Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Suggestion for Change in Risk Management Based Government Quality Assurance Activities of Military Supplies

위험관리기반의 군수품 품질보증업무 변화를 위한 제언

  • Ahn, Nam-Su (Department of Industrial Management, Ulsan College)
  • 안남수 (울산과학대학교 산업경영과)
  • Received : 2015.05.06
  • Accepted : 2015.09.11
  • Published : 2015.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, Recently, many quality problems in military supplies are raised such as K-series weapons(K-2 tank, K-9 Self-propelled artillery and K-11 Armoured Car and etc.) quality issues, leaking combat shoe issue and so on. Existing one and only national quality assurance agency for military supplies, Defense Agency for Technology and Quality(DTaQ) adapted risk management based framework to perform the government quality assurance activities. However, risk framework established by DTaQ seems lack of objectivity, consistency and efficiency. In this research, we first reviewed the DTaQ's regulations to identify the possible problems, and then suggested the alternatives which are based on advanced risk management framework and plan-do-check-action(PDCA) cycle. In conclusion, we suggested the new risk management framework, so called visual PDCA fishbone chart, and illustrated the use of the framework via real instance.

최근 들어 군수품에 대한 품질문제가 다양한 형태로 발생하면서, 품질보증업무를 수행하는 국방기술품질원의 위험관리기반 프레임웍에 대한 변화의 필요성이 제기되고 있다. 본 논문에서는 먼저 위험관리관련 수행된 기존 연구들을 검토한 후, 현재 국방기술품질원과 위험관리기반 체제를 채택하고 있는 국내 외 기관 두 곳의 업무규정을 비교 분석하여 문제점 식별 및 개선점을 도출 하였다. 본 연구에서 제안하는 새로운 위험관리 프레임웍은 PDCA 프레임웍을 기반으로 눈에 보이는 관리를 위해 Fishbone차트의 활용을 제안하였다. 또한 마인드맵 소프트웨어의 활용을 통해 군수품 위험관리 사례의 구현으로 실제업무의 적용가능성을 검토해 보았다.

Keywords

References

  1. B. K. Cho, "New Combat Uniforms - Too hot to wear", Chosun Daily Press, July 22, 2012.
  2. S. H, Yoon, "Corruption in Tongyoung Ship, Military-Mafia and K Series Weapon", Donga Daily Press, Oct. 29, 2014.
  3. T. H. Kang, "Problems in Korean Weapons", Hangyerae Daily Press, Nov. 4, 2014.
  4. H. O. Jun, "Forged 2,749 Test Reports in Military Service", Yonhap Daily Press, Mar. 17, 2014.
  5. D. H. Oh, "Producing Military Goods through Prisoners in Jail", Newsis, Apr. 20, 2015
  6. J. O. Kim, "DAPA modified the Regulation to upgrade the military goods quality", New1 Press, Feb. 24, 2014
  7. Department of Acquisition Policy, "Regulation of Defense Acquisition Program", Defense Acquisition Program Administration, Dec. 23, 2014.
  8. Regulation Reform and Legal Affairs Officer, "Manufacturing Readiness Assessment Task Manual", Defense Acquisition Program Administration, May. 23, 2014.
  9. Defense Agency for Technology and Quality, Test Report and Information Service, Available From: https:// etd.dtaq.re.kr/etd/indexAgency.jsp, (Accessed Apr., 20, 2015)
  10. J. H. Lee, "Creative Defense through Overpass Paradigm",, Kookbang Daily Press, Mar. 3, 2015.
  11. H. K. Kim, "DTaQ Performs Random Inspection for 135 Military Food Supplier", Newsis, Mar. 24, 2014.
  12. G. A. Zsidisin, L. M. Ellran, J.R. Carter, J. L. Cavinato, "An analysis of supply risk assessment techniques", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 397-413, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09600030410545445
  13. J. Hallikas,V. Virolainen, M. Tuominen, "Risk analysis and assessment in network environments: A dyadic case study", International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 45-55, 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00098-6
  14. Z. Shapira, "Risk taking: A Managerial Perspective", Russell Sage Foundation, 1995.
  15. P. Steels, B. Count, "Profitable purchasing strategies: a manager's guide for improving organizational competitiveness through the skills of purchasing", McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1996.
  16. L. Michalski, "How to identify vendor risk", Pharmaceutical technology, Vol. 24, No. 10, pp. 180-184, 2000.
  17. S. J. Lee, H. J. Kim, H. S. Seo, "Exploratory Study on Risk Factors by Project Performance Areas in Software Project Management", Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 103-120, 2004.
  18. S. J. Cho, S. J. Lee,Y. K, Ham, An Empirical Study on Risk Factors in Information System Project Management", Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 103-120, 2004.
  19. S. N. Hong, "A Case Study on Risk Factors and Risk Management in a Large-scale Project", The Journal of Information System, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 97-116, 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2010.19.1.097
  20. Defense Agency for Technology and Quality, Introduction, Available From: https://www.dtaq.re.kr, (Accessed Jun., 12, 2015)
  21. Division of Policy & Planning, "Regulation of Defense Quality Management", Defense Agency for Technology and Quality, Apr. 2, 2015.
  22. The Board of Audit and Inspection, Request of Non-conformance Product Handling Method and Defense Specification Reestablishment, The Board of Audit and Inspection, 2014.
  23. Department of Defense, "Risk Management Guide for DoD Acquisition", Department of Defense, Aug. 2006
  24. Defense Contract Management Agency, "Government Contract Quality Assurance Surveillance Planning", Department of Defense, Jan. 27, 2014.
  25. Defense Contract Management Agency, "Product Examination", Defense Contract Management Agency, July. 2014.
  26. Department of Defense, "MIL-STD-1916 DoD Preferred Methods for Acceptance of Product", Department of Defense, 1996.
  27. American Society for Quality, ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 "Sampling Procedures and Table for Inspection by Attributes", American Society for Quality, 2008.
  28. Department of Medical Device Evaluation, "Medical Device International Standard Technical Document Writing Guideline", Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Sep. 2014.
  29. N. S. Ahn, J. S. Jung, W. K. Jung, W, Y, Hwang, S. W. Park, "Sampling Procedure Enhancement in Government Defense Quality assurance Procedures", Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2012.40.3.245
  30. XMind Ltd., XMind 6, 2015.
  31. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Wikipedia, 6, 2015.