DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effective Process Parameters on Shape Dimensional Accuracy in Incremental Sheet Metal Forming

점진성형에서 형상 정밀도에 영향을 미치는 공정 변수

  • Kang, Jae-Gwan (Division of Mechanical Engineering, Kyungnam University) ;
  • Jung, Jong-Yun (School of Industrial Engineering and Naval Architecture, Changwon National University)
  • 강재관 (경남대학교 기계공학부) ;
  • 정종윤 (창원대학교 산업조선해양공학부)
  • Received : 2015.10.12
  • Accepted : 2015.12.10
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

Incremental sheet metal forming is a manufacturing process to produce thin parts using sheet metals by a series of small incremental deformation. The process rarely needs dedicated dies and molds, thus, preparation time for the process is relatively short as to be compared to conventional metal forming. Spring back in sheet metal working is very common, which causes critical errors in dimensions. Incremental sheet metal forming is not fully investigated yet. Hence, incremental sheet metal forming frequently produces inaccurate parts. This paper proposes a method to minimize dimensional errors to improve shape accuracy of products manufactured by incremental forming. This study conducts experiments using an exclusive incremental forming machine and the material for these experiments are sheets of aluminum AL1015. This research defines a process parameter and selects a few factors for the experiments. The parameters employed in this paper are tool feed rate, tool diameter, step depth, material thickness, forming method, dies applied, and tool path method. In addition, their levels for each factor are determined. The plan of the experiments is designed using orthogonal array $L_8$ ($2^7$) which requires minimum number of experiments. Based on the measurements, dimensional errors are collected both on the tool contacted surfaces and on the non-contacted surfaces. The distances between the formed surfaces and the CAD models are scanned and recorded using a commercial software product. These collected data are statistically analyzed and ANOVAs (analysis of variances) are drawn up. From the ANOVAs, this paper concludes that the process parameters of tool diameter, forming depth, and forming method are the significant factors to reduce the errors on the tool contacted surface. On the other hand, the experimental factors of forming method and dies applied are the significant factors on the non-contacted surface. However, the negative forming method always produces better accuracy than the positive forming method.

Keywords

References

  1. Ambrogio, G. and Filice, L., Improving Industrial Suitability of Incremental Sheet Forming Process. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology, 2013, Vol. 58, pp. 941-947.
  2. Ambrogio, G., Constatino, I., De Napoli, L., Filice, L., Fratini, L., and Muzzupappa, M., Influence of Some Relevant Process Parameters on the Dimensional Accuracy in Incremental Forming : a Numerical and Experimental Investigation. Materials Processing Technology, 2004, Vol. 153-154, pp. 501-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.139
  3. Ambrogio, G., De Napoli, L., Filice, L., Gagliardi, F., and Muzzupappa, M., Application of Incremental Forming Process for High Customised Medical Product Manufacturing, J. Mater. Process. Techno, 162-163, 2005, pp. 156-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.148
  4. Ambrogio, G., Gagliardi, F., Bruschi, S., and Filice, L., On the High-Speed Single Point Incremental Forming of Titanium Alloys. CIRP Annals, 2013, Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 243-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2013.03.053
  5. Araghi, B.T., Manco, G.L., Bambach, M., and Hirt, G., Investigation into a New Hybrid Forming Process : Incremental Sheet Forming Combined with Stretch Forming. CIRP Annals, 2009, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 225-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.101
  6. Cavaler, L.C.C., Schaeffer, I., Rocha, A.S., and Peruch, F., Surface Roughness in the Incremental Forming of AISI 304L Stainless Steel Sheets. Far East Journal of Mechnical Engineering and Physics, 2010, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 87-98.
  7. Hou, X.Y. and Jung, J.Y., Surface Roughness of Turned Aluminum in MQL. Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2011, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 52-59.
  8. Jang, D.H., Mutual Information as s Criterion for Evaluating the Degree of the Orthogonality of Nearly Orthogonal Arrays. Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, 2008, Vol. 36, No. 13, pp. 13-20.
  9. Jeswiet, J., Micari, F., Bramley, A., Duflou, J., and Allwood, J., Asymmetric Single Point Incremental Forming of Sheet Metal. CIRP Annals, 2005, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 88-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60021-3
  10. Lee, K. and Kang, J.G., Influence of the Part Shape Complexity and Die Type on Forming Accuracy in Incremental Sheet Metal Forming. Journal of the Korean Society of Manufacturing Technology Engineers, 2014, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 513-518.
  11. Lee, K., Lee, S., and Kang, J.G., Effective Process Parameters in Incremental Sheet Metal Forming. Journal of the Korean Society of Manufacturing Process Engineers, 2011, Vol. 10, No. 2.
  12. Lee, K., Oh, H., and Kang, J.G., Forming Accuracy Comparison between Positive and Negative Incremental Forming of AL 1050. Journal of the Korean Society of Manufacturing Technology Engineers, 2013, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 800-805. https://doi.org/10.7735/ksmte.2013.22.5.800
  13. Radu, C., Effects of Process Parameters on the Quality of Parts Processed by Single Point Incremental Forming. Int. J. Modern Manufacturing Technologies, 2011, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 91-96.
  14. Radu, C., Eugen, H., Cristea, I., and Schnakovszky, C., Analysis of the Surface Quality of Parts Processed by Single Point Incremental Forming. Journal of Engineering Studies and Research, 2013, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 76-79.
  15. Radu, M.C. and Cristea, I., Processing Metal Sheets by SPIF and Analysis of Parts Quality. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 2013, Vol. 28, pp. 287-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2012.746702

Cited by

  1. The Analysis of Forming Forces in Single Point Incremental Forming vol.81, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20168105004
  2. 음각 점진성형에서 치수정밀도에 영향을 미치는 형상 파라미터 분석 vol.39, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2016.39.4.090
  3. 반응표면법을 이용한 Al5052 판재의 점진성형 최적화 연구 vol.30, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5228/kstp.2021.30.1.27