DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nomogram Estimating the Probability of Intraabdominal Abscesses after Gastrectomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer

  • Eom, Bang Wool (Gastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Joo, Jungnam (Biometric Research Branch, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Kim, Young-Woo (Gastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Park, Boram (Biometric Research Branch, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Yoon, Hong Man (Gastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Ryu, Keun Won (Gastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Kim, Soo Jin (Gastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center)
  • Received : 2015.11.11
  • Accepted : 2015.12.12
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: Intraabdominal abscess is one of the most common reasons for re-hospitalization after gastrectomy. This study aimed to develop a model for estimating the probability of intraabdominal abscesses that can be used during the postoperative period. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological data of 1,564 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer between 2010 and 2012. Twenty-six related markers were analyzed, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to develop the probability estimation model for intraabdominal abscess. Internal validation using a bootstrap approach was employed to correct for bias, and the model was then validated using an independent dataset comprising of patients who underwent gastrectomy between January 2008 and March 2010. Discrimination and calibration abilities were checked in both datasets. Results: The incidence of intraabdominal abscess in the development set was 7.80% (122/1,564). The surgical approach, operating time, pathologic N classification, body temperature, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein level, glucose level, and change in the hemoglobin level were significant predictors of intraabdominal abscess in the multivariate analysis. The probability estimation model that was developed on the basis of these results showed good discrimination and calibration abilities (concordance index=0.828, Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-statistic P=0.274). Finally, we combined both datasets to produce a nomogram that estimates the probability of intraabdominal abscess. Conclusions: This nomogram can be useful for identifying patients at a high risk of intraabdominal abscess. Patients at a high risk may benefit from further evaluation or treatment before discharge.

Keywords

References

  1. Bonenkamp JJ, Songun I, Hermans J, Sasako M, Welvaart K, Plukker JT, et al. Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients. Lancet 1995;345:745-748. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90637-1
  2. Cuschieri A, Fayers P, Fielding J, Craven J, Bancewicz J, Joypaul V, et al; The Surgical Cooperative Group. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. Lancet 1996;347:995-999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90144-0
  3. Sano T, Sasako M, Yamamoto S, Nashimoto A, Kurita A, Hiratsuka M, et al. Gastric cancer surgery: morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic lymphadenectomy: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study 9501. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:2767-2773. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.10.184
  4. Zilberstein B, Martins BC, Jacob CE, Bresciani C, Lopasso FP, de Cleva R, et al. Complications of gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2004;7:254-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-004-0301-8
  5. Ryu KW, Kim YW, Lee JH, Nam BH, Kook MC, Choi IJ, et al. Surgical complications and the risk factors of laparoscopyassisted distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:1625-1631. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-9845-x
  6. Ahn CW, Hur H, Han SU, Cho YK. Comparison of intracorporeal reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with extracorporeal reconstruction in the view of learning curve. J Gastric Cancer 2013;13:34-43. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2013.13.1.34
  7. Kim KM, An JY, Kim HI, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Noh SH. Major early complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy. Br J Surg 2012;99:1681-1687. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8924
  8. Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report: a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg 2010;251:417-420. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b
  9. Kim YW, Yoon HM, Eom BW, Park JY. History of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer in Korea. J Gastric Cancer 2012;12:13-17. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2012.12.1.13
  10. Wu CW, Hsiung CA, Lo SS, Hsieh MC, Shia LT, Whang-Peng J. Randomized clinical trial of morbidity after D1 and D3 surgery for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2004;91:283-287. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4433
  11. Tang J, Humes DJ, Gemmil E, Welch NT, Parsons SL, Catton JA. Reduction in length of stay for patients undergoing oesophageal and gastric resections with implementation of enhanced recovery packages. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2013;95:323-328. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588413X13629960046039
  12. Grantcharov TP, Kehlet H. Laparoscopic gastric surgery in an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 2010;97:1547-1551. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7184
  13. So JB, Lim ZL, Lin HA, Ti TK. Reduction of hospital stay and cost after the implementation of a clinical pathway for radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2008;11:81-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-008-0458-7
  14. Choi JW, Xuan Y, Hur H, Byun CS, Han SU, Cho YK. Outcomes of critical pathway in laparoscopic and open surgical treatments for gastric cancer patients: patients selection for fast-track program through retrospective analysis. J Gastric Cancer 2013;13:98-105. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2013.13.2.98
  15. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 2011;14:113-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0042-4
  16. Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg 2009;250:177-186. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181afde41
  17. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook. 7th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2010.
  18. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996;15:361-387. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4
  19. Simon R. Diagnostic and prognostic prediction using gene expression profiles in high-dimensional microarray data. Br J Cancer 2003;89:1599-1604. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601326
  20. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al; On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis- Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:707-710. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709751
  21. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985;13:818-829. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009
  22. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 1993;270:2957-2963. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03510240069035
  23. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 1991;78:355-360. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800780327
  24. Wijesinghe LD, Mahmood T, Scott DJ, Berridge DC, Kent PJ, Kester RC. Comparison of POSSUM and the Portsmouth predictor equation for predicting death following vascular surgery. Br J Surg 1998;85:209-212. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00709.x
  25. Sagar PM, Hartley MN, MacFie J, Taylor BA, Copeland GP. Comparison of individual surgeon's performance. Risk-adjusted analysis with POSSUM scoring system. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:654-658. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02056945
  26. Neary B, Whitman B, Foy C, Heather BP, Earnshaw JJ. Value of POSSUM physiology scoring to assess outcome after intraarterial thrombolysis for acute leg ischaemia (short note). Br J Surg 2001;88:1344-1345. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01914.x
  27. Williams DJ, Walker JD. A nomogram to calculate the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM). Br J Surg 2014;101:239-245. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9363
  28. Hartgrink HH, van de Velde CJ, Putter H, Bonenkamp JJ, Klein Kranenbarg E, Songun I, et al. Extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: who may benefit? Final results of the randomized Dutch gastric cancer group trial. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:2069-2077. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.08.026
  29. Park DJ, Lee HJ, Kim HH, Yang HK, Lee KU, Choe KJ. Predictors of operative morbidity and mortality in gastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2005;92:1099-1102. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4952
  30. Seo SH, Hur H, An CW, Yi X, Kim JY, Han SU, et al. Operative risk factors in gastric cancer surgery for elderly patients. J Gastric Cancer 2011;11:116-121. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2011.11.2.116
  31. Lee JH, Park do J, Kim HH, Lee HJ, Yang HK. Comparison of complications after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the Clavien- Dindo classification. Surg Endosc 2012;26:1287-1295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2027-0
  32. Bozzetti F, Marubini E, Bonfanti G, Miceli R, Piano C, Crose N, et al; The Italian Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. Total versus subtotal gastrectomy: surgical morbidity and mortality rates in a multicenter Italian randomized trial. Ann Surg 1997;226:613-620. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199711000-00006
  33. Lo CH, Chen JH, Wu CW, Lo SS, Hsieh MC, Lui WY. Risk factors and management of intra-abdominal infection after extended radical gastrectomy. Am J Surg 2008;196:741-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.11.031
  34. Miletic KG, Taylor TN, Martin ET, Vaidya R, Kaye KS. Readmissions after diagnosis of surgical site infection following knee and hip arthroplasty. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:152-157. https://doi.org/10.1086/674854
  35. Avritscher EB, Cooksley CD, Rolston KV, Swint JM, Delclos GL, Franzini L, et al. Serious postoperative infections following resection of common solid tumors: outcomes, costs, and impact of hospital surgical volume. Support Care Cancer 2014;22:527-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-2006-1
  36. Keller DS, Swendseid B, Khorgami Z, Champagne BJ, Reynolds HL Jr, Stein SL, et al. Predicting the unpredictable: comparing readmitted versus non-readmitted colorectal surgery patients. Am J Surg 2014;207:346-351; discussion 350-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.008
  37. Tingstedt B, Isaksson J, Andersson R. Long-term follow-up and cost analysis following surgery for small bowel obstruction caused by intra-abdominal adhesions. Br J Surg 2007;94:743-748. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5634

Cited by

  1. C-reactive protein can be an early predictor of postoperative complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer vol.31, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5272-4
  2. A Nomogram for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Submucosal Colorectal Cancer vol.102, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.9738/intsurg-d-16-00210.1