DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study about the satisfaction with simulation practice course experience on ACLS of paramedic students

전문심장소생술 시뮬레이션 실습교육 경험 만족도에 관한 연구 -응급구조학과 학생대상-

  • 유순규 (을지대학교 응급구조학과) ;
  • 권혜지 (을지대학교 응급구조학과)
  • Received : 2015.09.21
  • Accepted : 2015.10.08
  • Published : 2015.10.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analysis a Korean version of Satisfaction with Simulation Experience(SSE) Scale by paramedic students. Total number of 111 students majoring in the EMT-paramedic education area have taken part in the survey after completing the professional cardiac resuscitation simulative training, using the standardized simulation satisfaction evaluation method (SSE scale). Through the scale, one's preference, necessity, ACLS theory grade, and satisfaction rate per year regarding the training were measured. To analyze one's preference, necessity, ACLS theory grade, and satisfaction rate per year in regards to the training, one-way ANOVA was used. The result reveals that the overall satisfaction rate was generally quite high. When one's preference and necessity rate is high, the satisfaction rate also seems to increase. The result indicates that the simulation training will enhance the students' clinical skill, patient evaluation, and treatment capability as well as one's field adaptation skill at the time of an emergency occurrence. Eventually, training through the ACLS simulation will be used in the future for the benefit of encouraging students from emergency rescue to adapt to the site of an emergency. Therefore, such an education method should be maintained and further developed.

본 연구는 응급구조학과 학생대상 한국판 시뮬레이션 경험 만족도 측정도구 분석을 목적으로 응급구조학과 학생 총 111명을 대상으로 ACLS시뮬레이션 실습교육 후 학생들이 느끼는 만족도를 측정 후 분석하였다. 또한 시뮬레이션 교육에 대한 호감도, 필요성, 전문심장소생술 이론 성적이 시뮬레이션 실습교육 만족도에 미치는 영향 및 상관관계를 확인하고자 한다. 측정된 만족도는 일원배치분산분석을 통하여 분석하였으며, 그 결과 대부분의 학생들이 높은 만족도를 나타냈다. 시뮬레이션 교육에 대한 호감도 및 필요도가 높을수록 만족도 측정도구의 세 가지 요인 모두에서 높게 나타났으나, ACLS이론 성적과 만족도의 상관관계는 성립되지 않았다. 향후 ACSL 시뮬레이션을 통한 교육법은 유지되어야 하며 지속적으로 발전해야 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Hur HK, Roh YS, "Effects of a simulation based clinical reasoning practice program on clinical competence in nursing students", Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, Vol.25, No. 5, pp. 574-584, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2013.25.5.574
  2. Miler GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 1990;65(9):63-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045
  3. Pack H, Lee J, Hwang H, Lee J, Choi Y, Kim H, Ahn, D.H., The agreement of checklist recordings between faculties and standardized patients in an objective structured clinical examination(OSCE). Korean J Emerg Med Ser 2003;15(2)143-5 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2003.15.2.141
  4. Vu NV, Barrows HS, March ML, Verhulst SJ, Colliver JA, Travis T. Six years of comprehensive, clinical, performance-based assessment using standardized patients at the Southern Illiois University School of Medicine. Acad Med 1992;67(1):42-50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199201000-00009
  5. Gardner R, Raemer DB. Simulation in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2008;35(1):97-127. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2007.12.008
  6. S. O. Lee, M. R. Eom & J. H. Lee, "Use of simulation in nursing education", Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 90-94, 2007.
  7. Korean Educational Development Institute. Development of School Education Satisfaction Survey Instruments.
  8. Prion,S. A practical framework for evaluating the impact of clinical simulation experiences in prelicensure nursing education. (Electronic version) Clinical simulation in nursing 2008; 4(5): e69-e78. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2008.08.002
  9. Bruce,S, Scherer, Y, Curran, C., Urschel, D., Erdley, S., Ball, L. A collaborative exercise between graduate and undergraduate nursing a computer assisted simulation in a mock cardiac arrest. Nursing Education Research 2009;30(1):22-2
  10. Kwon HJ. Yoou SK. Variation of a Korean version of the satisfaction with simulation experience scale for paramedic students. Korean J Emerg Med Ser 2014;18(2):7-20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14408/KJEMS.2014.18.2.007
  11. Levett Jones T, McCoy M, Lapkin S, Noble D, Hoffman K, Dempsey J, et al. The development and psychometric testing of the satisfaction experience scale. Nurs Educ Today 2011;31(7):705-10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.01.004
  12. Roh YS, Validation of Korean version of the satisfaction with simulation experience scale. The Journal of the Korean Society for Simulation in Healthcare 2012;1(1):6-11.
  13. Beak ML. Implementation effects of emergency trauma patient simulation. Korean J. Emerg Med Ser 2011;15(2):43-54.
  14. Decker S, Sportsman S, Puetz L, Billings L(2008). The Evolution of Simulation and Its Contribution Competency. The J. of Continuing Edu in Nurs 2008;39(2):74-80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20080201-06
  15. S. Barry Issenberg, William C. Mcgaghie, Emil R. Petrusa, Dvavid Lee Gordon & Ross J. Scalese. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Medical teacher 2005;27(1):10-28. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421590500046924