Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy (식물분류학회지)

The Korean Society of Plant Taxonomists (한국식물분류학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Taxonomy of tribe Neillieae (Rosaceae): Physocarpus

나도국수나무족의 분류: 산국수나무속

  • Received : 2015.11.22
  • Accepted : 2015.12.09
  • Published : 2015.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The tribe Neillieae, a small group of about 18 species in the Rosaceae, comprises three taxonomically difficult genera, Neillia, Physocarpus, and Stephanandra. The tribe, characterized by lobed leaves with persistent or deciduous stipules and ovoid, shiny seeds with copious endosperm, is strongly supported as a monophyletic group by a variety of lines of molecular evidence. Due to the high amount of morphological variation across the three genera and the species in tribe Neillieae, conflicting classification schemes and numerous species have been proposed over the past three centuries. However, no comprehensive systematic study of the group, including all species across their geographic ranges, has ever been undertaken. As part of a taxonomic revision of tribe Neillieae, a revision of Physocarpus based on the morphological examination of herbarium specimens, including types, and field observation is presented. Artificial keys, comprehensive nomenclatural treatments, descriptions, distribution maps, and lists of specimens examined are provided. Six species in Physocarpus are recognized. A lectotype is here designated for the following species: Opulaster pubescens, Opulaster ramaleyi, Spiraea opulifolia var. parvifolia, Spiraea opulifolia var. tomentella, Physocarpus michiganensis, and Physocarpus missouriensis.

장미과 나도국수나무족(Neillieae)은 많은 분류학적 문제점을 안고 있는 나도국수나무속(Neillia), 국수나무속(Stephanandra), 산국수나무속(Physocarpus)의 3속에 속하는 약 18종으로 구성되어 있다. 나도국수나무족은 숙존하거나 조락하는 탁엽, 열편으로 갈리는 잎, 난형이고 광택이 있는 종자 및 풍부한 배유를 갖는 특징에 의해 장미과 내의 다른 족들과 뚜렷이 구분되며, 분자계통학적 연구 결과에서도 단계통군으로 강한 지지를 받는다. 그러나, 나도국수나무족 내의 종 간에 나타나는 복잡한 형태 변이 양상으로 인해 다양한 분류체계가 제시되어 있고 많은 종들이 기재되어 있으나, 전세계에 분포하는 나도국수나무족의 모든 종을 포함한 종합적인 분류학적 연구는 수행된 바 없다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 나도국수나무족의 종속지적 연구의 일환으로 기준표본을 포함한 표본 조사 및 야외 조사를 바탕으로 한 형태형질 분석 결과와 현재까지 밝혀진 분자계통학적 연구 결과를 토대로 산국수나무속의 분류를 제시하였다. 각 종에 대한 검색표, 모든 학명에 대한 자세한 명명법적인 검증 및 처리 그리고 나도국수나무족, 산국수나무속 및 각 종에 대한 기재, 분포도 및 조사한 표본의 목록을 제시하였다. 본 연구에서는 산국수나무속에 6종을 인식하였으며, 다음의 학명에 대한 선정기준표본을 지정하였다 (Opulaster pubescens, Opulaster ramaleyi, Spiraea opulifolia var. parvifolia, Spiraea opulifolia var. tomentella, Physocarpus michiganensis, Physocarpus missouriensis).

Keywords

References

  1. Baldwin, J. T. Jr. 1951. Chromosomes of Spiraea and of certain other genera of Rosaceae. Rhodora 53: 203-206.
  2. Ball, P. W. 1968. Physocarpus. In Flora Europaea, vol. 2. Tutin, T. G., V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters and D. A. Webb (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  3. Bentham, G. and J. D. Hooker. 1865. Genera Plantarum, vol. 1. William Pamplin, Lovell Reeve and Co., Williams and Norgate, London.
  4. Blume, C. L. 1826. Bijdragen tot de Flora van Nederlandsch Indie. Ter Lands Drukkerij, Batavia.
  5. Blume, C. L. 1855. Melanges botaniques. (a facsimile in Taxon 35: 274-285).
  6. Boufford, D. E. and S. A. Spongberg. 1983. Eastern Asian-eastern North American phytogeographical relationships-a history from the time of Linnaeus to the twentieth century. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 70: 423-439. https://doi.org/10.2307/2992081
  7. Briquet, J. 1906. International Rules of Botanical Nomenclature adopted by the International Botanical Congress of Vienna 1905. Verlag von Gustav Fischer, Jena.
  8. Brummitt, R. K. 2005. Report of the committee for Spermatophyta: 57. Taxon 54: 1093-1103. https://doi.org/10.2307/25065499
  9. Cambessedes, M. J. 1824. Monographie des Spirees. Annales des Sciences Naturelles 1: 352-391.
  10. Candolle, A. P. de. 1825. Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis, vol. 2. Sumptibus Sociorum Treuttel et Wurtz, Paris.
  11. Cullen, J. 1971. The genus Neillia (Rosaceae) in mainland Asia and in cultivation. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 52: 137-158.
  12. Daniels, F. P. 1907. The flora of Columbia Missouri and vicinity. The University of Missouri Studies, Science Series 1: 1-319.
  13. Don, D. 1825. Prodromus Florae Nepalensis. Veneunt apud J. Gale, London.
  14. Fernald, M. L. 1970. Gray's Manual of Botany, ed 8. D. Van Nostrand Company, New York.
  15. Gleason, H. A. and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada, ed. 2. New York Botanical Garden, New York.
  16. Greene, E. L. 1889. The North American Neilliae. Pittonia 2: 25-31.
  17. Heller, A. A. 1898. New and interesting plants from western North America. III. Bulletin of Torrey Botanical Club 25: 580-582. https://doi.org/10.2307/2478184
  18. Howell, J. T. 1931. A Great Basin species of Physocarpus. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 20: 129-134.
  19. Holmgren, N. H. 1997. Physocarpus. In Intermountain Flora, vol. 3, part A, Cronquist, A., N. H. Holmgren and P. K. Holmgren (eds.). The New York Botanical Garden, New York. Pp. 70-72.
  20. Hutchinson, J. 1964. The Genera of Flowering Plants, vol. 1. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  21. Jones, M. E. 1893. Contributions to western botany. Zoe 4: 22-54.
  22. Kalkman, C. 1988. The phylogeny of the Rosaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 98: 37-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1988.tb01693.x
  23. Komarov, V. L. 1932. Species novae plantarum orientalis extremi U.R.S.S. Izvestija Botaniceskogo Sada Akademii Nauk SSSR 30: 189-223.
  24. Kruckeberg, A. R. 1982. Gardening with Native Plants of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle.
  25. Kuntze, O. 1891a. Revisio Generum Plantarum, pars I. Arthur Felix, Leipzig
  26. Kuntze, O. 1891b. Revisio Generum Plantarum, pars II. Arthur Felix, Leipzig.
  27. Lee, S. 2007. Physocarpus. In Genera of Vascular Plants of Korea, Park, C.-W. (ed.), Academy Publishing Co., Seoul. Pp. 538-539.
  28. Lee, T. B. 1980. Illustrated flora of Korea. Hyangmunsa, Seoul.
  29. Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species Plantarum. Impensis Laruentii Salvii, Stockholm.
  30. Manos, P. S. and M. J. Donoghue. 2001. Progress in Northern Hemisphere phytogeography: An introduction. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162 (Supplement): S1-S2. https://doi.org/10.1086/324421
  31. Manos, P. S. and J. E. Meireles. 2015. Biogeograhic analysis of the woody plants of the southern Appalachians: Implications for the origins of a regional flora. American Journal of Botany 102: 780-804. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1400530
  32. Maximowicz, C. J. 1859. Primitiae florae Amurensis. Memoires Presentes a l'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de St.-Petersbourg par Divers Savants et lus dans ses Assemblees 9: 1-504.
  33. Maximowicz, C. J. 1879. Adnotationes de Spiraeaceis. Trudy Imperatorskago S.-Peterburgskago Botaniceskago Sada 6: 105-261.
  34. McNeill, J., F. R. Barrie, W. R., Buck, V. Demoulin, W. Greuter, D. L. Hawksworth, P. S. Herendeen, S. Knapp, K. Marhold, J. Prado, W. F. Prud'homme van Reine, G. F. Smith, J. H. Wiersema and N. J. Turland. 2012. International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Melbourne Code). Koeltz, Konigstein.
  35. McVaugh, R. 1973. Report of the Committee for Spermatophyta. Taxon 22: 153-157.
  36. Medikus, F. K. 1799. Beytrage zur Pflanzen-Anatomie. Heinrich Graff, Leipzig.
  37. Miquel, F. A. W. 1855. Flora van Nederlandsch Indie. Fried. Fleischer, Leipzig.
  38. Morgan, D. R., D. E. Soltis and K. R. Robertson. 1994. Systematic and evolutionary implications of rbcL sequence variation in Rosaceae. American Journal of Botany 81: 890-903. https://doi.org/10.2307/2445770
  39. Nakai, T. 1918. Notulae ad plantas Japoniae et Koreae XVII. Botanical Magazine 32: 103-110. https://doi.org/10.15281/jplantres1887.32.377_103
  40. Nelson, A. 1902. Contributions from the Rocky Mountain Herbarium. IV. Botanical Gazette 34: 355-371. https://doi.org/10.1086/328298
  41. Oh, S. 2004. Proposal to conserve the name Physocarpus opulifolius (L.) Maxim. against Physocarpus opulifolius Raf. (Rosaceae). Taxon 53: 212-213. https://doi.org/10.2307/4135524
  42. Oh, S. 2006. Neillia includes Stephanandra (Rosaceae). Novon 16: 91-95. https://doi.org/10.3417/1055-3177(2006)16[91:NISR]2.0.CO;2
  43. Oh, S. and D. Potter. 2003. Phylogenetic utility of the second intron of LEAFY in Neillia and Stephanandra (Rosaceae) and implications for the origin of Stephanandra. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00093-9
  44. Oh, S. and D. Potter. 2005. Molecular phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of tribe Neillieae (Rosaceae) using DNA sequences of cpDNA, rDNA, and LEAFY. American Journal of Botany 92: 179-192. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.1.179
  45. Oh, S. and D. Potter. 2006. Description and phylogenetic position of a new angiosperm family, Guamatelaceae, inferred from chloroplast rbcL, atpB, and matK sequences. Systematic Botany 31: 730-738. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364406779695889
  46. Oh, S., L. Chen, S. Kim, Y. Kim and H. Shin. 2010. Phylogenetic relationship of Physocarpus insularis (Rosaceae) endemic on Ulleung Island: Implications for conservation biology. Journal of Plant Biology 53: 94-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-009-9093-z
  47. Potter, D., F. Gao, P. E. Bortiri, S. Oh and S. Baggett. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in Rosaceae inferred from chloroplast matK and trnL-trnF nucleotide sequence data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 231: 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s006060200012
  48. Potter, D., T. Eriksson, R. C. Evans, S. Oh, J. Smedmark, D. R. Morgan, M. Kerr, K. R. Robertson, M. Arsenault, T. A. Dickinson and C. Campbell. 2007. Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 266: 5-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0539-9
  49. Poyarkova, A. I. 1939. Physocarpus. In Flora of the USSR, vol. 9. Komarov, V. L. (ed.), Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Moskva-Leningrad. Pp. 217-218.
  50. Rafinesque, C. S. 1832. 107. Twenty new genera of plants from the Oregon mountains &c. Atlantic Journal, and friend of knowledge 1: 144-146.
  51. Rafinesque, C. S. 1838. New Flora of North America. Philadelphia.
  52. Raven, P. H. 1972. Plant species disjunctions: A summary. Annals of Missouri Botanical Garden 59: 234-246. https://doi.org/10.2307/2394756
  53. Rehder, A. 1940. Manual of Cultivated Trees and Shrubs Hardy in North America, Exclusive of the Subtropical and Warmer Temperate Regions, ed. 2. Macmillan Company, New York.
  54. Reveal, J. L., G. E. Mounton and A. E. Schuyer. 1999. The Lewis and Clark collections of vascular plants: Names, types, and comments. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 149:1-64.
  55. Rickett, H. W. and F. A. Stafleu. 1959. Nomina generica conservana et rejicienda Spermatophytorum III. Taxon 8: 282-314. https://doi.org/10.2307/1215952
  56. Robertson, K. R. 1972. Nomina conservanda proposita (329). Taxon 21: 211-212.
  57. Robertson, K. R. 1974. The genera of Rosaceae in the southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 55: 303-332.
  58. Rydberg, P. A. 1908. Rosaceae. In North American flora, vol. 22. New York Botanical Garden, New York. Pp. 239-388.
  59. Rydberg, P. A. 1922. Flora of the Rocky Mountain and adjacent plains, 2 nd ed. Press of Intelligencer Printing Co., Lancaster.
  60. Sax, K. 1931. The origin and relationships of the Pomoideae. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 12: 3-22.
  61. Schneider, C. K. 1905. Illustriertes Handbuch der Laubholzkunde. Verlag von Gustav Fischer, Jena.
  62. Schulze-Menz, G. K. 1964. Rosaceae. In Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien II, Melchior, H. (ed.), Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin. Pp. 209-218.
  63. Shin, H., Y. Kim and S. Oh. 2011. A new combination of Spiraea (Rosaceae) from Ulleung Island, Korea. Novon 21: 373-37. https://doi.org/10.3417/2009126
  64. Small, J. K. 1903. Flora of the southeastern United States. Published by the author, New York.
  65. Small, J. K. 1933. Manual of the Southeastern flora. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
  66. Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
  67. Tiffney, B. H. 1985a. Perspectives on the origin of the floristic similarity between eastern Asia and eastern North America. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 66: 73-94. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.13179
  68. Tiffney, B. H. 1985b. The Eocene North Atlantic land bridge: its importance in Tertiary and modern phytogeography of the Northern Hemisphere. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 66: 243-273. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.13183
  69. Tournefort, J. P. de. 1700. Institutiones rei Herbariae. Typographia regia, Paris.
  70. Vidal, J. 1963. Le genre Neillia (Rosaceae). Adansonia 3: 142-166.
  71. Watson, S. 1876. Descriptions of new species of plants, chiefly Californian, with revisions of certain genera. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 11: 121-148.
  72. Welsh, S. L. 1982. Utah flora: Rosaceae. The Great Basin Naturalist 42: 1-44.
  73. Wood, C. E. Jr. 1972. Morphology and phytogeography: The classical approach to the study of disjunctions. Annals of Missouri Botanical Garden 59: 107-124. https://doi.org/10.2307/2394747
  74. Yu, T. and T. Ku. 1974. Physocarpus, Neillia, Stephanandra. In Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, vol. 36. Science Press, Beijing. Pp. 80-98.

Cited by

  1. Taxonomy of tribe Neillieae (Rosaceae): Neillia vol.46, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2016.46.1.13
  2. Phylogenetic evaluation of pollen and orbicule morphology in Rosaceae tribe Neillieae (subfamily Amygdaloideae) vol.183, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/bow019
  3. The systematic implications of leaf micromorphological characteristics in the tribe Neillieae (Spiraeoideae, Rosaceae) vol.47, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2017.47.3.222
  4. The geography of follicle pubescence in the Physocarpus opulifolius (Rosaceae) complex1,2 vol.147, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3159/torrey-d-19-00048.1