한국건설기술연구원 지반연구소) ;
  • 이철호 (한국건설기술연구원 지반연구소) ;
  • 조진우 (한국건설기술연구원 지반연구소)
  • Received : 2015.11.09
  • Accepted : 2015.11.23
  • Published : 2015.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

There have been high demands for urban underground structures. However, they should be rapidly constructed while maintaining the functions of adjacent structures and road systems especially in urban areas. In this respect, trenchless excavation methods are considered to very effective in minimizing ground displacements during excavation works. A variety of field conditions such as economic, technical and environmental aspects should be taken into consideration when an optimum trechless excavation method is to be chosen in a given condition. Therefore, this study aims to carry out a fundamental study to select an optimum trenchless excavation method by the decision making technique. Especially, AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) which is a kind of a multiple attribute decision making process is adopted to consider the opinions of experts and to derive reliable decision criteria. As a result, the weights of key factors and the most effective trenchless methods for different ground conditions were proposed in this study.

도심지에서는 지속적인 지하 개발이 요구되고 있으며, 도심지공사는 주변구조물 및 기존 도로의 기능을 유지하면서 신속하게 진행되어야한다. 이러한 상황에서 비개착공법은 시공 시 주변 지반의 변위를 최소화하고 건설을 진행하기에 매우 유용한 공법이다. 그러나 비개착공법 선정을 위해서는 경제성, 시공성, 환경문제, 주변구조물 등 다양한 현장조건들을 고려하여야 한다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 의사결정기법을 활용하여 비개착공법의 최적 선정을 위한 기초연구를 수행하였다. 특히, 다중복합의사결정기법 중에 하나인 계층분석법을 이용하여 전문가 의견을 반영한 합리적인 공법선정의 평가기준과 규칙을 설정하였다. 분석 결과, 비개착공법을 선정하는데 있어서 필요한 고려항목들의 중요도를 도출하였고, 지반조건별로 가장 효과적인 비개착공법들이 제시되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Alpay, S., Yavuz, M. (2009), "Underground mining method selection by decision making tools.", Tunnel. Underg, Vol. 24, Issue 2, pp. 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2008.07.003
  2. Bieniawski, Z.T., Tamames, B.C., Fernandez, J.M.G., Hernandez, M.A. (2006), "Rock mass excavability indicator: new way to selecting the optimum tunnel construction method." In:ITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress&32nd ITA General Assembly, Seoul, Korea.
  3. Boshkov, S.H., Wright, F.D. (1973), Basic and parametric criteria in the selection, design and development of underground mining systems, SME Mining Engineering Handbook. SME-AIME, New York.
  4. Cheng, C-H. (1997), "Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of member ship function.", European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 96, Issue 2, pp. 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00026-4
  5. Cheng, C-H., Yang, K-L., Hwang, C-L. (1999), "Evaluating attack helicopter s by AHP based on linguistic variable weight.", European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 116, Issue 2, pp. 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00156-8
  6. Dyer, J.S., Wendell, R.E. (1985), "A critique of the analytic hierarchy process.", Working paper 84/85-4-24, Department of Management, The University of Texas at Austin.
  7. Einstein, H.H., Dudt, J.P., Halabe, V.B., Descoudres, F. (1992), "Decision aids in tunneling-principle and practical application.", Monograph. Swiss Federation Office of Transportation.
  8. Hartman, H.L. (1987), Introductory Mining Engineering, John Wiley, New Jersey.
  9. ITA (2000), Recommendations and Guidelines for Tunnel Boring Machines (TBMs). ITA-AITES Working Group No. 14.
  10. Korea Expressway Corporation (2012), Expressway Construction Guide Specification (Civil).
  11. Korea Rail Network Authority (2012), Guide Specification for High Speed Railway Construction (Subbase volume).
  12. Kourosh Shahriar, Mostafa Sharifzadeh, Jafar Khademi Hamidi (2008), "Geotechnical risk assessment based approach for rock TBM selection in difficult ground conditions.", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 23, 318-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.06.012
  13. Laubscher, D.H. (1981), Selection of Mass Underground Mining Methods, Design and Operation of Caving and Sublevel Stoping Mines. SME-AIME, New York.
  14. Levary, R.R., Wan, K. (1997), "An analytic hierarchy process based simulation model for entry mode decision regarding foreign direct investment.", Omega, Vol. 27, Issue 6, pp. 661-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00032-8
  15. Miller-Tait, L., Panalkis, R., Poulin, R. (1995), "UBC mining method selection.", In: Proceeding of the Mine Planning and Equipment Selection Symposium, pp. 163-168.
  16. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2009), Tunnel Standard Specification.
  17. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2012), Road Design Criteria.
  18. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2013), Railway Design Criteria (Subbase volume), Korea Rail Network Authority.
  19. Morrison, R.G.K. (1976), AW Philosophy of Ground Control, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
  20. Nicholas, D.E. (1981), Method Selection - A Numerical Approach, Design and Operation of Caving and Sublevel Stoping Mines. SME-AIME, New York.
  21. Nord, G., Stille, H. (1988), "Bore and blast techniques in difficult types of rock: Sweden's experience.", Int. J. Tunnel. Underground Space Technol. Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 45-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-7798(88)90032-6
  22. Saaty, T.L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New york, McGraw-Hill.
  23. Saaty, T.L. (2000), Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS, Pittsburg.
  24. Shim, J.P. (1989), "Bibiographical research on the analytic hierarchy process.", Socio-Economic Planning Science, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(89)90035-9
  25. Singpurwalla, N., Forman, E., Zalkind, D. (1999), "Promoting shared health care decision making using the analytic hierarchy process.", Socio-Economic Planning Science, Vol. 33, Issue 4, pp. 277-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(99)00009-9
  26. Vargas, L.G. (1990), "An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications.", European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 48.
  27. Vincent S. Lai, Robert P. Trueblood, Bo K. Wong (1999), "Software selection: a case study of the application of the analytical hierarchical process to the selection of a multimedia authoring system.", Information & Management, Vol. 36, Issue 4, pp. 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(99)00021-X
  28. Zahedi, F. (1986), "The analytic hierarchy process: a survey of the method and its applications.", Interfaces, Vol. 16, July-Aug, pp. 96-108.